Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: The nutrition of food is increasingly important to consumers. The popularity of organic food rests partly on the assumption that these products are healthier despite a lack of conclusive evidence. The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer amendments on parameters of strawberry fruit quality, in terms of sugar, macro‐ and micro‐nutrients concentrations, and total antioxidant capacity were compared. RESULTS: Treatments did not affect sugar content or total antioxidant capacity. Inorganic fertilizer treatments increased S and Mn content of berries compared to organic treatments. The K and P content of berries differed among years. CONCLUSIONS: Organic amendments did not increase the fruit quality of strawberries compared to inorganic amendments. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The organic and inorganic amendments did not affect sugar content or total antioxidant capacity of strawberries.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- organic and inorganic fertilizer amendmentse0
- Outcome
- sugar content or total antioxidant capacitye1
- Direction
- did not affecte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer amendments on parameters of strawberry fruit quality”
e1“Treatments did not affect sugar content or total antioxidant capacity”
Claim · model-written summary
Inorganic fertilizer increased sulphur and manganese contents of strawberries compared with organic treatments.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
- Treatment
- Inorganic fertilizere2
- Outcome
- S and Mn content of berriese2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- organic treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer amendments on parameters of strawberry fruit quality”
e2“Inorganic fertilizer treatments increased S and Mn content of berries compared to organic treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and phosphorus contents of strawberries differed among years.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
- Outcome
- K and P content of berriese3
- Qualifier
- differed among yearse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer amendments on parameters of strawberry fruit quality”
e3“The K and P content of berries differed among years”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic amendments did not increase strawberry fruit quality compared with inorganic amendments.
- Taxon
- strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae4
- Treatment
- Organic amendmentse4
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye4
- Direction
- did not increasee4
- Comparator
- inorganic amendmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Organic amendments did not increase the fruit quality of strawberries compared to inorganic amendments”
The same questions in other papers
other · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →organic · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.