Paper · 2003 · The Korean Journal of Crop Science

Responses of Pea Varieties to Rhizobium Inoculation: Nitrogenase Activity, Dry Matter Production and Nitrogen Uptake

A. R. M. Solaiman; M. Khondaker; Abdul Karim; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The responses of five varieties and three cultivars of pea (Pisum sativum) to Rhizobium inoculation on nodulation, growth, nitrogenase activity, dry matter production and N uptake were investigated. The pea varieties were IPSA Motorshuti-l, IPSA Motorshuti-2, IPSA Motorshuti-3, BARI Motorshuti-l, BARI Motorshuti-2 and the cultivars were 063, Local small and Local white. Fifty percent seeds of each pea variety/cultivar were inoculated with a mixture of Rhizobium inoculants at rate of 15g/kg seed and the remaining fifty percent seeds were kept uninoculated. The plants inoculated with Rhizobium inoculant significantly increased nodulation, growth, nitrogenase activity, dry matter production and N uptake. Among the varieties/cultivars, BARI Motorshuti-l performed best in almost all parameters including nitrogenase activity of root nodule bacteria of the crop. There were positive correlations among the number and dry weight of nodules (r=, ), nitrogenase activity of root nodule bacteria (r=, ), dry weight of shoot (r=, ), N content (r=, ) and N uptake (r=, ) by shoot both at flowering and pod filling stages of the crop, respectively. It was concluded that BARI Motorshuti-l in symbiotic association with Rhizobium inoculant performed best in recording nitrogenase activity, dry matter production and N uptake by pea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased pea nodulation, growth and nitrogenase activity.

Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobium inoculante0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation, growth, nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants inoculated with Rhizobium inoculant significantly increased nodulation, growth, nitrogenase activity, dry matter production and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased pea dry matter production and nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
inoculated with Rhizobium inoculante0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter production and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants inoculated with Rhizobium inoculant significantly increased nodulation, growth, nitrogenase activity, dry matter production and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BARI Motorshuti-l performed best on nearly all parameters.

Material
BARI Motorshuti-le0
Outcome
best in almost all parameters including nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BARI Motorshuti-l performed best in almost all parameters including nitrogenase activity of root nodule bacteria of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number and dry weight, nitrogenase activity, shoot dry weight, N content and N uptake were positively correlated at flowering and pod filling.

Organ / stage
flowering and pod filling stagese0
Interactor
root nodule bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
positive correlations among the number and dry weight of nodulese0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were positive correlations among the number and dry weight of nodules (r=, ), nitrogenase activity of root nodule bacteria (r=, ), dry weight of shoot (r=, ), N content (r=, ) and N uptake (r=, ) by shoot both at flowering and pod filling stages of the crop, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–74 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Rhizobium · physiology: enzyme activity · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

127 papers: 108 positive, 19 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.