Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under AWD, rice WUE increased.

A claim from Yield and Water Use Efficiency Were Enhanced Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation in Rice Through Improving Leaf Morphology and Physiology · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AWD, rice WUE increased.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional irrigation (CI)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that yield and WUE were significantly increased under AWD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–655
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–98
e1

“conventional irrigation (CI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–445

Title

Yield and Water Use Efficiency Were Enhanced Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation in Rice Through Improving Leaf Morphology and Physiology

Ying Zhang; Qinghao Meng; Nan Zhang; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2025. doi:10.1111/jac.70068

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-4e677bb87520b00af5225114f04c76bc5d8f8693533a24c54d1f809d3edca5ac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

processing · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 34 positive, 1 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.