Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Ecology

Microbial Biofertilization to Improve Yield and Quality of Strawberry

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Microorganisms inhabiting the soil and rhizosphere take part in biogeochemical cycles and enhance the availability of macronutrients leading to improved soil productivity and enhanced food production.This study was conducted to examine the effect of inoculation of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on phenological data, yield per plant and fruit quality characteristics of strawberry ( Duch) cv.'Chandler' during 2016 and 2017.Root inoculations with rhizobacteria significantly increased yield per plant Fragaria x ananassa (1.59-25.03%)and average fruit weight (1.00-12.86%)compared to control, whereas the bacterial inoculations did not affect dry weight of plant, fruit size and moisture content in strawberry cv.'Chandler'.The bacterial inoculations also increased soluble solid content (SSC),ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content in strawberry.The ascorbic acidand anthocyanin contents of fruits ranged from 38.70 ml /100ml (control) to 41.41 ml/ 100ml (CPS67), 39.90 ml/ 100ml (control) to 42.96 ml/ 100ml (CPS67), while TSS varied between 6.26% (control) and 7.45% (HMM57).Thus, inoculation ofrhizobacterial strains JMM15, HMM57, HMM92 and CPS67 have the potential to increase the yield and growth of strawberries and could provide a promising sustainable strategy to improve strawberry growth in low fertility soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial root inoculation increased strawberry yield per plant by 1.59-25.03% relative to control.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Root inoculations with rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.59-25.03%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root inoculations with rhizobacteria significantly increased yield per plant Fragaria x ananassa (1.59-25.03%)and average fruit weight (1.00-12.86%)compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial root inoculation increased average strawberry fruit weight by 1.00-12.86% relative to control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Root inoculations with rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.00-12.86%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root inoculations with rhizobacteria significantly increased yield per plant Fragaria x ananassa (1.59-25.03%)and average fruit weight (1.00-12.86%)compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations did not affect strawberry plant dry weight, fruit size, or moisture content.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
cv.'Chandler'e0
Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
dry weight of plant, fruit size and moisture contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bacterial inoculations did not affect dry weight of plant, fruit size and moisture content in strawberry cv.'Chandler'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased strawberry soluble solid content.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
soluble solid content (SSC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial inoculations also increased soluble solid content (SSC),ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased strawberry fruit ascorbic acid content, with reported values of 38.70 ml /100ml in control and 41.41 ml/ 100ml for CPS67.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.41 ml/ 100mle1
Qualifier
38.70 ml /100mle1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial inoculations also increased soluble solid content (SSC),ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ascorbic acidand anthocyanin contents of fruits ranged from 38.70 ml /100ml (control) to 41.41 ml/ 100ml (CPS67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased strawberry fruit anthocyanin content, reaching 42.96 ml/ 100ml for CPS67 versus 39.90 ml/ 100ml in control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.96 ml/ 100mle1
Qualifier
39.90 ml/ 100mle1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial inoculations also increased soluble solid content (SSC),ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“39.90 ml/ 100ml (control) to 42.96 ml/ 100ml (CPS67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry TSS reached 7.45% with HMM57 versus 6.26% in control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
HMM57e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
variede0
Value
7.45%e0
Qualifier
6.26%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS varied between 6.26% (control) and 7.45% (HMM57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose JMM15, HMM57, HMM92 and CPS67 inoculation to improve strawberry growth in low fertility soils.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
inoculation ofrhizobacterial strains JMM15, HMM57, HMM92 and CPS67e0
Outcome
improve strawberry growthe0
Setting
low fertility soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation ofrhizobacterial strains JMM15, HMM57, HMM92 and CPS67 have the potential to increase the yield and growth of strawberries and could provide a promising sustainable strategy to improve strawberry growth in low fertility soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1334 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.