View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional sandstorm hour during the winter wheat growing season corresponded to a 1.4% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Each additional hour of sandstorm during the winter wheat growing season corresponds to a 1.4% decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–728 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed review summary negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Climate change is estimated to decrease wheat yield by 10-14%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “By changing the environmental parameters, it is estimated that CC will lead to a 10-14% decrease in wheat yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–591 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
Treatmentapplication of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 4M:6S ratio did not decrease subsequent wheat yield .
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “but it did not decrease yield of wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1779 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
MaterialCultivars with the largest yield e0 Directionlargest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
For winter wheat, a gradual increase in air temperature resulted in a simulated yield decrease .
Treatmentgradual increase in air temperature e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For winter wheat, a gradual increase in air temperature resulted in a yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–835 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each one percent higher virus incidence corresponded to a 55 or 72 kg/ha yield decrease .
Interactorvirus e0 pathogen Verbatim
e0 “for each 1% increase in virus incidence, there was a yield decrease of 55 or 72 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1959 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease of wheat increased with subsoil Al.
Verbatim
e0 “toxicity on wheat growth were studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–149 e3 “the yield decrease increased with subsoil Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–979 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorsulfuron did not decrease mature grain nutrient concentrations or grain yield .
TreatmentChlorsulfuron treatment e0 Outcomenutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Chlorsulfuron treatment did not decrease nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–734 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further raising CO2 from 2600 to 10000 micromoles mol-1 produced a smaller further decrease in those yield traits.
Treatment10000 micromoles mol-1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Further elevation of [CO2] from 2600 to 10000 micromoles mol-1 caused a further but smaller decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1179 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.
Outcomerelative Y decrease with mean CWSI e5 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 e5 “for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants damaged in the fall showed a marked decrease in grain yield at spring harvest.
TreatmentPlants damaged in the fall e5 Outcomegrain yield at spring harvest e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “hard red winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–217 e5 “Plants damaged in the fall appeared to recover, but ultimately exhibited a marked decrease in grain yield at spring harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–754 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen up to 125 lbs. per acre produced neither a wheat yield increase nor decrease in McPherson County under dry conditions.
Treatmentnitrogen rates up to 125 e0 DirectionNeither a yield increase of a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Wheat in McPherson Co. and corn in Day Co. received nitrogen rates up to 125 and 150 lbs. per acre. Neither a yield increase of a yield decrease was measure at either location. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–473 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
QualifierThis decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing simazino rates tended to decrease wheat yield .
TreatmentIncreasing rates of simazino e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “it tended to decrease wheat yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–289 e1 “Increasing rates of simazino ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–208 t0 “Maize - Wheat Rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not decrease significantly until more than 60 cm of plot area was removed.
Treatmentmore than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed e0 Outcomeyield of the genotypes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Generally, no significant decrease in yield of the genotypes was detected until more than 60 cm (12.5%) of plot area was removed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–544 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Slightly damaged wheat fields had no actual yield decrease .
Settingslightly damaged field e0 Verbatim
e0 “Actual decrease in yield was not found in the slightly damaged field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1862 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
May fertilizer failed to decrease take-all.
TreatmentFertilizer applied in May e0 Directionfailed to decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fertilizer applied in May increased weed growth, failed to decrease take‐all ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1434 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–106 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intermediate damage reduced wheat yield by about 30%.
Settingintermediately suffered e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of about 30% and 70% in yield was found in the intermediately suffered and severely suffered field respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1989 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The higher protein was accompanied by lower grain yield .
Verbatim
e0 “this increase was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in yield of grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–570 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–52 e1 “The simazine treatments significantly affected both yield and percent protein ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–288 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decline was mainly attributable to heads per square metre.
Qualifierdifferences in the number of heads per sq metre e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was due mainly to differences in the number of heads per sq metre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1042 t0 “wheat crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Inadequate phosphorus decrease d middlings content.
Treatmentinadequately supplied with phosphorus e0 Outcomemiddlings content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When wheat is inadequately supplied with phosphorus a sharp rise in gluten yield and decrease in middlings content occurs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1153 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional inch of rain caused a greater average wheat yield decrease in 1854–77 than across 1854–1918.
Treatmentmanured solely in the autumn e0 SettingRothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden t0 Verbatim
e0 “In the years 1854–77, when plots were manured solely in the autumn, the average decrease in yield caused by each additional inch of rain is greater than the average decrease from 1854–1918 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–355 t0 “wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–120 Other claims from this paper (1) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease from sulphate of ammonia is ascribed to more lodging and a greater incidence of foot rot.
Outcomereduction in yield e2 Qualifiermore lodging and greater incidence of e4 Verbatim
e1 “study the effect of the time of application of sulphate of ammonia to autumn-sown wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–161 e2 “in those three cases sulphate of ammonia decrease d yield , irrespective of time of application; the reduction in yield was of the order of 10 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–418 e4 “is ascribed to more lodging and greater incidence of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–476 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tuscan wheat depressed the yield characters of the lines it was blended with, compared with those lines grown alone.
Treatmentwith which it was blended e4 Outcomeyield characters of the lines e4 Directiondecrease inferred e4 Comparatorwhen grown by themselves e5 Verbatim
t0 “New Zealand wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–52 e0 “a blend of Tuscan wheat with a high quality line ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–83 e4 “Tuscan demonstrated its aggressiveness by depressing in every case the yield characters of the lines with which it was blended ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–981 e5 “The yield characters of the components of blends were compared with their yield characters when grown by themselves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–628 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
N120-180 fertilizer sometimes decrease d winter wheat yield under drought during grain swelling and formation.
Qualifierdrought conditions during grain swelling and formation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “it can even cause the yield decrease in drought conditions during grain swelling and formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–864 e1 “the increase of applied nitrogen share up to N120-180 as part of complete fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–660 t0 “winter wheat yield after sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–65 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.