Paper · 2025 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

An evaluation of the efficacies of four (4) selected herbicides in controlling herbicide resistant weeds in cassava cultivation in Bebi Obanliku, cross river state, Nigeria

UNIM, MATHIAS USHUNDE; UGBE, LAWRENCE AHMED

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two year (2024 and 2025) trial was conducted at the Teaching and Research farm of the Federal College of Education Obudu, (Bebi Campus) Cross River State. The main objective was to compare the efficacies of four (4) selected herbicides in controlling noxious/herbicide resistant weeds in cassava varieties. The design of the experiment was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) on a four by four (4 x 4) factorial layout. The main plot treatments were the cassava varieties; TMS. 60444, TMS. 30555, TMS. 30572 and TMS. 60506. The subplot treatments were the herbicide types; Paraquat, Glyphosate, Atrazine, and Ametryn, all applied at 3.0 kg/ha. Application was done two weeks after planting of the cassava varieties. Data for percentage establishment of cassava were taken at four (4) weeks after planting (4WAP). Herbicide toxicity (injury) on the cassava and the weed control efficiency were recorded six (6) weeks after planting (6WAP). Tuber yield in tons per hectare (t/ha) were recorded at six (6) months after planting (6MAP) all data generated were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means were separated using Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 5 % level of probability. Results showed that herbicide toxicity rating on the cassava was higher in Atrazine> Glyphosate> Paraquat> Ametryn. Weed control efficiency rating of herbicides was Paraquat (97.40 %)> Glyphosate (85.87 %)> Ametryn (83.83 %)> Atrazine (62.07 %). The highest yields in t/ha were recorded in TMS. 30572 (4.30 t/ha) in application of Paraquat and (3.88 t/ha) in application of Glyphosate. Glyphosate and Ametryn gave significantly higher yields in almost all the varieties. Therefore it was recommended that Paraquat applied at 3.0 kg ai/ha should be the correct approach to dealing with noxious/herbicide resistant weeds. Two varieties of cassava TMS. 30572 and TMS. 30555 were also recommended to farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide toxicity rating on cassava was higher for Atrazine than for Glyphosate, Paraquat and Ametryn.

Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
herbicide toxicity ratinge0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide toxicity rating on the cassava was higher in Atrazine> Glyphosate> Paraquat> Ametryn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat gave the highest weed control efficiency at 97.40 %.

Treatment
Paraquate1
Interactor
herbicide resistant weedst1weed
Outcome
Weed control efficiencye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
97.40 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed control efficiency rating of herbicides was Paraquat (97.40 %)> Glyphosate (85.87 %)> Ametryn (83.83 %)> Atrazine (62.07 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1444 · show in text ↑
t1

“controlling herbicide resistant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–104 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate gave weed control efficiency of 85.87 %.

Treatment
Glyphosatee1
Interactor
herbicide resistant weedst1weed
Outcome
Weed control efficiencye1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
85.87 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed control efficiency rating of herbicides was Paraquat (97.40 %)> Glyphosate (85.87 %)> Ametryn (83.83 %)> Atrazine (62.07 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1444 · show in text ↑
t1

“controlling herbicide resistant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–104 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ametryn gave weed control efficiency of 83.83 %.

Treatment
Ametryne1
Interactor
herbicide resistant weedst1weed
Outcome
Weed control efficiencye1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
83.83 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed control efficiency rating of herbicides was Paraquat (97.40 %)> Glyphosate (85.87 %)> Ametryn (83.83 %)> Atrazine (62.07 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1444 · show in text ↑
t1

“controlling herbicide resistant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–104 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine gave weed control efficiency of 62.07 %.

Treatment
Atrazinee1
Interactor
herbicide resistant weedst1weed
Outcome
Weed control efficiencye1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
62.07 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Weed control efficiency rating of herbicides was Paraquat (97.40 %)> Glyphosate (85.87 %)> Ametryn (83.83 %)> Atrazine (62.07 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1444 · show in text ↑
t1

“controlling herbicide resistant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–104 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava TMS. 30572 gave the highest yield, 4.30 t/ha, under Paraquat.

Material
TMS. 30572e2
Treatment
Paraquate2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
4.30 t/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The highest yields in t/ha were recorded in TMS. 30572 (4.30 t/ha) in application of Paraquat and (3.88 t/ha) in application of Glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava yield of 3.88 t/ha was among the highest under Glyphosate application.

Treatment
Glyphosatee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.88 t/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The highest yields in t/ha were recorded in TMS. 30572 (4.30 t/ha) in application of Paraquat and (3.88 t/ha) in application of Glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate and Ametryn gave significantly higher yields in almost all cassava varieties.

Treatment
Glyphosate and Ametryne3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
significantly highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Glyphosate and Ametryn gave significantly higher yields in almost all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat applied at 3.0 kg ai/ha is recommended as the approach to dealing with noxious and herbicide-resistant weeds in cassava.

Treatment
Paraquat applied at 3.0 kg ai/hae4
Interactor
noxious/herbicide resistant weedse4weed
Outcome
dealing with noxious/herbicide resistant weedse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Paraquat applied at 3.0 kg ai/ha should be the correct approach to dealing with noxious/herbicide resistant weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1818 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava varieties TMS. 30572 and TMS. 30555 are recommended to farmers.

Material
TMS. 30572 and TMS. 30555e5
Outcome
recommended to farmerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Two varieties of cassava TMS. 30572 and TMS. 30555 were also recommended to farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1903 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cassava cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

paraquat · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ametryn · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ametryn · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

paraquat · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · pest · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.