Paper · 2014 · PubMed

Exogenous application of putrescine at pre-anthesis enhances the thermotolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Ranjeet R Kumar; Sushil K Sharma; Gyanendra K Rai; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Antioxidant enzymes, besides being involved in various developmental processes, are known to be important for environmental stress tolerance in plants. In this study, the effect of treatment of 2.5 mM putrescine (Put), heat stress (HS -42 degrees C for 2 h) and their combination on the expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible). We observed that 2.5 mM Put before HS significantly enhanced the transcript levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), cytoplasmic and peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX, pAPX) in both the cultivars. However, the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX and GR), as well as accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content) were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329 in response to the treatment 2.5 mM Put + HS. No significant change was observed in the proline accumulation in response to HS and combined treatment of 2.5 mM Put + HS. A decrease in the H2O2 accumulation, lipid peroxidation and increase in cell membrane stability (CMS) were observed in response to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment, as compared to HS treatment alone in both the cultivars; HDR77 was, however, more responsive to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment. Put (2.5 mM) treatment at pre-anthesis thus modulated the defense mechanism responsible for the thermotolerance capacity of wheat under the heat stress. Elicitors like Put, therefore, need to be further studied for temporarily manipulating the thermotolerance capacity of wheat grown under the field conditions in view of the impending global climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine before heat stress significantly enhanced transcript levels of SOD and CAT in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
2.5 mM Put before HSe1
Gene
superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT)e1
Outcome
transcript levelse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“2.5 mM Put before HS significantly enhanced the transcript levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), cytoplasmic and peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX, pAPX) in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine before heat stress significantly enhanced transcript levels of cAPX and pAPX in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
2.5 mM Put before HSe1
Gene
cytoplasmic and peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX, pAPX)e1
Outcome
transcript levelse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“2.5 mM Put before HS significantly enhanced the transcript levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), cytoplasmic and peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX, pAPX) in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Put plus heat stress, SOD, CAT and APX activities were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329.

Material
HDR77e0
Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HSe2
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APXe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
HD2329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX and GR), as well as accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content) were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329 in response to the treatment 2.5 mM Put + HS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Put plus heat stress, GR activity was higher in HDR77 than in HD2329.

Material
HDR77e0
Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HSe2
Outcome
GRe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
HD2329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX and GR), as well as accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content) were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329 in response to the treatment 2.5 mM Put + HS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Put plus heat stress, ascorbic acid and total thiol content were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329.

Material
HDR77e0
Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HSe2
Outcome
accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content)e2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
HD2329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e2

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX and GR), as well as accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content) were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329 in response to the treatment 2.5 mM Put + HS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation did not change significantly under heat stress or combined Put plus heat stress.

Treatment
combined treatment of 2.5 mM Put + HSe3
Outcome
proline accumulatione3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant change was observed in the proline accumulation in response to HS and combined treatment of 2.5 mM Put + HS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put plus heat stress decreased H2O2 accumulation and lipid peroxidation compared with heat stress alone.

Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HS treatmente4
Outcome
H2O2 accumulation, lipid peroxidatione4
Direction
decreasee4
Comparator
HS treatment alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e4

“A decrease in the H2O2 accumulation, lipid peroxidation and increase in cell membrane stability (CMS) were observed in response to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment, as compared to HS treatment alone in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put plus heat stress increased cell membrane stability compared with heat stress alone.

Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HS treatmente4
Outcome
cell membrane stability (CMS)e4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
HS treatment alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e4

“A decrease in the H2O2 accumulation, lipid peroxidation and increase in cell membrane stability (CMS) were observed in response to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment, as compared to HS treatment alone in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1263 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HDR77 was more responsive than HD2329 to Put plus heat stress treatment.

Material
HDR77e5
Treatment
2.5 mM Put + HS treatmente5
Outcome
more responsivee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars--HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–476 · show in text ↑
e5

“HDR77 was, however, more responsive to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1329 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis Put treatment modulated a defence mechanism responsible for the thermotolerance capacity of wheat.

Treatment
Put (2.5 mM) treatment at pre-anthesise6
Outcome
thermotolerance capacitye6
Qualifier
defense mechanisme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Put (2.5 mM) treatment at pre-anthesis thus modulated the defense mechanism responsible for the thermotolerance capacity of wheat under the heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1482 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Putrescine should be further studied for manipulating wheat thermotolerance under field conditions.

Outcome
thermotolerance capacitye7
Setting
field conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Elicitors like Put, therefore, need to be further studied for temporarily manipulating the thermotolerance capacity of wheat grown under the field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1641 · show in text ↑

putrescine · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

putrescine · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

putrescine · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

putrescine · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.