Paper · 2018 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Carbon dynamics, potential and cost of carbon sequestration in double rice cropping system in semi arid southern India

Krishna Chaitanya Anantha; Shyam Prasad Majumder; Dhaneshwar Padhan; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
46
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Studying the dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) is important for understanding the mechanistic pathways of C stabilization into different SOC pools.An attempt was, therefore, made to assess the impact of double rice cropping system with different levels of fertilizers and in combination with organics on C sequestration and its stabilization in an Inceptisol using a 14-year old experiment at Jagtial under semi-arid climate in India.Total organic carbon (TOC) allocated into different pools in order of very labile > less labile > non labile > labile, constituting about 41.4, 20.6, 19.3 and 18.7%, respectively.In comparison with control, system receiving farmyard manure (FYM-10 Mg ha -1 season -1 ) alone showed greater C build up (40.5%) followed by 100% NPK+FYM (120:60:40 kg N,P,K ha -1 +5 Mg FYM ha -1 season -1 )(16.2%).In fact, a net depletion of carbon stock was observed with 50% NPK (-1.2 Mg ha -1 ) and control (-1.8 Mg ha -1 ) treatments.Only 28.9% of C applied through FYM was stabilized as SOC.A minimal input of 2.34 Mg C ha -1 y -1 is needed to maintain SOC level.Treatments with organics showed a higher carbon management index, and microbial biomass and other labile pools of SOC.Results also indicated that100% NPK+FYM could maintain yield sustainability with a lower cost of carbon sequestration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total organic carbon pools ranked very labile above less labile above non labile above labile.

Outcome
Total organic carbon (TOC)e0
Setting
different poolse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total organic carbon (TOC) allocated into different pools in order of very labile > less labile > non labile > labile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very labile carbon constituted about 41.4%.

Outcome
very labilee0
Value
41.4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“very labile > less labile > non labile > labile, constituting about 41.4, 20.6, 19.3 and 18.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Less labile carbon constituted about 20.6%.

Outcome
less labilee0
Value
20.6e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“very labile > less labile > non labile > labile, constituting about 41.4, 20.6, 19.3 and 18.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non labile carbon constituted about 19.3%.

Outcome
non labilee0
Value
19.3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“very labile > less labile > non labile > labile, constituting about 41.4, 20.6, 19.3 and 18.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Labile carbon constituted about 18.7%.

Outcome
labilee0
Value
18.7%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“very labile > less labile > non labile > labile, constituting about 41.4, 20.6, 19.3 and 18.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM alone increased carbon buildup by 40.5% against control.

Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM-10 Mg ha -1 season -1 ) alonee0
Outcome
C build upe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
40.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“In comparison with control, system receiving farmyard manure (FYM-10 Mg ha -1 season -1 ) alone showed greater C build up (40.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus FYM increased carbon buildup by 16.2%.

Treatment
100% NPK+FYM (120:60:40 kg N,P,K ha -1 +5 Mg FYM ha -1 season -1 )e0
Outcome
100% NPK+FYMe0
Value
16.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% NPK+FYM (120:60:40 kg N,P,K ha -1 +5 Mg FYM ha -1 season -1 )(16.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% NPK treatment depleted carbon stock by 1.2 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
50% NPKe0
Outcome
carbon stocke0
Direction
depletione0
Value
-1.2 Mg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“a net depletion of carbon stock was observed with 50% NPK (-1.2 Mg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control depleted carbon stock by 1.8 Mg per hectare.

Outcome
controle0
Value
-1.8 Mg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“control (-1.8 Mg ha -1 ) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of applied FYM carbon, 28.9% stabilized as soil organic carbon.

Outcome
C applied through FYM was stabilized as SOCe0
Value
28.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only 28.9% of C applied through FYM was stabilized as SOC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1014 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An input of 2.34 Mg C per hectare yearly is needed to maintain soil carbon.

Outcome
maintain SOC levele0
Value
2.34 Mg C ha -1 y -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A minimal input of 2.34 Mg C ha -1 y -1 is needed to maintain SOC level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatments had higher carbon management index and microbial biomass.

Treatment
Treatments with organicse0
Outcome
carbon management index, and microbial biomass and other labile pools of SOCe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments with organics showed a higher carbon management index, and microbial biomass and other labile pools of SOC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus FYM maintained yield sustainability with a lower cost of carbon sequestration.

Treatment
100% NPK+FYMe0
Outcome
yield sustainabilitye0
Direction
maintaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% NPK+FYM could maintain yield sustainability with a lower cost of carbon sequestration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1322 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 280 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.