Paper · 2016 · Plant

Response of Triticum aestivum (L.) Plants Grown Under Cadmium Stress to Polyamines Pretreatments

Mostafa Mohamed Rady

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The role of exogenously-applied polyamines [i.e., spermine (Spm), spermidine (Spd) and putrescine (Put)] in the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants, and their effects on growth, yield and its components and changes in the osmoprotectant and endogenous Cd2+ concentrations and the contents of some nutrients in plants grown under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress were assessed. The efficiency of wheat plants to tolerate Cd2+ stress in terms of growth and yield characteristics was noticed to varying degrees with the three applied polyamines. The reasonable growth of Cd2+-stressed seedlings and consequently acceptable grain yield was correlated with the improvements in the concentrations of osmoprotectants and tissue health in terms of relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI), and reductions in electrolyte leakage (EL) and tissue Cd2+ concentration. Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress. In contrast, the Cd2+ concentration and EL were significantly reduced. However, the Cd2+-free control was the best treatment when compared to the all other stressed treatments. Seed soaking in 1.0 mM Put was the best, generating wheat plants that most tolerant to Cd2+ stress than those generated from the other two polyamines. Therefore, this study recommend to use the 1.0 mM Put, as seed soaking treatment for wheat to grow well under Cd2+ stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of Cd2+-stressed wheat were correlated with higher osmoprotectant concentrations.

Compound
osmoprotectantse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The reasonable growth of Cd2+-stressed seedlings and consequently acceptable grain yield was correlated with the improvements in the concentrations of osmoprotectants and tissue health in terms of relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI), and reductions in electrolyte leakage (EL) and tissue Cd2+ concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in electrolyte leakage and tissue Cd2+ concentration were correlated with Cd2+ stress tolerance of wheat.

Organ / stage
tissuee1
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL) and tissue Cd2+ concentratione1
Direction
reductionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The reasonable growth of Cd2+-stressed seedlings and consequently acceptable grain yield was correlated with the improvements in the concentrations of osmoprotectants and tissue health in terms of relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI), and reductions in electrolyte leakage (EL) and tissue Cd2+ concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–883 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm gave significantly better growth and yield characteristics, MSI and RWC than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
0.25 mM Spme1
Outcome
growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWCe1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm gave significantly better leaf photosynthetic pigment, osmoprotectant concentrations and nutrient contents than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
0.25 mM Spme1
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contentse1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 0.50 mM Spd gave significantly better growth and yield characteristics, MSI and RWC than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
0.50 mM Spde1
Outcome
growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWCe1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 0.50 mM Spd gave significantly better leaf photosynthetic pigment, osmoprotectant concentrations and nutrient contents than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
0.50 mM Spde1
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contentse1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 1.0 mM Put gave significantly better growth and yield characteristics, MSI and RWC than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
1.0 mM Pute1
Outcome
growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWCe1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 1.0 mM Put gave significantly better leaf photosynthetic pigment, osmoprotectant concentrations and nutrient contents than water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress.

Treatment
1.0 mM Pute1
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contentse1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
2.0 mM Cd2+ stresse1
Comparator
seed soaking with watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results show that, seed soaking in 0.25 mM Spm, 0.50 mM Spd or 1.0 mM Put generated significant better growth and yield characteristics, MSI, RWC, leaf photosynthetic pigment and osmoprotectant concentrations, and nutrient contents than seed soaking with water under 2.0 mM Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1170 · show in text ↑
e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd2+ concentration and electrolyte leakage were significantly reduced in the polyamine-treated wheat.

Outcome
Cd2+ concentration and ELe3
Direction
reducede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“In contrast, the Cd2+ concentration and EL were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Cd2+-free control was the best treatment compared with all other stressed treatments.

Treatment
Cd2+-free controle4
Outcome
best treatmente4
Direction
beste4
Comparator
all other stressed treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the improvement of cadmium (Cd2+) tolerance in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–167 · show in text ↑
e4

“the Cd2+-free control was the best treatment when compared to the all other stressed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in 1.0 mM Put gave wheat plants most tolerant to Cd2+ stress compared with the other two polyamines.

Treatment
1.0 mM Pute5
Outcome
tolerant to Cd2+ stresse5
Direction
moste5
Comparator
the other two polyaminese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Seed soaking in 1.0 mM Put was the best, generating wheat plants that most tolerant to Cd2+ stress than those generated from the other two polyamines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1498 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend seed soaking wheat in 1.0 mM Put to grow well under Cd2+ stress.

Outcome
use the 1.0 mM Put, as seed soaking treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“this study recommend to use the 1.0 mM Put, as seed soaking treatment for wheat to grow well under Cd2+ stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1621 · show in text ↑

spermine · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

spermidine · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

putrescine · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

putrescine · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spermidine · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

putrescine · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

spermine · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.