Paper · 2026 · Horticulturae

Effects of Supplementary Microbial Inoculant and Bio-Organic Fertilizer Application on Fruit Quality of ‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit

Chang Wang; Wen Zhao; Ting Yong; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

It is widely recognized that microbial inoculants (MI) and bio-organic fertilizers (BOFs) containing beneficial microorganisms can play an important role in improving orchard soil properties and enhancing fruit quality. However, insufficient data regarding the relevant fruit quality effects hindered the supplementary MI and BOFs in kiwifruit cultivation. Using conventional fertilization management as the control, this study investigated the impacts of supplementary applications of MI and BOFs at two gradient dosages on the harvest-time quality and cold storage characteristics of ‘Puyu’ yellow-fleshed kiwifruit. Regarding leaf physiological indices and soil pH, MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments significantly elevated total chlorophyll content at 60 days after flowering (DAF) (the fruit expansion stage). Leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents declined gradually during fruit development, while MI-2.0 and BOF-10 treatments markedly promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF. Additionally, the MI-2.0 treatment significantly reduced 20–40 cm subsoil pH, which is favorable for kiwifruit plants that prefer acidic and slightly acidic conditions. On the other hand, appropriate doses of MI and BOF treatments exerted a significant effect on improving the quality of kiwifruit at the ripening stage. These effects were mainly manifested in the increased single fruit weight, firmness, dry matter content and total soluble solids (TSSs) of kiwifruit following MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments. Furthermore, MI-3.0 and BOF-10 notably elevated the fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the flesh; MI-2.0 and BOF treatments significantly increased citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the flesh. During cold storage, the BOF-20 treatment not only delayed the occurrence of the ethylene peak by 20 d and significantly reduced its peak value, but also alleviated the decline in total acid content at the middle storage stage (20–40 d). Additionally, MI-2.0 and BOF-20 treatments effectively delayed kiwifruit softening at the early storage stage (0–10 d), and MI treatments maintained a high AsA content in the core during 10–20 d of cold storage. MI and BOF fertilization treatments had little effect on the dynamic change trends of sucrose synthase (SuS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and acid invertase (AI) in kiwifruit during cold storage, only exerting significant effects at specific time points. In conclusion, supplementary applications of MI and BOFs could improve kiwifruit quality at the harvest stage by positively regulating the accumulation of dry matter, soluble sugars and organic acid contents, and also have the potential to enhance the storage performance of kiwifruit. These findings provide a scientific basis for establishing an effective fertilization regime for kiwifruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-3.0 raised leaf chlorophyll at 60 DAF.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
MI-3.0e0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
elevatede0
Qualifier
60 days after flowering (DAF)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding leaf physiological indices and soil pH, MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments significantly elevated total chlorophyll content at 60 days after flowering (DAF) (the fruit expansion stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 raised leaf chlorophyll at 60 DAF.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
elevatede0
Qualifier
60 days after flowering (DAF)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding leaf physiological indices and soil pH, MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments significantly elevated total chlorophyll content at 60 days after flowering (DAF) (the fruit expansion stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N, P and K declined during fruit development.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
Leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contentse0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
during fruit developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents declined gradually during fruit development, while MI-2.0 and BOF-10 treatments markedly promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-2.0 promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-2.0e0
Outcome
leaf P accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
20–100 DAFe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents declined gradually during fruit development, while MI-2.0 and BOF-10 treatments markedly promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-10 promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-10e0
Outcome
leaf P accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
20–100 DAFe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents declined gradually during fruit development, while MI-2.0 and BOF-10 treatments markedly promoted leaf P accumulation at 20–100 DAF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-2.0 reduced subsoil pH.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-2.0e0
Outcome
20–40 cm subsoil pHe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, the MI-2.0 treatment significantly reduced 20–40 cm subsoil pH, which is favorable for kiwifruit plants that prefer acidic and slightly acidic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-3.0 increased fruit weight, firmness, dry matter and soluble solids.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-3.0e0
Outcome
single fruit weight, firmness, dry matter content and total soluble solids (TSSs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were mainly manifested in the increased single fruit weight, firmness, dry matter content and total soluble solids (TSSs) of kiwifruit following MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 increased fruit weight, firmness, dry matter and soluble solids.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
single fruit weight, firmness, dry matter content and total soluble solids (TSSs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were mainly manifested in the increased single fruit weight, firmness, dry matter content and total soluble solids (TSSs) of kiwifruit following MI-3.0 and BOF-20 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-3.0 elevated fructose, glucose, sucrose and ascorbic acid in fruit.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-3.0e0
Outcome
fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the fleshe0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, MI-3.0 and BOF-10 notably elevated the fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the flesh; MI-2.0 and BOF treatments significantly increased citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the flesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-10 elevated fructose, glucose, sucrose and ascorbic acid in fruit.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-10e0
Outcome
fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the fleshe0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, MI-3.0 and BOF-10 notably elevated the fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the flesh; MI-2.0 and BOF treatments significantly increased citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the flesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-2.0 increased organic acids in fruit.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-2.0e0
Outcome
citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the fleshe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, MI-3.0 and BOF-10 notably elevated the fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the flesh; MI-2.0 and BOF treatments significantly increased citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the flesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF treatments increased organic acids in fruit.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF treatmentse0
Outcome
citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the fleshe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, MI-3.0 and BOF-10 notably elevated the fructose and glucose contents in both flesh and core, as well as sucrose and ascorbic acid (AsA) contents in the flesh; MI-2.0 and BOF treatments significantly increased citric and malic acids in the core and quinic acid in the flesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 delayed the ethylene peak by 20 d.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
occurrence of the ethylene peake0
Direction
delayede0
Value
20 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage, the BOF-20 treatment not only delayed the occurrence of the ethylene peak by 20 d and significantly reduced its peak value, but also alleviated the decline in total acid content at the middle storage stage (20–40 d).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 reduced the ethylene peak value.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
peak valuee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage, the BOF-20 treatment not only delayed the occurrence of the ethylene peak by 20 d and significantly reduced its peak value, but also alleviated the decline in total acid content at the middle storage stage (20–40 d).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 alleviated loss of total acid in mid storage.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
total acid contente0
Direction
alleviated the declinee0
Qualifier
20–40 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage, the BOF-20 treatment not only delayed the occurrence of the ethylene peak by 20 d and significantly reduced its peak value, but also alleviated the decline in total acid content at the middle storage stage (20–40 d).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI-2.0 delayed early storage softening.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI-2.0e0
Outcome
kiwifruit softeninge0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
0–10 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, MI-2.0 and BOF-20 treatments effectively delayed kiwifruit softening at the early storage stage (0–10 d), and MI treatments maintained a high AsA content in the core during 10–20 d of cold storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BOF-20 delayed early storage softening.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
BOF-20e0
Outcome
kiwifruit softeninge0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
0–10 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, MI-2.0 and BOF-20 treatments effectively delayed kiwifruit softening at the early storage stage (0–10 d), and MI treatments maintained a high AsA content in the core during 10–20 d of cold storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI maintained high core ascorbic acid during storage.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
coree0
Treatment
MI treatmentse0
Outcome
AsA contente0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
10–20 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, MI-2.0 and BOF-20 treatments effectively delayed kiwifruit softening at the early storage stage (0–10 d), and MI treatments maintained a high AsA content in the core during 10–20 d of cold storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2249 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MI and BOF had little effect on storage enzyme trends except at specific times.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
MI and BOF fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
dynamic change trends of sucrose synthase (SuS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and acid invertase (AI)e0
Direction
little effecte0
Qualifier
only exerting significant effects at specific time pointse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MI and BOF fertilization treatments had little effect on the dynamic change trends of sucrose synthase (SuS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and acid invertase (AI) in kiwifruit during cold storage, only exerting significant effects at specific time points.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2250–2509 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Puyu’ Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.