Paper · 1969 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

An analysis of the effects of nitrogen deficiency on the growth and yield of a Western Australian wheat crop

NJ Halse; EAN Greenwood; P Lapins; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A wheat crop was grown on a nitrogen-deficient sandy soil. Urea was supplied at rates of 0 (N0), 56 (N1), and 336 (N2) kg nitrogen/ha. In general, the relative growth rate (R) decreased with time. During the first half of the growing season R for N2 > N1 >> N0, but in August deficient plants recovered rapidly. The recovery was associated with the emergence of the second tiller, an increase in net assimilation rate and nitrogen uptake, and a decrease in nitrogen stress. There was no evidence that the recovery was due to an increase in mineralization of soil nitrogen. Nitrogen stress in treatment N0 decreased from 48% in July to 14% in September. By contrast, stress in treatment N1 increased rapidly from 6 to 23% during July and fell to 5% by September. Flower initiation in N0 plants was delayed 14 days and ear emergence was delayed 8 days compared with N1 plants. The grain yields of N0 and N1 plants were 30 and 60% respectively of those of N2 plants. The decrease was due mainly to differences in the number of heads per sq metre, although nitrogen deficiency also reduced the number of grains per head and the weight per grain. The duration of photosynthetic activity after anthesis was not affected by nitrogen treatments. Harvest index was highest on N0 treatment and similar on N1 and N2 treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate generally declined over time.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the relative growth rate (R) decreased with time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season relative growth rate ranked N2 above N1 and N0.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
Re0
Comparator
N1 >> N0e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first half of the growing season R for N2 > N1 >> N0, but in August deficient plants recovered rapidly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficient plants recovered rapidly in August.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
deficient plants recovered rapidlye0
Qualifier
in Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in August deficient plants recovered rapidly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery was associated with second tiller emergence, greater net assimilation and nitrogen uptake, and lower nitrogen stress.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
second tillere0
Outcome
recoverye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recovery was associated with the emergence of the second tiller, an increase in net assimilation rate and nitrogen uptake, and a decrease in nitrogen stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no evidence that greater soil nitrogen mineralization caused recovery.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
recoverye0
Qualifier
increase in mineralization of soil nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence that the recovery was due to an increase in mineralization of soil nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen stress under N0 fell from 48% in July to 14% in September.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N0e0
Outcome
Nitrogen stresse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
48% in July to 14% in Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen stress in treatment N0 decreased from 48% in July to 14% in September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress under N1 rose from 6 to 23% in July before falling to 5% in September.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N1e0
Outcome
stresse0
Direction
increased rapidlye0
Value
6 to 23% during Julye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress in treatment N1 increased rapidly from 6 to 23% during July and fell to 5% by September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N0 delayed flower initiation 14 days compared with N1.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N0e0
Outcome
Flower initiatione0
Direction
delayede0
Value
14 dayse0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower initiation in N0 plants was delayed 14 days and ear emergence was delayed 8 days compared with N1 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N0 delayed ear emergence 8 days relative to N1.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N0e0
Outcome
ear emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
8 dayse0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower initiation in N0 plants was delayed 14 days and ear emergence was delayed 8 days compared with N1 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N0 grain yield was 30% of N2 grain yield.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N0e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
30e0
Comparator
N2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields of N0 and N1 plants were 30 and 60% respectively of those of N2 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 grain yield was 60% of N2 grain yield.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
N2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields of N0 and N1 plants were 30 and 60% respectively of those of N2 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decline was mainly attributable to heads per square metre.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
decreasee0
Qualifier
differences in the number of heads per sq metree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease was due mainly to differences in the number of heads per sq metre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency reduced grains per head.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen deficiencye0
Outcome
number of grains per heade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen deficiency also reduced the number of grains per head and the weight per grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen deficiency reduced weight per grain.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen deficiencye0
Outcome
weight per graine0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen deficiency also reduced the number of grains per head and the weight per grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatments did not affect duration of photosynthetic activity after anthesis.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen treatmentse0
Outcome
duration of photosynthetic activity after anthesise0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of photosynthetic activity after anthesis was not affected by nitrogen treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was highest under N0 and similar under N1 and N2.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N0e0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
N1 and N2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was highest on N0 treatment and similar on N1 and N2 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.