Paper · 2026 · Plant Cell & Environment

DNA Methylation Shapes Seed‐Borne Microbiome and Proteome Responses During Early Maize‐Beneficial Bacteria Interactions

Pedro Igor Zocateli; Geovanna Vitória Olímpio; Felipe Astolpho de Almeida; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microorganism and plant interactions are crucial for development and environmental adaptation. Plant growth promoting bacteria enhance agricultural productivity in a sustainable manner, while epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation regulate gene expression and adaptive responses. The objective of this study is to determine how DNA hypomethylation influences early interactions between maize (Zea mays) and the endophytic diazotrophic bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae, particularly regarding plant growth, metabolism, and the root microbiome. Treatment with the hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) altered maize root morphology without affecting bacterial growth. Inoculation with H. seropedicae promoted plant growth and bacterial colonisation in root mucilage, with higher accumulation in 5-azaC treated roots. Global methylation analysis showed that bacterial inoculation modulates cytosine methylation in a manner similar to 5-azaC, suggesting a role in epigenetic regulation. Gene expression analysis of DNA methylation machinery confirmed that hypomethylation drives plant-microbe interactions. Root microbiome profiling revealed that 5-azaC disrupted microbial composition, which was partially restored by bacterial inoculation. Proteomic analysis identified 1,818 proteins and highlighted significant changes in metabolic pathways, especially carbon metabolism and the citric acid cycle. These findings demonstrate that DNA hypomethylation combined with bacterial interaction profoundly affects cellular and metabolic processes and provide insights for sustainable agricultural practices through epigenetic and microbial modulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5-azacytidine altered maize root morphology.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
5-azacytidinee0
Outcome
maize root morphologye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with the hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) altered maize root morphology without affecting bacterial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5-azacytidine did not affect bacterial growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
5-azacytidinee0
Outcome
bacterial growthe0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with the hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) altered maize root morphology without affecting bacterial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. seropedicae inoculation promoted maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculation with H. seropedicaee0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with H. seropedicae promoted plant growth and bacterial colonisation in root mucilage, with higher accumulation in 5-azaC treated roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. seropedicae inoculation promoted colonisation of root mucilage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculation with H. seropedicaee0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial colonisation in root mucilagee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with H. seropedicae promoted plant growth and bacterial colonisation in root mucilage, with higher accumulation in 5-azaC treated roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial accumulation was higher in 5-azaC treated roots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5-azaCe0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial colonisation in root mucilagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with H. seropedicae promoted plant growth and bacterial colonisation in root mucilage, with higher accumulation in 5-azaC treated roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation modulated cytosine methylation similarly to 5-azaC.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
H. seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee1symbiont
Outcome
cytosine methylatione0
Comparator
5-azaCe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Global methylation analysis showed that bacterial inoculation modulates cytosine methylation in a manner similar to 5-azaC, suggesting a role in epigenetic regulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize‐Beneficial Bacteria Interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation with H. seropedicae promoted plant growth and bacterial colonisation in root mucilage, with higher accumulation in 5-azaC treated roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–835 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA methylation gene expression supported a role for hypomethylation in plant-microbe interactions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
plant-microbe interactionse0
Qualifier
hypomethylatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis of DNA methylation machinery confirmed that hypomethylation drives plant-microbe interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5-azaC disrupted the maize root microbial composition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5-azaCe0
Outcome
microbial compositione0
Direction
disruptede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root microbiome profiling revealed that 5-azaC disrupted microbial composition, which was partially restored by bacterial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation partially restored maize root microbial composition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaee1symbiont
Outcome
microbial compositione0
Direction
partially restorede0
Comparator
5-azaCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root microbiome profiling revealed that 5-azaC disrupted microbial composition, which was partially restored by bacterial inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize‐Beneficial Bacteria Interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“the endophytic diazotrophic bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteomic analysis identified 1,818 proteins.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
proteinse0
Value
1,818 proteinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proteomic analysis identified 1,818 proteins and highlighted significant changes in metabolic pathways, especially carbon metabolism and the citric acid cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteomic analysis found significant changes in carbon metabolism and the citric acid cycle.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
carbon metabolism and the citric acid cyclee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proteomic analysis identified 1,818 proteins and highlighted significant changes in metabolic pathways, especially carbon metabolism and the citric acid cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

Herbaspirillum seropedicae · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Herbaspirillum seropedicae · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

inoculation · Herbaspirillum seropedicae · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.