Paper · 2026 · Plant Signaling & Behavior

Synergistic application of melatonin and methyl jasmonate mitigates drought-induced oxidative and photosynthetic impairment in Brassica napus

Hamzeh Amiri; Parvaneh Hemmati Hassan Gavyar

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress severely limits rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and productivity by disrupting photosynthetic efficiency and inducing oxidative damage. This study investigated the potential of melatonin (MT) and methyl jasmonate (MJ), individually and in combination, to mitigate drought-induced toxicity in rapeseed. Plants were subjected to drought stress (15% Polyethylene glycol 6000), followed by foliar application of MT (100 μM), MJ (100 μM), or their combination. Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited significantly reduced chlorophyll content (by 33.72% for chl a and 54.59% for chl b), impaired photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm decreased by 16.08%), and elevated oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ increased by 54.79%, MDA by 144.6%, ROS by 43.96%). The combined application of MT and MJ conferred the highest level of drought tolerance, increasing shoot fresh weight by 92.33% and root dry weight by 405% compared to the stressed control. This synergistic treatment effectively enhanced stomatal conductance by 76.25%, increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by 71.45%, and boosted key antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., POD by 216%). The enhanced efficacy of the dual treatment compared to individual applications strongly indicates coordinated signaling between MT and MJ pathways in stress response modulation. These results demonstrate that simultaneous application of these plant growth regulators offers an effective physiological strategy to improve rapeseed performance under water deficit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced chlorophyll a by 33.72%.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chl ae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
33.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited significantly reduced chlorophyll content (by 33.72% for chl a and 54.59% for chl b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced chlorophyll b by 54.59%.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chl be0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54.59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited significantly reduced chlorophyll content (by 33.72% for chl a and 54.59% for chl b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased Fv/Fm by 16.08%.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.08%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“impaired photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm decreased by 16.08%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased H₂O₂ by 54.79%.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
H₂O₂e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54.79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“elevated oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ increased by 54.79%, MDA by 144.6%, ROS by 43.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought elevated MDA by 144.6%.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
144.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“elevated oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ increased by 54.79%, MDA by 144.6%, ROS by 43.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought elevated ROS by 43.96%.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
ROSe0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
43.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“elevated oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ increased by 54.79%, MDA by 144.6%, ROS by 43.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought stress, rapeseed exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined MT and MJ increased shoot fresh weight by 92.33% relative to stressed controls.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
combined application of MT and MJe0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
92.33%e0
Comparator
stressed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of MT and MJ conferred the highest level of drought tolerance, increasing shoot fresh weight by 92.33% and root dry weight by 405% compared to the stressed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined MT and MJ increased root dry weight by 405% relative to stressed controls.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
combined application of MT and MJe0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
405%e0
Comparator
stressed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of MT and MJ conferred the highest level of drought tolerance, increasing shoot fresh weight by 92.33% and root dry weight by 405% compared to the stressed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment gave the highest drought tolerance.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
combined application of MT and MJe0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of MT and MJ conferred the highest level of drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment enhanced stomatal conductance by 76.25%.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
synergistic treatmente0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
76.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This synergistic treatment effectively enhanced stomatal conductance by 76.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased net photosynthetic rate by 71.45%.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
synergistic treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This synergistic treatment effectively enhanced stomatal conductance by 76.25%, increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by 71.45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment boosted POD activity by 216%.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
synergistic treatmente0
Outcome
PODe0
Direction
boostede0
Value
216%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This synergistic treatment effectively enhanced stomatal conductance by 76.25%, increased net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by 71.45%, and boosted key antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., POD by 216%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Greater efficacy of combined treatment suggests coordinated MT and MJ signaling in stress response.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Outcome
stress response modulatione0
Qualifier
coordinated signaling between MT and MJ pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhanced efficacy of the dual treatment compared to individual applications strongly indicates coordinated signaling between MT and MJ pathways in stress response modulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–141 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous growth regulator application is proposed as an effective strategy to improve rapeseed under water deficit.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Outcome
simultaneous application of these plant growth regulatorse0
Qualifier
water deficit conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“simultaneous application of these plant growth regulators offers an effective physiological strategy to improve rapeseed performance under water deficit conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1523 · show in text ↑

melatonin · tolerance: abiotic · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

melatonin · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 2 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 5 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.