Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 1985 cyanamide spray increased Perlette yield by 6%.

A claim from Improving Grapevine Budbreak and Yields by Evaporative Cooling · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1985 cyanamide spray increased Perlette yield by 6%.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
‘Perlette’e0
Treatment
cyanamide spraye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Qualifier
1985e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1985 cyanamide spray and evaporative cooling alone increased yield of ‘Perlette’ by 6% and 6% to 24%, respectively, and by 17% to 46% when both treatments were combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–869
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–19

Title

Improving Grapevine Budbreak and Yields by Evaporative Cooling

G. Nir; I. Klein; S. Lavee; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1988. doi:10.21273/jashs.113.4.512

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c8ec981c5a94de337e35bb4c1aa987fe6fec4fa9097d16e30900d16657fbcd17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

cyanamide · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.