Paper · 2026 · Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Integrated Nutrient Management for Improving Fruit Quality and Soil Health in Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv Winter Dawn

Sunny Shokhanda; Rajesh Mor; Vijay Vijay; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Strawberry is a widely cultivated and economically important fruit crop valued for its flavour, colour, aroma, and adaptability. It is rich in vitamin C, vitamin A, fibre, and antioxidants, making it beneficial for human health and widely used both fresh and in processed products. The present investigation was conducted to evaluate the effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) on fruit quality attributes and soil nutrient status of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). The experiment consisted of eight nutrient management treatments comprising the recommended dose of fertilisers (RDF) alone and in combination with biofertilizers (Azotobacter and phosphate-solubilising bacteria) and humic acid (2%). The study revealed that integrated application of RDF along with biofertilizers and humic acid significantly improved fruit quality parameters such as total soluble solids (TSS), sugars, and TSS: acidity ratio, while reducing titratable acidity as compared to the control. The highest TSS, TSS:acidity ratio, total sugars, and reducing sugars were recorded under RDF 100% + Azotobacter + PSB + 2% humic acid. Soil chemical properties were also favourably influenced by INM treatments, with improved organic carbon content and enhanced availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium after harvest. The combined use of inorganic fertilisers with biofertilizers and humic acid proved superior over the sole application of chemical fertilisers in improving fruit quality and maintaining soil fertility. Thus, integrated nutrient management emerged as a sustainable and effective approach for enhancing strawberry productivity and soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated RDF, biofertilizers and humic acid significantly improved soluble solids, sugars and the soluble-solids-to-acidity ratio.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated application of RDF along with biofertilizers and humic acide0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), sugars, and TSS: acidity ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of RDF along with biofertilizers and humic acid significantly improved fruit quality parameters such as total soluble solids (TSS), sugars, and TSS: acidity ratio, while reducing titratable acidity as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated RDF, biofertilizers and humic acid reduced titratable acidity versus control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated application of RDF along with biofertilizers and humic acide0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of RDF along with biofertilizers and humic acid significantly improved fruit quality parameters such as total soluble solids (TSS), sugars, and TSS: acidity ratio, while reducing titratable acidity as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF 100% plus Azotobacter, PSB and humic acid gave the highest TSS, TSS-to-acidity ratio and sugars.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
RDF 100% + Azotobacter + PSB + 2% humic acide0
Outcome
TSS, TSS:acidity ratio, total sugars, and reducing sugarse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest TSS, TSS:acidity ratio, total sugars, and reducing sugars were recorded under RDF 100% + Azotobacter + PSB + 2% humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM improved soil organic carbon after harvest.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
INM treatmentse0
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chemical properties were also favourably influenced by INM treatments, with improved organic carbon content and enhanced availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM enhanced soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium availability after harvest.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
INM treatmentse0
Outcome
availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassiume0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil chemical properties were also favourably influenced by INM treatments, with improved organic carbon content and enhanced availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic fertilizer, biofertilizer and humic acid outperformed chemical fertilizer alone for fruit quality.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
combined use of inorganic fertilisers with biofertilizers and humic acide0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertiliserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined use of inorganic fertilisers with biofertilizers and humic acid proved superior over the sole application of chemical fertilisers in improving fruit quality and maintaining soil fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic fertilizer, biofertilizer and humic acid outperformed chemical fertilizer alone for soil fertility.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
combined use of inorganic fertilisers with biofertilizers and humic acide0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole application of chemical fertiliserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined use of inorganic fertilisers with biofertilizers and humic acid proved superior over the sole application of chemical fertilisers in improving fruit quality and maintaining soil fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.