Paper · 2020 · Chemistry & Biodiversity

Effect of Drought Stress on Certain Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of a Resistant and a Sensitive Canola Cultivar

Ghorban Khodabin; Zeinolabedin Tahmasebi‐Sarvestani; Amir Hossein Shirani Rad; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
48
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water stress is one of the main abiotic factors that reduces plant growth, mainly due to high evaporative demand and low water availability. In order to evaluate the effects of drought stress on certain morphological and physiological characteristics of two canola cultivars, we conducted a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design. The findings show that drought stress exacerbations result in the plant's response to stress due to increased canola resistance caused by changes in plant pigments, proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde, glucose, galactose, rhamnose and xylose. These in turn ultimately influence the morphological characteristics of canola. Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls; however, glucose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose, proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde (in leaves and roots) and the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased. Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively. From the two canola cultivars, the morphological characteristics of the NIMA increased compared to the Ks7 cultivar. Interaction effects of cultivar and drought stress showed that NIMA cultivar without treatment had the highest number of morphological characteristics such as carotenoid concentration, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls a and b, whereas the cultivar with 300 g/l PEG (drought stress) had the highest amount of proline, malondialdehyde, soluble sugars and enzymes in leaves and roots. Increasing activity of oxidative enzymes and soluble sugars in canola under drought stress could be a sign of their relative tolerance to drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress lowered canola carotenoid and chlorophyll concentrations.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
concentration of carotenoids, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyllse0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased sugars and proline in canola.

Treatment
Drought stresse2
Outcome
glucose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose, prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“however, glucose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose, proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde (in leaves and roots) and the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and peroxidase in canola.

Treatment
Drought stresse2
Outcome
catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde (in leaves and roots) and the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde in canola leaves and roots.

Treatment
Drought stresse2
Outcome
superoxide dismutase, malondialdehydee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde (in leaves and roots) and the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased the chlorophyll a and b ratios.

Treatment
Drought stresse2
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1051 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 g/l PEG, plant height was reduced by 0.264 versus no treatment.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.264e0
Comparator
non-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 g/l PEG, stem height was reduced by 0.236 versus no treatment.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.236e0
Comparator
non-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 g/l PEG, root length was reduced by 0.394 versus no treatment.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.394e0
Comparator
non-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 g/l PEG, fresh weight was reduced by 0.183 versus no treatment.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.183e0
Comparator
non-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 g/l PEG, dry weight was reduced by 0.395 versus no treatment.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
0.395e0
Comparator
non-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NIMA had greater morphological characteristics than Ks7.

Material
NIMAe0
Outcome
morphological characteristicse0
Comparator
Ks7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From the two canola cultivars, the morphological characteristics of the NIMA increased compared to the Ks7 cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated NIMA had the highest carotenoid and chlorophyll concentrations among cultivar-stress combinations.

Material
NIMAe0
Outcome
carotenoid concentration, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls a and be0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NIMA cultivar without treatment had the highest number of morphological characteristics such as carotenoid concentration, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls a and b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar under 300 g/l PEG had the highest proline, malondialdehyde, soluble sugar, and enzyme amounts in leaves and roots.

Treatment
300 g/l PEGe0
Outcome
proline, malondialdehyde, soluble sugars and enzymese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar with 300 g/l PEG (drought stress) had the highest amount of proline, malondialdehyde, soluble sugars and enzymes in leaves and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1758 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 11 positive, 52 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 5 positive, 22 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.