Paper · 1995 · HortScience

Influence of Ambient UV-A and UV-B on Growth, Chlorosis, and Flavonoid Content of Cucumber

Donald T. Krizek; Roman M. Mirecki; Steven J. Britz

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of ambient UV radiation on growth, chlorosis, and flavonoid content was examined in four cultivars of cucumber (`Ashley', `Poinsett', `Marketmore', and `Salad Bush'). Plants were grown from seed in UV exclusion chambers consisting of UV transmitting plexiglass (10% T, 285 nm), lined with 3- or 5-mil Llumar (10% T, 399 or 404 nm) to exclude UV-A and UV-B, 5-mil polyester (10%T, 319 nm) to exclude UVB, or cellulose acetate (10% T, 291 nm) to transmit UV-A and UV-B. Plants were grown in 15 cm plastic pots containing vermiculite and were fertilized daily with nutrient solution. Despite their differential sensitivity to supplemental UV-B radiation, all four cultivars responded similarly to the exclusion treatments. After 19 to 21 days, plants grown under ambient UV-A and UV-B generally had less stem, leaf, and root biomass and less total height and total leaf area than those grown under conditions in which UV-A and UV-B or only UV-B was excluded. Flavonoid content, leaf number, and floral development were unaffected by UV. These findings demonstrate the extreme sensitivity of cucumber to current levels of solar UV radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four cucumber cultivars responded similarly to UV exclusion.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
responded similarly to the exclusion treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all four cultivars responded similarly to the exclusion treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient UV-A and UV-B reduced cucumber stem biomass relative to UV exclusion.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ambient UV-A and UV-Be0
Outcome
stem, leaf, and root biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
UV-A and UV-B or only UV-B was excludede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown under ambient UV-A and UV-B generally had less stem, leaf, and root biomass and less total height and total leaf area than those grown under conditions in which UV-A and UV-B or only UV-B was excluded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient UV reduced cucumber height and leaf area relative to exclusion.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
ambient UV-A and UV-Be0
Outcome
total height and total leaf areae0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
UV-A and UV-B or only UV-B was excludede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown under ambient UV-A and UV-B generally had less stem, leaf, and root biomass and less total height and total leaf area than those grown under conditions in which UV-A and UV-B or only UV-B was excluded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV did not affect cucumber flavonoid content.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVe0
Outcome
Flavonoid contente0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonoid content, leaf number, and floral development were unaffected by UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV did not affect cucumber leaf number.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVe0
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonoid content, leaf number, and floral development were unaffected by UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV did not affect cucumber floral development.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
UVe0
Outcome
floral developmente0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavonoid content, leaf number, and floral development were unaffected by UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 10 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.