Paper · 2021 · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología

Последействие применения гиббереллина на столовых сортах винограда

Андрей ШТИРБУ; Наталия СИВАК

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The aftereffect of the use of gibberellin (GА3) on the maturation of canes and the yield of table grape cultivars was studied. Based on the results of the laboratory-field experiment, the influence of the cultivar and the use of GА3 on the accumulation of soluble sugars and starch in shoots in the period after the end of the growing season was established. The effect of the mutual influence of the cultivar and the use of GА3 is manifested only for the total carbohydrate content in annual shoots. The use of GА3 does not have a negative effect on the cane’s matu-ration processes of the cultivars “Flora”, “Talisman” and “Kishmish luchistyi”, increases the content of soluble sugars in the shoots by 0.6-1.6%, starch – by 0.5-0.8%, their sum – by 1.0-2.2%. The use of GА3 by the method of local spraying of inflorescences does not have a negative aftereffect on the indicators of plant yield after three years of use of the growth regulator.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and GА3 use influenced shoot sugar and starch accumulation.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3e0
Outcome
accumulation of soluble sugars and starch in shootse0
Qualifier
in the period after the end of the growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of the cultivar and the use of GА3 on the accumulation of soluble sugars and starch in shoots in the period after the end of the growing season was established.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and GА3 interaction affected total carbohydrate content in annual shoots.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3e0
Outcome
total carbohydrate content in annual shootse0
Qualifier
onlye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the mutual influence of the cultivar and the use of GА3 is manifested only for the total carbohydrate content in annual shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GА3 did not harm cane maturation in Flora, Talisman and Kishmish luchistyi.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Material
“Flora”, “Talisman” and “Kishmish luchistyi”e0
Treatment
use of GА3e0
Outcome
cane’s matu-ration processese0
Direction
does not have a negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of GА3 does not have a negative effect on the cane’s matu-ration processes of the cultivars “Flora”, “Talisman” and “Kishmish luchistyi””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GА3 increased soluble sugars in shoots by 0.6-1.6%.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3e2
Outcome
content of soluble sugars in the shootse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
0.6-1.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases the content of soluble sugars in the shoots by 0.6-1.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“the use of GА3 on the accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GА3 increased starch in shoots by 0.5-0.8%.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3e2
Outcome
starche0
Direction
increasese3
Value
0.5-0.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“starch – by 0.5-0.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–734 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“the use of GА3 on the accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–252 · show in text ↑
e3

“increases the content of soluble sugars in the shoots by 0.6-1.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GА3 increased the sum of sugars and starch by 1.0-2.2%.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3e2
Outcome
their sume0
Direction
increasese3
Value
1.0-2.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“their sum – by 1.0-2.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“the use of GА3 on the accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–252 · show in text ↑
e3

“increases the content of soluble sugars in the shoots by 0.6-1.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local GА3 spraying had no negative yield aftereffect after three years.

Taxon
table grape cultivarse1
Treatment
use of GА3 by the method of local spraying of inflorescencese0
Outcome
indicators of plant yielde0
Direction
does not have a negative aftereffecte0
Qualifier
after three years of use of the growth regulatore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of GА3 by the method of local spraying of inflorescences does not have a negative aftereffect on the indicators of plant yield after three years of use of the growth regulator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“table grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–113 · show in text ↑

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.