Paper · 2012 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Management of tikka disease of groundnut by using different botanicals and bioagents.

PN Mane

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were carried out for studying the efficiency of leaf extracts of differents botanicals and culture filterates of bioagents for control of tikka diasease of groundnut. The use of leaf extracts of differents botanicals and boigagents was found to be effective. The kernel extract (5% conc.) of Azadirachta indica was found to be superior for control of tikka disease (PDI 16.98%) amongst the treatments followed by Eucalyptus sp. (PDI 21.02%) and Truchoderma viride (culture filtrate 5%) (PDI 22.93%). The PDI of control was found to be maximum as 37.63 Per cent. Also an increased pod yield (1.4 kg per plot) was found with leaf kernel extract of Azadirachta indica

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel extract (5%) of Azadirachta indica was superior for control of tikka disease in groundnut (PDI 16.98%) among the treatments.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
kernel extract (5% conc.) of Azadirachta indicae1
Outcome
control of tikka diseasee3
Direction
superiore1
Value
PDI 16.98%e1
Comparator
the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“The kernel extract (5% conc.) of Azadirachta indica was found to be superior for control of tikka disease (PDI 16.98%) amongst the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–412 · show in text ↑
e3

“control of tikka disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extract of Eucalyptus sp. gave lower tikka disease PDI (21.02%) than the other treatments.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Eucalyptus sp.e2
Outcome
control of tikka diseasee3
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
PDI 21.02%e2
Comparator
the treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“amongst the treatments followed by Eucalyptus sp. (PDI 21.02%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“control of tikka disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture filtrate (5%) of Truchoderma viride gave lower tikka disease PDI (22.93%) than the other treatments.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
culture filtrate 5%e4
Interactor
Truchoderma viridee4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of tikka diseasee3
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
PDI 22.93%e4
Comparator
amongst the treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“control of tikka disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–376 · show in text ↑
e4

“Truchoderma viride (culture filtrate 5%) (PDI 22.93%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–510 · show in text ↑
e5

“amongst the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control treatment had the maximum tikka disease PDI of 37.63 percent in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
PDI of controle5
Direction
maximume5
Value
37.63 Per cente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“The PDI of control was found to be maximum as 37.63 Per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf kernel extract of Azadirachta indica increased groundnut pod yield (1.4 kg per plot).

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
leaf kernel extract of Azadirachta indicae6
Outcome
pod yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
1.4 kg per plote6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e6

“Also an increased pod yield (1.4 kg per plot) was found with leaf kernel extract of Azadirachta indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extracts of botanicals and culture filtrates of bioagents were effective for controlling tikka disease in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
leaf extracts of differents botanicals and boigagentse7
Outcome
control of tikka diseasee3
Direction
effectivee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of tikka diasease of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“control of tikka disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–376 · show in text ↑
e7

“The use of leaf extracts of differents botanicals and boigagents was found to be effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–269 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 61 positive, 1 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

pathogen product · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.