Abstract
1. High dose ethephon compensates for the efficacy loss of conventional dose ethephon caused by drip fertigation in maize by prolonging the effect duration. 2. High dose ethephon compensates for drip fertigation-induced decline in basal internode quality in maize by modulating hormonal balance and ethylene evolution, thereby enhancing lodging resistance. 3. The optimal ethephon concentration is 270 mg L −1 under traditional water–fertiliser (TWF) with only pre-sowing irrigation, TWF with supplemental drip irrigations, and drip irrigation with water–fertiliser integration (DIWF) without plastic - film mulching, whereas under DIWF with plastic - film mulching, the optimal concentration increases to 540 mg L −1 . Ethephon is widely applied in maize production to reduce centre of gravity and enhance lodging resistance; however, its efficacy is strongly influenced by site-specific irrigation and fertilisation regimes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of optimised ethephon concentrations on lodging resistance and yield under two contrasting management systems—traditional water–fertiliser (TWF) and drip irrigation with water–fertiliser integration (DIWF)—across two ecological regions (Wuqiao [WQ] and Baicheng [BC]). Field experiments were conducted in 2023 and 2024 at WQ and in 2024 at BC, using two maize hybrids (Woyu 3 [WY3] and Jingnongke 728 [JNK728]) and three ethephon concentrations (0 mg L −1 [CK], 270 mg L −1 [E270], and 540 mg L −1 [E540]). DIWF_E270 (DIWF with 270 mg L −1 ethephon) shortened the effect duration by 1.9 d at both ecological sites, leading to increased ear height, reduced stalk quality, and significantly higher lodging rates compared with those in TWF_E270. However, DIWF_E540 exhibited a compensatory effect—prolonging the effect duration by 3.6 d in WQ and 4.9 d in BC compared with that in DIWF_E270. The prolonged effective duration of ethephon optimised basal internode morphology (decreased length, increased cross-sectional area, and greater mass density) and quality (increased rind penetration strength, breaking strength, and lignin deposition) by increasing ethylene evolution while suppressing gibberellin and auxin concentrations. These changes improved plant architecture traits (lower plant height, ear height, centre of gravity height, and ear ratio) and significantly reduced lodging rate. However, its effects on yield varied by site and regime. Optimizing ethephon application strategies achieved the highest productivity. Under TWF with only pre-sowing irrigation, the optimal ethephon concentration was 270 mg L −1 , though it resulted in yield reduction. For TWF with supplemental drip irrigations and DIWF without plastic - film mulching, the optimal concentration remained 270 mg L −1 , increasing yields by 3.9 and by 4.3%, respectively. In contrast, under DIWF with plastic - film mulching, the optimal ethephon concentration was 540 mg L −1 , achieving a 6.5% yield increase. These findings suggest that adjusting ethephon concentrations to irrigation–fertilisation regimes optimise the balance between increased yield and lodging resistance, highlighting the potential of integrating chemical regulation strategies with local agronomic practices for sustainable maize production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E270 shortened ethephon effect duration by 1.9 d versus TWF_E270.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E270 (DIWF with 270 mg L −1 ethephon) shortened the effect duration by 1.9 d at both ecological sites, leading to increased ear height, reduced stalk quality, and significantly higher lodging rates compared with those in TWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E270 increased ear height versus TWF_E270.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E270 (DIWF with 270 mg L −1 ethephon) shortened the effect duration by 1.9 d at both ecological sites, leading to increased ear height, reduced stalk quality, and significantly higher lodging rates compared with those in TWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E270 reduced stalk quality versus TWF_E270.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E270 (DIWF with 270 mg L −1 ethephon) shortened the effect duration by 1.9 d at both ecological sites, leading to increased ear height, reduced stalk quality, and significantly higher lodging rates compared with those in TWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E270 raised lodging rates versus TWF_E270.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E270 (DIWF with 270 mg L −1 ethephon) shortened the effect duration by 1.9 d at both ecological sites, leading to increased ear height, reduced stalk quality, and significantly higher lodging rates compared with those in TWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E540 prolonged effect duration by 3.6 d in WQ versus DIWF_E270.
- Treatment
- DIWF_E540e0
- Outcome
- effect duratione0
- Direction
- prolonginge0
- Value
- 3.6 de0
- Comparator
- DIWF_E270e0
- Setting
- WQe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E540 exhibited a compensatory effect—prolonging the effect duration by 3.6 d in WQ and 4.9 d in BC compared with that in DIWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
DIWF_E540 prolonged effect duration by 4.9 d in BC versus DIWF_E270.
- Treatment
- DIWF_E540e0
- Outcome
- effect duratione0
- Direction
- prolonginge0
- Value
- 4.9 de0
- Comparator
- DIWF_E270e0
- Setting
- BCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DIWF_E540 exhibited a compensatory effect—prolonging the effect duration by 3.6 d in WQ and 4.9 d in BC compared with that in DIWF_E270”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Prolonged ethephon duration decreased basal internode length.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“prolonged effective duration of ethephon optimised basal internode morphology (decreased length, increased cross-sectional area, and greater mass density)”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Prolonged ethephon duration increased basal internode cross-sectional area and mass density.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“prolonged effective duration of ethephon optimised basal internode morphology (decreased length, increased cross-sectional area, and greater mass density)”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon raised rind penetration strength, breaking strength and lignin deposition.
- Treatment
- ethephont0
- Outcome
- rind penetration strength, breaking strength, and lignin depositione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality (increased rind penetration strength, breaking strength, and lignin deposition)”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon increased ethylene evolution.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by increasing ethylene evolution while suppressing gibberellin and auxin concentrations”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon suppressed gibberellin and auxin concentrations.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by increasing ethylene evolution while suppressing gibberellin and auxin concentrations”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon lowered plant height, ear height and centre of gravity height.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lower plant height, ear height, centre of gravity height, and ear ratio”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon lowered ear ratio.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lower plant height, ear height, centre of gravity height, and ear ratio”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon significantly reduced lodging rate.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly reduced lodging rate”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Under TWF with only pre-sowing irrigation, optimal ethephon was 270 mg L −1 but reduced yield.
- Treatment
- 270 mg L −1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Setting
- TWF with only pre-sowing irrigatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under TWF with only pre-sowing irrigation, the optimal ethephon concentration was 270 mg L −1 , though it resulted in yield reduction”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Under TWF with supplemental drip irrigations, 270 mg L −1 ethephon increased yield 3.9%.
- Treatment
- 270 mg L −1e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 3.9e0
- Setting
- TWF with supplemental drip irrigationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For TWF with supplemental drip irrigations and DIWF without plastic - film mulching, the optimal concentration remained 270 mg L −1 , increasing yields by 3.9 and by 4.3%, respectively”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Under DIWF without plastic film mulching, 270 mg L −1 ethephon increased yield 4.3%.
- Treatment
- 270 mg L −1e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 4.3%e0
- Setting
- DIWF without plastic - film mulchinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For TWF with supplemental drip irrigations and DIWF without plastic - film mulching, the optimal concentration remained 270 mg L −1 , increasing yields by 3.9 and by 4.3%, respectively”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Under DIWF with plastic film mulching, 540 mg L −1 ethephon increased yield 6.5%.
- Treatment
- 540 mg L −1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.5%e0
- Setting
- DIWF with plastic - film mulchinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under DIWF with plastic - film mulching, the optimal ethephon concentration was 540 mg L −1 , achieving a 6.5% yield increase”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors advise adjusting ethephon dose to irrigation and fertilisation regimes.
- Outcome
- adjusting ethephon concentrations to irrigation–fertilisation regimese0
- Qualifier
- balance between increased yield and lodging resistancee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“adjusting ethephon concentrations to irrigation–fertilisation regimes optimise the balance between increased yield and lodging resistance”
t0“ethephon application strategies for enhancing lodging resistance and yield in maize”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · physiology: hormones · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.