Azotobacter salinestris 8 claims

species · family Pseudomonadaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

2 spellings

8 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. salinestris inoculation improved plant height, total shoot and floret weight under limited N.

Taxon: purple cauliflowerst0
Treatment: A. salinestris inoculatione1
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise1symbiont
Outcome: Plant height, total shoot and floret weighte1
Direction: improvede1
Qualifier: under limited doses of Ne1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“valorization of purple cauliflowers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–170

e1
“Plant height, total shoot and floret weight, and % dry weight in florets and leaves were improved by A. salinestris inoculation under limited doses of N”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–888

Title

Ecofriendly strategy based on the combination of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria and reduced nitrate doses boosts the valorization of purple cauliflowers

Jacinta Collado-González; María Carmen Piñero; Ginés Otálora; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1571301

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect A. salinestris inoculation improved the percentage dry weight in florets and leaves under limited N.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation with a limited N dose increased leaf sugar content by 51% relative to the control.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 30% under 100% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 33% under 60% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 16% under 30% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation enhanced leaf potassium by 26% under limited N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation enhanced leaf iron by 34% under limited N supply.
Recommendation Combining reduced N supply with PGPB inoculation may be an ecofriendly strategy to enhance growth and quality of purple cauliflower.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. salinestris inoculation improved the percentage dry weight in florets and leaves under limited N.

Taxon: purple cauliflowerst0
Treatment: A. salinestris inoculatione1
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise1symbiont
Outcome: % dry weight in florets and leavese1
Direction: improvede1
Qualifier: under limited doses of Ne1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“valorization of purple cauliflowers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–170

e1
“Plant height, total shoot and floret weight, and % dry weight in florets and leaves were improved by A. salinestris inoculation under limited doses of N”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–888

Title

Ecofriendly strategy based on the combination of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria and reduced nitrate doses boosts the valorization of purple cauliflowers

Jacinta Collado-González; María Carmen Piñero; Ginés Otálora; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1571301

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect A. salinestris inoculation improved plant height, total shoot and floret weight under limited N.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation with a limited N dose increased leaf sugar content by 51% relative to the control.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 30% under 100% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 33% under 60% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation increased leaf protein by 16% under 30% N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation enhanced leaf potassium by 26% under limited N supply.
Intervention effect PGPB inoculation enhanced leaf iron by 34% under limited N supply.
Recommendation Combining reduced N supply with PGPB inoculation may be an ecofriendly strategy to enhance growth and quality of purple cauliflower.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had no significant effect on measured kohlrabi parameters.

Taxon: KohlrabiBrassica oleracea var. gongylodest0
Treatment: T2e0
Interactor: Azotobacter salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise1symbiont
Outcome: parameters measurede0
Direction: did not present significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“T2 did not present significant effects on the parameters measured.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–952

t0
“Kohlrabi”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–79

e1
“Two formulations were used: T1 (Azospirillum brasilense and Pantoea dispersa) and T2 (Azotobacter salinestris).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–726

Title

Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria as Tools to Improve the Growth of Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) Plants in an Aquaponics System

María Carmen Piñero; Jacinta Collado-González; Ginés Otálora; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050595

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect 50F/50D irrigation reduced several measured kohlrabi parameters.
Intervention effect Adding T1 to 50F/50D attenuated its negative effects.
Intervention effect 50F/50D plus synthetic supplement yielded little difference from 100S.
Intervention effect 50F/50D plus supplement maintained yield while reducing fertilizer and water use.
Recommendation T1 with 50F/50D was assessed positively, but nitrate needs adjustment to maintain production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual bacterial inoculation with 75% mineral N was a superior treatment for maize vegetative growth and grain yield.

Taxon: Maize PlantsZea mayst0
Treatment: A. oryzea and A. salinestris in their dual mix in the presence of 75 followed by 50% mineral Ne0
Interactor: A. oryzeae0symbiont
Second interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise0symbiont
Outcome: vegetative growth and grain yield parameters of maize plantse0
Direction: enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134

e0
“the utilization of A. oryzea and A. salinestris in their dual mix in the presence of 75 followed by 50% mineral N was found to be the superior treatments, causing the enhancement of vegetative growth and grain yield parameters of maize plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1731

Title

Potential Impacts of Certain N2-Fixing Bacterial Strains and Mineral N Doses for Enhancing the Growth and Productivity of Maize Plants

Moustafa Shalaby; Mohssen Elbagory; Nagwa EL-Khateeb; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12223830

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation OT-H1 showed nitrogen-related activities and IAA production in culture.
Intervention effect OT-H1 promoted maize grain germination more than the other isolates.
Observation OT-H1 was identified as closely linked to Azotoacter salinestris strain OR512393.
Intervention effect Nitrogen-fixing bacteria with mineral N had pronounced effects compared with controls.
Association Maize response increased with mineral nitrogen concentration and peaked at 100%.
Observation Differences among nitrogen-fixing bacteria were insignificant.
Intervention effect The superior treatments induced proline and PPO and PO activities in maize leaves.
Intervention effect The superior treatments increased maize grain protein content.
Recommendation The authors recommend nitrogen-fixing bacteria to improve soil fertility with reduced chemical fertilizer use.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize had vigor index 1859.715 under A. salinestris treatment.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment: A. salinestris treatmente0
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: VIe0
Value: 1859.715e0

Verbatim

e0
“Maize showed the highest VI (1859.715), followed by sorghum (1470.84), and wheat (2804.123) with A. salinestris treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1037

Title

Antifungal Potential of Azotobacter salinestris Strain Azt 31 against Phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. Associated with Cereals

Hanumanthu Nagaraja; Gurikar Chennappa; Nagaraj Deepa; et al. Journal of Fungi 2022. doi:10.3390/jof8050473

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in maize by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased maize seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in sorghum by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased sorghum seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in wheat by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased wheat seedling mass.
Observation sorghum had vigor index 1470.84 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation wheat had vigor index 2804.123 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation Seed germination in maize was enhanced to 76%.
Observation Seed germination in sorghum was enhanced to 69%.
Observation Seed germination in wheat was enhanced to 68%.
Intervention effect Dual culture with Azotobacter significantly reduced Fusarium growth.
Observation Azotobacter colonized the rhizoplane at a high CFU rate.
Intervention effect Fusarium significantly inhibited Azotobacter rhizoplane colonization.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, maize had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, sorghum had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, wheat had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sorghum had vigor index 1470.84 under A. salinestris treatment.

Taxon: sorghumSorghume0
Treatment: A. salinestris treatmente0
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: VIe0
Value: 1470.84e0

Verbatim

e0
“Maize showed the highest VI (1859.715), followed by sorghum (1470.84), and wheat (2804.123) with A. salinestris treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1037

Title

Antifungal Potential of Azotobacter salinestris Strain Azt 31 against Phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. Associated with Cereals

Hanumanthu Nagaraja; Gurikar Chennappa; Nagaraj Deepa; et al. Journal of Fungi 2022. doi:10.3390/jof8050473

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in maize by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased maize seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in sorghum by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased sorghum seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in wheat by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased wheat seedling mass.
Observation Maize had vigor index 1859.715 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation wheat had vigor index 2804.123 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation Seed germination in maize was enhanced to 76%.
Observation Seed germination in sorghum was enhanced to 69%.
Observation Seed germination in wheat was enhanced to 68%.
Intervention effect Dual culture with Azotobacter significantly reduced Fusarium growth.
Observation Azotobacter colonized the rhizoplane at a high CFU rate.
Intervention effect Fusarium significantly inhibited Azotobacter rhizoplane colonization.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, maize had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, sorghum had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, wheat had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat had vigor index 2804.123 under A. salinestris treatment.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: A. salinestris treatmente0
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: VIe0
Value: 2804.123e0

Verbatim

e0
“Maize showed the highest VI (1859.715), followed by sorghum (1470.84), and wheat (2804.123) with A. salinestris treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1037

Title

Antifungal Potential of Azotobacter salinestris Strain Azt 31 against Phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. Associated with Cereals

Hanumanthu Nagaraja; Gurikar Chennappa; Nagaraj Deepa; et al. Journal of Fungi 2022. doi:10.3390/jof8050473

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in maize by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased maize seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in sorghum by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased sorghum seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in wheat by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased wheat seedling mass.
Observation Maize had vigor index 1859.715 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation sorghum had vigor index 1470.84 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation Seed germination in maize was enhanced to 76%.
Observation Seed germination in sorghum was enhanced to 69%.
Observation Seed germination in wheat was enhanced to 68%.
Intervention effect Dual culture with Azotobacter significantly reduced Fusarium growth.
Observation Azotobacter colonized the rhizoplane at a high CFU rate.
Intervention effect Fusarium significantly inhibited Azotobacter rhizoplane colonization.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, maize had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, sorghum had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, wheat had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter colonized the rhizoplane at a high CFU rate.

Taxon: cerealst0
Interactor: A. salinestrisAzotobacter salinestrise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: rhizoplane colonizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Efficacy of rhizoplane colonization showed successful isolation of A. salinestris with high CFU rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1246

t0
“Cereals”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–123

Title

Antifungal Potential of Azotobacter salinestris Strain Azt 31 against Phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. Associated with Cereals

Hanumanthu Nagaraja; Gurikar Chennappa; Nagaraj Deepa; et al. Journal of Fungi 2022. doi:10.3390/jof8050473

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in maize by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased maize seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in sorghum by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased sorghum seedling mass.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment reduced Fusarium infection in wheat by up to 50%.
Intervention effect Azotobacter treatment significantly increased wheat seedling mass.
Observation Maize had vigor index 1859.715 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation sorghum had vigor index 1470.84 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation wheat had vigor index 2804.123 under A. salinestris treatment.
Observation Seed germination in maize was enhanced to 76%.
Observation Seed germination in sorghum was enhanced to 69%.
Observation Seed germination in wheat was enhanced to 68%.
Intervention effect Dual culture with Azotobacter significantly reduced Fusarium growth.
Intervention effect Fusarium significantly inhibited Azotobacter rhizoplane colonization.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, maize had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, sorghum had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.
Observation At day 45 in the greenhouse, wheat had the reported peak shoot/root length and root mass.