Paper · 2026 · Scientia Horticulturae

UVB acclimation promotes photosynthetic capacity without inhibition of biomass accumulation in cucumber

Yufeng Gao; Qian Zhang; Muhammad Azher Nawaz; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• UVB acclimation at the dose of 3 and 5 μmol m -2 s -1 promotes photosynthesis. • UVB acclimation increases the content of UV-absorbing compounds. • UVB acclimation enhances antioxidant capacity as affected by genotype. • UVB radiation (below 3 μmol m -2 s -1 ) does not reduce biomass accumulation. Cucumbers are distributed worldwide and are therefore exposed to varying levels of UVB radiation. However, the dose-response of cucumber to UVB radiation is unclear. Here, we examined the effects of different doses on photosynthetic performance, UV-absorbing compounds, antioxidant capacity, and growth in cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.). Three originated cultivars (Changchunmici, Hexin9, and Hexin66) were exposed to UVB radiation at the intensity of 0, 3, and 5 μmol m -2 s -1 for 13 days. Results showed that UVB acclimation led to significant increase in light-saturated photosynthetic rate ( A sat ), with a more pronounced effect in Changchunmici than Hexin9 and Hexin66. The increase in A sat was supported by greater chlorophyll concentration on a leaf basis and thicker leaf, as well as higher antioxidant capacity. Meanwhile, UVB acclimation promoted the accumulation of UV-absorbing compounds (e.g., phenolics, flavonoids, flavonol) irrespective of cultivars, contributing to an enhanced screening or/and defense capacity to cope with UVB radiation. UVB acclimation at any level did not cause the adverse effect on growth parameters (e.g. shoot dry weight, leaf area, and leaf mass area) in all cultivars, except Changchunmici under 5 μmol m -2 s -1 UVB. Thus, we conclude that UVB acclimation within a suitable radiation range does not inhibit cucumber growth, instead, promotes photosynthetic capacity. The study would provide extensive understanding of horticultural plant responses to UVB radiation, facilitating light environment optimization in protected horticulture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB acclimation significantly increased light-saturated photosynthetic rate, more in Changchunmici than the other cultivars.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Changchunmicie0
Treatment
UVB acclimatione0
Outcome
light-saturated photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Hexin9 and Hexin66e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UVB acclimation led to significant increase in light-saturated photosynthetic rate ( A sat ), with a more pronounced effect in Changchunmici than Hexin9 and Hexin66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB acclimation increased leaf chlorophyll concentration and thickness.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVB acclimatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration on a leaf basis and thicker leafe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater chlorophyll concentration on a leaf basis and thicker leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“UVB acclimation led to significant increase in light-saturated photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB acclimation increased antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVB acclimatione1
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“UVB acclimation led to significant increase in light-saturated photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB acclimation promoted UV-absorbing compound accumulation across cultivars.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVB acclimatione0
Outcome
accumulation of UV-absorbing compoundse0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
irrespective of cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UVB acclimation promoted the accumulation of UV-absorbing compounds (e.g., phenolics, flavonoids, flavonol) irrespective of cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB acclimation did not adversely affect growth parameters in most cultivars.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVB acclimation at any levele0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
did not cause the adverse effecte0
Qualifier
except Changchunmici under 5 μmol m -2 s -1 UVBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UVB acclimation at any level did not cause the adverse effect on growth parameters (e.g. shoot dry weight, leaf area, and leaf mass area) in all cultivars, except Changchunmici under 5 μmol m -2 s -1 UVB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

uv · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 10 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.