Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Productivity, Quality and Soil Health as Influenced by Organic, Inorganic and Biofertilizer on Field Pea in Eastern Himalaya

Rakesh Kumar; B. C. Deka; Manoj Kumar; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive years of 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 to study the effect of biofertilizers in conjunction with organic and inorganic sources of nutrient management on productivity, quality and soil health on field pea at ICAR RC for NEH Region, Nagaland Centre Jharnapani, Nagaland, India. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with five nutrient sources in main plots and four treatment of biofertilizers with zinc in sub plots. Results indicated that the application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost significantly improved root nitrogen (N) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC) of roots, NA activates, seed yield (1153 and 1262 kg ha−1), straw yield (2182 and 2332 kg ha−1) in the year of 2010–2011 and 2011–2012, respectively. Nutrients (N, P, K, S and Zn) uptake by seed and straw, protein content, protein harvest, soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, P, K, S, Zn and economics significantly higher with 100% RDF through inorganic + 50% RDN through vermicompost during both the years. Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1 markedly enhanced the root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA), seed yield (1080 and 1193 kg ha−1), straw yield (1978 and 2128 kg ha−1), nutrients [N, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S) and zinc (Zn)] uptake, soil organic carbon (SOC) (%), and available N, P, K, S, and Zn of pea in both the years, respectively. These sources also give more income and benefit cost ratio per rupees invested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer plus vermicompost significantly improved pea root nitrogen, cation exchange capacity and nitrogenase activity.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicomposte1
Outcome
root nitrogen (N) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC) of roots, NA activatese1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost significantly improved root nitrogen (N) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC) of roots, NA activates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer and vermicompost treatment improved pea seed yield to 1153 and 1262 kg ha−1 in successive years.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicomposte1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Value
1153 and 1262 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost significantly improved root nitrogen (N) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC) of roots, NA activates, seed yield (1153 and 1262 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer and vermicompost treatment improved pea straw yield to 2182 and 2332 kg ha−1.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicomposte1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Value
2182 and 2332 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost significantly improved root nitrogen (N) content, cation exchange capacity (CEC) of roots, NA activates, seed yield (1153 and 1262 kg ha−1), straw yield (2182 and 2332 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus vermicompost significantly increased pea nutrient uptake and protein traits.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
100% RDF through inorganic + 50% RDN through vermicomposte1
Outcome
Nutrients (N, P, K, S and Zn) uptake by seed and straw, protein content, protein harveste1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrients (N, P, K, S and Zn) uptake by seed and straw, protein content, protein harvest, soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, P, K, S, Zn and economics significantly higher with 100% RDF through inorganic + 50% RDN through vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer plus vermicompost significantly increased soil organic carbon and available nutrients.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
100% RDF through inorganic + 50% RDN through vermicomposte1
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, P, K, S, Zne1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil organic carbon (SOC), available N, P, K, S, Zn and economics significantly higher with 100% RDF through inorganic + 50% RDN through vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation with zinc enhanced pea root nitrogen, cation exchange capacity and nitrogenase activity.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1e1
Outcome
root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA)e1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1 markedly enhanced the root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation with zinc enhanced pea seed yield to 1080 and 1193 kg ha−1.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1e1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
1080 and 1193 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1 markedly enhanced the root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA), seed yield (1080 and 1193 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation with zinc enhanced pea straw yield to 1978 and 2128 kg ha−1.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1e1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
1978 and 2128 kg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1 markedly enhanced the root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA), seed yield (1080 and 1193 kg ha−1), straw yield (1978 and 2128 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation with zinc enhanced pea nutrient uptake.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1e1
Outcome
nutrients [N, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S) and zinc (Zn)] uptakee1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed inoculation with biofertilizers along with 5 kg Zn ha−1 markedly enhanced the root N content, CEC of roots, nitrogenase activities (NA), seed yield (1080 and 1193 kg ha−1), straw yield (1978 and 2128 kg ha−1), nutrients [N, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S) and zinc (Zn)] uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1427 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

127 papers: 108 positive, 19 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.