Paper · 1993 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The impact of chlorsulfuron and diclofop-methyl on nutrient uptake by wheat.

LD Osborne; AD Robson; DG Bowran

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of the herbicides chlorsulfuron and diclofop-methyl on nutrient uptake and utilization by wheat was examined in two glasshouse and one field experiment. In the glasshouse, chlorsulfuron decreased shoot weight, root weight and root length. Phosphorus uptake was decreased by chlorsulfuron, especially when combined with low phosphorus supply. Uptake of potassium was also decreased while uptake of nitrogen, calcium and magnesium was not affected. Under field conditions, chlorsulfuron decreased concentrations of a range of elements in plant shoots during early growth by up to 30%. This effect faded with increasing plant age. Chlorsulfuron treatment did not decrease nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield. The elements in order of decreasing sensitivity to chlorsulfuron application were: macro-elements phosphorus, potassium > nitrogen, sulfur > calcium, magnesium and micro-elements zinc, copper > manganese > iron. There were differences in sensitivity to chlorsulfuron treatment between cultivars; Kulin was more sensitive than Reeves. Diclofop-methyl application had little effect on nutrient concentration in plant shoots. Zinc and copper concentrations were reduced in vegetative growth, although only copper concentrations were reduced in mature grain of Kulin. The uptake of nutrients which principally move to plant roots by diffusion was decreased more by herbicides than the uptake of nutrients which principally move by mass flow. It is therefore likely that the herbicides are modifying the ability of roots to explore soil rather than decreasing absorption at the root surface.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron decreased wheat shoot and root weights and root length in glasshouse experiments.

Treatment
chlorsulfurone0
Outcome
shoot weight, root weight and root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the glasshouse, chlorsulfuron decreased shoot weight, root weight and root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron decreased phosphorus uptake, particularly with low phosphorus supply.

Treatment
chlorsulfurone0
Outcome
Phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
low phosphorus supplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus uptake was decreased by chlorsulfuron, especially when combined with low phosphorus supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron decreased potassium uptake.

Treatment
chlorsulfuront1
Outcome
Uptake of potassiume0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of potassium was also decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“chlorsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen, calcium and magnesium uptake was unaffected.

Treatment
chlorsulfuront1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen, calcium and magnesiume0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uptake of nitrogen, calcium and magnesium was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“chlorsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field chlorsulfuron reduced shoot element concentrations during early growth by up to 30%.

Organ / stage
plant shoots during early growthe0
Treatment
chlorsulfurone0
Outcome
concentrations of a range of elementse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
up to 30%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, chlorsulfuron decreased concentrations of a range of elements in plant shoots during early growth by up to 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in shoot element concentrations faded as wheat aged.

Outcome
This effecte0
Direction
fadede0
Qualifier
increasing plant agee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect faded with increasing plant age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron did not decrease mature grain nutrient concentrations or grain yield.

Treatment
Chlorsulfuron treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron treatment did not decrease nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kulin was more sensitive to chlorsulfuron than Reeves.

Material
Kuline0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
Reevese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kulin was more sensitive than Reeves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl had little effect on shoot nutrient concentrations.

Treatment
Diclofop-methyl applicatione0
Outcome
nutrient concentration in plant shootse0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclofop-methyl application had little effect on nutrient concentration in plant shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl reduced zinc and copper concentrations during vegetative growth.

Organ / stage
vegetative growthe0
Treatment
diclofop-methylt1
Outcome
Zinc and copper concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc and copper concentrations were reduced in vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“diclofop-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl reduced copper concentration in mature Kulin grain.

Material
Kuline0
Organ / stage
mature graine0
Treatment
diclofop-methylt1
Outcome
copper concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only copper concentrations were reduced in mature grain of Kulin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“diclofop-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides reduced uptake of diffusion-moved nutrients more than mass-flow nutrients.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
uptake of nutrients which principally move to plant roots by diffusione0
Direction
decreased moree0
Comparator
nutrients which principally move by mass flowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of nutrients which principally move to plant roots by diffusion was decreased more by herbicides than the uptake of nutrients which principally move by mass flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

chlorsulfuron · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 12 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

diclofop-methyl · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

chlorsulfuron · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.