Bacteria 159,025 claims

Bacteria, including phytoplasmas. 311 families, 3,700 taxa.

311 entries, A to Z

Abditibacteriaceae1 claim · 1 paperAcetivibrionaceae6 claims · 3 papersAcetobacteraceae453 claims · 180 papersAcholeplasmataceae7,801 claims · 2,652 papersAcidaminococcaceae3 claims · 2 papersAcidimicrobiaceae1 claim · 1 paperAcidithiobacillaceae15 claims · 7 papersAcidobacteriaceae19 claims · 17 papersAcidocellaceae4 claims · 4 papersAcidothermaceae13 claims · 12 papersActinomycetaceae66 claims · 43 papersActinospicaceae3 claims · 3 papersAerococcaceae6 claims · 4 papersAeromonadaceae98 claims · 55 papersAerosakkonemataceae2 claims · 1 paperAfifellaceae7 claims · 1 paperAggregatilineaceae1 claim · 1 paperAkkermansiaceae1 claim · 1 paperAlcaligenaceae282 claims · 141 papersAlcanivoracaceae2 claims · 2 papersAlicyclobacillaceae7 claims · 7 papersAllobogoriellaceae1 claim · 1 paperAlloboseaceae3 claims · 2 papersAmoebophilaceae3 claims · 3 papersAnaerolineaceae4 claims · 4 papersAnaeromyxobacteraceae12 claims · 8 papersAnaeroplasmataceae1 claim · 1 paperAnaerovoracaceae1 claim · 1 paperAnaplasmataceae54 claims · 25 papersAncalomicrobiaceae2 claims · 2 papersAnoxybacillaceae17 claims · 9 papersAphanizomenonaceae17 claims · 6 papersAphanothecaceae2 claims · 2 papersAquaspirillaceae5 claims · 3 papersArchangiaceae7 claims · 3 papersArcobacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperArdenticatenaceae1 claim · 1 paperAurantimonadaceae15 claims · 10 papersAzonexaceae9 claims · 8 papersAzospirillaceae5,636 claims · 1,890 papersBacillaceae17,125 claims · 6,624 papersBacteriovoracaceae1 claim · 1 paperBacteroidaceae18 claims · 16 papersBalneolaceae1 claim · 1 paperBeijerinckiaceae41 claims · 27 papersBifidobacteriaceae8 claims · 8 papersBinataceae (SeqCode)1 claim · 1 paperBlastocatellaceae4 claims · 4 papersBrevibacteriaceae61 claims · 22 papersBrucellaceae170 claims · 77 papersBruguierivoracaceae2 claims · 2 papersBryobacteraceae8 claims · 7 papersBudviciaceae1 claim · 1 paperBurkholderiaceae9,746 claims · 3,328 papersCaldicellulosiruptoraceae1 claim · 1 paperCalotrichaceae11 claims · 7 papersCampylobacteraceae23 claims · 9 papersCandidatus Entotheonellaceae1 claim · 1 paperCarnobacteriaceae3 claims · 3 papersCaryophanaceae63 claims · 31 papersCatenulisporaceae3 claims · 3 papersCaulobacteraceae132 claims · 74 papersCellulomonadaceae14 claims · 9 papersCellvibrionaceae12 claims · 11 papersChelatococcaceae2 claims · 2 papersChitinibacteraceae2 claims · 1 paperChitinophagaceae64 claims · 51 papersChlorobiaceae6 claims · 2 papersChromatiaceae3 claims · 3 papersChromobacteriaceae38 claims · 20 papersChroococcaceae1 claim · 1 paperChroococcidiopsidaceae2 claims · 2 papersChryseotaleaceae1 claim · 1 paperChthoniobacteraceae11 claims · 7 papersClostridiaceae120 claims · 81 papersColeofasciculaceae1 claim · 1 paperComamonadaceae1,395 claims · 489 papersConexibacteraceae8 claims · 8 papersCoprobacillaceae1 claim · 1 paperCorynebacteriaceae65 claims · 41 papersCoxiellaceae6 claims · 6 papersCyclobacteriaceae5 claims · 3 papersCytophagaceae16 claims · 11 papersDehalococcoidaceae1 claim · 1 paperDeinococcaceae7 claims · 5 papersDemequinaceae3 claims · 1 paperDermabacteraceae7 claims · 4 papersDermacoccaceae11 claims · 4 papersDermatophilaceae3 claims · 2 papersDesulfitobacteriaceae2 claims · 2 papersDesulfobacteraceae4 claims · 2 papersDesulfobulbaceae2 claims · 1 paperDesulfocapsaceae1 claim · 1 paperDesulfomicrobiaceae2 claims · 1 paperDesulfomonilaceae3 claims · 2 papersDesulfovibrionaceae11 claims · 7 papersDesulfuromonadaceae2 claims · 2 papersDethiosulfovibrionaceae1 claim · 1 paperDevosiaceae35 claims · 26 papersDietziaceae18 claims · 6 papersDongiaceae5 claims · 3 papersDysgonomonadaceae2 claims · 2 papersEctothiorhodospiraceae4 claims · 3 papersEnterobacteriaceae5,992 claims · 2,978 papersEnterococcaceae215 claims · 152 papersErwiniaceae5,711 claims · 2,104 papersErysipelotrichaceae6 claims · 2 papersErythrobacteraceae5 claims · 4 papersEubacteriaceae1 claim · 1 paperFibrobacteraceae18 claims · 7 papersFictibacillaceae2 claims · 2 papersFilifactoraceae2 claims · 2 papersFimbriimonadaceae1 claim · 1 paperFlavobacteriaceae176 claims · 122 papersFlexibacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperFortieaceae2 claims · 1 paperFrankiaceae1,401 claims · 440 papersFulvivirgaceae8 claims · 8 papersFusobacteriaceae3 claims · 3 papersGaiellaceae22 claims · 20 papersGallionellaceae7 claims · 7 papersGeminicoccaceae1 claim · 1 paperGeminocystaceae9 claims · 7 papersGemmataceae4 claims · 4 papersGemmatimonadaceae40 claims · 36 papersGeobacteraceae17 claims · 13 papersGeodermatophilaceae13 claims · 13 papersGlycomycetaceae5 claims · 5 papersGordoniaceae15 claims · 6 papersHafniaceae14 claims · 6 papersHahellaceae2 claims · 1 paperHaliscomenobacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperHalobacteroidaceae1 claim · 1 paperHalomonadaceae107 claims · 51 papersHalothecacae2 claims · 1 paperHapalosiphonaceae3 claims · 3 papersHelicobacteraceae10 claims · 9 papersHeliobacteriaceae4 claims · 2 papersHerpetosiphonaceae3 claims · 1 paperHolophagaceae2 claims · 1 paperHydrogenophilaceae2 claims · 2 papersHymenobacteraceae16 claims · 14 papersHyphomicrobiaceae11 claims · 11 papersHyphomonadaceae2 claims · 2 papersIamiaceae1 claim · 1 paperIdiomarinaceae1 claim · 1 paperIntrasporangiaceae18 claims · 13 papersIsosphaeraceae4 claims · 3 papersJohnevansiaceae (SeqCode)6 claims · 3 papersJonesiaceae1 claim · 1 paperKaistiaceae2 claims · 2 papersKineosporiaceae12 claims · 7 papersKofleriaceae19 claims · 17 papersKribbellaceae1 claim · 1 paperKtedonobacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperLachnospiraceae13 claims · 11 papersLactobacillaceae824 claims · 371 papersLeptolyngbyaceae15 claims · 4 papersLeptotrichiaceae3 claims · 3 papersListeriaceae277 claims · 165 papersLongimicrobiaceae1 claim · 1 paperLysobacteraceae16,016 claims · 5,568 papersMarinilabiliaceae1 claim · 1 paperMarinobacteraceae7 claims · 3 papersMerismopediaceae4 claims · 2 papersMethylobacteriaceae612 claims · 248 papersMethylococcaceae9 claims · 6 papersMethylocystaceae13 claims · 10 papersMethylophilaceae16 claims · 11 papersMethylopilaceae5 claims · 2 papersMicrobacteriaceae2,027 claims · 772 papersMicrococcaceae663 claims · 381 papersMicrocoleaceae19 claims · 6 papersMicrocystaceae76 claims · 30 papersMicromonosporaceae142 claims · 65 papersMicropepsaceae7 claims · 5 papersMicroscillaceae2 claims · 1 paperMoraxellaceae474 claims · 243 papersMorganellaceae359 claims · 190 papersMuribaculaceae4 claims · 3 papersMycobacteriaceae124 claims · 81 papersMycoplasmataceae49 claims · 18 papersMyxococcaceae26 claims · 10 papersNakamurellaceae2 claims · 2 papersNannocystaceae4 claims · 3 papersNeisseriaceae3 claims · 3 papersNevskiaceae5 claims · 5 papersNitrobacteraceae5,495 claims · 2,075 papersNitrosomonadaceae51 claims · 37 papersNitrospiraceae55 claims · 49 papersNocardiaceae121 claims · 61 papersNocardioidaceae51 claims · 42 papersNocardiopsidaceae18 claims · 13 papersNodosilineaceae1 claim · 1 paperNodulariaceae1 claim · 1 paperNostocaceae508 claims · 185 papersObscuribacteraceae (SeqCode)1 claim · 1 paperOceanospirillaceae7 claims · 4 papersOpitutaceae2 claims · 2 papersOrbaceae3 claims · 3 papersOscillatoriaceae20 claims · 10 papersOscillospiraceae24 claims · 16 papersOxalobacteraceae575 claims · 248 papersPaenibacillaceae1,517 claims · 660 papersPaludibacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperParacoccaceae52 claims · 21 papersPasteurellaceae17 claims · 10 papersPasteuriaceae411 claims · 136 papersPatulibacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperPectobacteriaceae4,916 claims · 1,653 papersPedosphaeraceae1 claim · 1 paperPeptoniphilaceae1 claim · 1 paperPeptostreptococcaceae6 claims · 5 papersPhyllobacteriaceae1,429 claims · 545 papersPirellulaceae4 claims · 4 papersPlanctomycetaceae4 claims · 4 papersPleomorphomonadaceae27 claims · 8 papersPleurocapsaceae1 claim · 1 paperPolyangiaceae5 claims · 4 papersPorphyromonadaceae5 claims · 4 papersPrevotellaceae15 claims · 13 papersProchlorococcaceae1 claim · 1 paperPromicromonosporaceae18 claims · 13 papersPropionibacteriaceae55 claims · 36 papersPseudoalteromonadaceae5 claims · 5 papersPseudobdellovibrionaceae10 claims · 8 papersPseudomonadaceae28,791 claims · 11,395 papersPseudonocardiaceae71 claims · 49 papersPyrinomonadaceae1 claim · 1 paperReyranellaceae3 claims · 3 papersRhizobiaceae23,500 claims · 8,468 papersRhizonemataceae2 claims · 1 paperRhodanobacteraceae109 claims · 73 papersRhodobiaceae2 claims · 2 papersRhodoblastaceae2 claims · 1 paperRhodocyclaceae16 claims · 12 papersRhodoligotrophaceae1 claim · 1 paperRhodospirillaceae24 claims · 14 papersRhodovibrionaceae1 claim · 1 paperRickettsiaceae21 claims · 9 papersRikenellaceae4 claims · 2 papersRoseiarcaceae3 claims · 3 papersRoseiflexaceae2 claims · 2 papersRubrobacteraceae9 claims · 7 papersSandaracinaceae1 claim · 1 paperSanguibacteraceae2 claims · 2 papersSaprospiraceae3 claims · 2 papersScytonemataceae5 claims · 4 papersSedimenticolaceae2 claims · 1 paperSelenomonadaceae3 claims · 3 papersShewanellaceae8 claims · 5 papersSirenicapillariaceae73 claims · 33 papersSolibacteraceae4 claims · 4 papersSolirubrobacteraceae10 claims · 8 papersSphaerotilaceae41 claims · 31 papersSphingobacteriaceae64 claims · 41 papersSphingobiaceae59 claims · 35 papersSphingomicrobiaceae1 claim · 1 paperSphingomonadaceae612 claims · 418 papersSphingopyxidaceae10 claims · 7 papersSphingorhabdaceae1 claim · 1 paperSpirillaceae2 claims · 2 papersSpirochaetaceae2 claims · 2 papersSpiroplasmataceae394 claims · 138 papersSpirosomataceae12 claims · 5 papersSporolactobacillaceae3 claims · 3 papersStaphylococcaceae1,902 claims · 1,401 papersSteroidobacteraceae11 claims · 10 papersSterolibacteriaceae3 claims · 2 papersStreptococcaceae256 claims · 168 papersStreptomycetaceae3,570 claims · 1,371 papersStreptosporangiaceae12 claims · 9 papersSuccinivibrionaceae5 claims · 3 papersSulfuricellaceae1 claim · 1 paperSulfurimonadaceae1 claim · 1 paperSulfurospirillaceae1 claim · 1 paperSulfurovaceae3 claims · 3 papersSymbiobacteriaceae1 claim · 1 paperSynechococcaceae1 claim · 1 paperSynergistaceae1 claim · 1 paperSyntrophobacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperTannerellaceae1 claim · 1 paperTepidisphaeraceae1 claim · 1 paperTerrimicrobiaceae1 claim · 1 paperThalassospiraceae1 claim · 1 paperThermoactinomycetaceae3 claims · 3 papersThermoanaerobacteraceae1 claim · 1 paperThermoanaerobaculaceae1 claim · 1 paperThermogemmatisporaceae1 claim · 1 paperThermomonosporaceae10 claims · 10 papersThermosporotrichaceae2 claims · 2 papersThermotogaceae1 claim · 1 paperThioalkalibacteraceae9 claims · 2 papersThiobacillaceae92 claims · 39 papersThioprofundaceae1 claim · 1 paperThiotrichaceae8 claims · 2 papersTolypothrichaceae2 claims · 2 papersTreponemataceae3 claims · 3 papersTrueperaceae2 claims · 2 papersTsukamurellaceae15 claims · 4 papersTuricibacteraceae2 claims · 1 paperVeillonellaceae2 claims · 2 papersVerrucomicrobiaceae7 claims · 5 papersVibrionaceae68 claims · 43 papersVicinamibacteraceae6 claims · 6 papersWeeksellaceae136 claims · 80 papersWoeseiaceae3 claims · 1 paperXanthobacteraceae360 claims · 132 papersYersiniaceae1,054 claims · 439 papersZoogloeaceae88 claims · 30 papersAbove family level8,097 claims · 4,561 papers
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wart microbiomes were enriched in Pseudomonas trivialis, a taxon potentially involved in pathogen-specific suppression.

Interactor
Pseudomonas trivialisPseudomonas trivialise0other
Outcome
Wart microbiomes were enrichede0

Verbatim

t0

“potato wart disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–63
e0

“Wart microbiomes were enriched in Pseudomonas trivialis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–965

Title

Decoding microbiome responses to quarantine potato wart disease: first insights into suppression and biocontrol by full-length 16S rRNA gene profiling and functional prediction

Ishraq Akbar; Yichao Shi; Bart T. L. H. van de Vossenberg; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1707759

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wart microbiomes were enriched in Bacillus atrophaeus, a taxon potentially involved in pathogen-specific suppression.

Interactor
Bacillus atrophaeusBacillus atrophaeuse0other
Outcome
Wart microbiomes were enrichede0

Verbatim

t0

“potato wart disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–63
e0

“Wart microbiomes were enriched in Pseudomonas trivialis and Bacillus atrophaeus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–989

Title

Decoding microbiome responses to quarantine potato wart disease: first insights into suppression and biocontrol by full-length 16S rRNA gene profiling and functional prediction

Ishraq Akbar; Yichao Shi; Bart T. L. H. van de Vossenberg; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1707759

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic communities converged toward a Proteobacteria-dominated core, particularly Pseudomonas, as development progressed.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
endophytic convergence toward a Proteobacteria-dominated coree0
Qualifier
particularly Pseudomonase0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“endophytic convergence toward a Proteobacteria-dominated core, particularly Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1162
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134

Title

Developmental Stage-Driven Niche Differentiation and Assembly of Rhizosphere and Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Helianthus annuus Under Saline–Alkaline Stress

Bo Liu; Tingting Lu; Ting Yao; et al. Microorganisms 2026. doi:10.3390/microorganisms14020404

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Functional predictions showed enhanced nitrogen-related metabolic potential during flowering, coinciding with enrichment and network centrality of Pseudomonas.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen-related metabolic potentiale0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
during floweringe0

Verbatim

e0

“Functional predictions revealed enhanced nitrogen-related metabolic potential during flowering, coinciding with enrichment and network centrality of Pseudomonas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1486
t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–134

Title

Developmental Stage-Driven Niche Differentiation and Assembly of Rhizosphere and Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Helianthus annuus Under Saline–Alkaline Stress

Bo Liu; Tingting Lu; Ting Yao; et al. Microorganisms 2026. doi:10.3390/microorganisms14020404

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycosylation profiles of apoplast nanoparticles and their N-glycoproteins in Arabidopsis undergo distinct remodeling upon infection with Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
infection with Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinereae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringaePseudomonas syringaee1pathogen
Second interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
glycosylation profiles of ANs and their N-glycoproteinse1
Direction
distinct remodelinge1

Verbatim

e1

“the glycosylation profiles of ANs and their N-glycoproteins undergo distinct remodeling upon infection with Pseudomonas syringae and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–616
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120

Title

N‐glycosylation profiles of apoplast nanoparticles modulate plant immune responses to different pathogens in Arabidopsis

Guanting Niu; Hao Lu; Tunyu Jian; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/jipb.70142

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrobacterium tumefaciens stimulation efficiently induced stolon regeneration and subsequent tuber development from potato leaf callus.

Organ / stage
leaf calluse0
Treatment
Agrobacterium tumefaciens stimulatione0
Interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0other
Outcome
stolon regeneration and subsequent tuber developmente0
Direction
inducese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Agrobacterium tumefaciens stimulation efficiently induces stolon regeneration and subsequent tuber development from potato leaf callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–560

Title

De novo stolon organogenesis in potato leaf callus elicited by Agrobacterium tumefaciens stimulus

Seung Yong Shin; Su‐Jin Park; Ji‐Sun Park; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2026. doi:10.1111/jipb.70203

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains effectively nodulated early maturing soybean varieties (MG00-000).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
indigenous strainse0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
nodulatee0

Verbatim

e0

“the indigenous strains can effectively nodulate early maturing soybean varieties (MG00-000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–441
t1

“Bradyrhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–25

Title

Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains enhance nodulation and yield of early maturing soybean in Belgium

Margo Vermeersch; Paul Quataert; Chris Van Waes; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1748102

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains significantly improved chlorophyll content of early maturing soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strainst1
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly improve chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–487
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88
t1

“Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33

Title

Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains enhance nodulation and yield of early maturing soybean in Belgium

Margo Vermeersch; Paul Quataert; Chris Van Waes; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1748102

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains significantly improved shoot biomass, grain yield and protein content of early maturing soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strainst1
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomass, grain yield and protein contente0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly improve chlorophyll content and key agronomic traits, including shoot biomass, grain yield and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–570
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88
t1

“Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33

Title

Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains enhance nodulation and yield of early maturing soybean in Belgium

Margo Vermeersch; Paul Quataert; Chris Van Waes; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1748102

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences between the indigenous strains were detected in growth chamber experiments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
differences between strainse0
Setting
growth chamber experimentse0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences between strains were detected in growth chamber experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–664
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88
t1

“Bradyrhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–25

Title

Indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains enhance nodulation and yield of early maturing soybean in Belgium

Margo Vermeersch; Paul Quataert; Chris Van Waes; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1748102

Other claims from this paper (6)