Paper · 2025 · Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Cell-free supernatants from plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus albus strains control Aspergillus flavus disease in peanut and maize seedlings

Lai Loi Trinh; Kim Ngoc Le; Hoang Anh Le Lam; et al.

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Aspergillus flavus , a seed-borne fungal pathogen, colonizes host plants and exploits nutrients, hindering the growth of seedlings such as peanut and maize. This study investigates the effectiveness of cell-free supernatants (CFSs) from the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Bacillus albus strains NNK24 and NDP61, which belong to the Bacillus cereus group, in suppressing A. flavus AF1. Results The antifungal activity of these CFSs was attributed to their surfactant properties and chemical composition. These were characterized using rapid chemical assays and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-quadrupole time-of-flight/mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF/MS), combined with bioinformatic tools such as Global Natural Product Social Molecular Networking (GNPS) and Natural Products Atlas (NPAtlas). Identified putative antifungal compounds included two diketopiperazines (cyclo(Pro-Leu) and cyclo(2-hydroxy-Pro-Leu)), four macrolactins (7-O-succinyl macrolactin A, 7-O-methyl-5′-hydroxy-3′-heptenoate-macrolactin, macrolactin B, and macrolactin C), two siderophores (petrobactin and bacillibactin), and three cyclic lipopeptides (kurstakin 1, 2 or 3, and 4). These compounds are hypothesized to act synergistically via multiple mechanisms, including disruption of fungal membranes, iron capture, direct antibiosis, and triggering plant immunity. Both CFSs strongly suppressed the harmful effects of A. flavus AF1 and seed-borne A. flavus on peanut and maize seedlings, reducing disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI) compared to controls. The disease control efficacy (DCE) of the CFSs was comparable to that of the commercial fungicide. Additionally, the CFSs enhanced seed germination, vigor, seedling length, and weight in both peanut and maize. Vigor index (VI) values increased by 222.4–286.0% in peanuts and 181.7–216.4% in maize at 7 days after treatment (DAT). Conclusion CFSs of B. albus NNK24 and NDP61 show significant potential as bioprotective agents for sustainable agriculture. Importantly, their use eliminates the need for live bacterial cells from the B. cereus group, addressing biosafety concerns. Graphical abstract

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. albus CFSs had antifungal activity attributed to surfactant properties and chemical composition.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayse1
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavust0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus albusBacillus albust1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antifungal activitye0
Qualifier
surfactant properties and chemical compositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antifungal activity of these CFSs was attributed to their surfactant properties and chemical composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus albus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative antifungal diketopiperazines were identified in the supernatants.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
two diketopiperazines (cyclo(Pro-Leu) and cyclo(2-hydroxy-Pro-Leu))e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Identified putative antifungal compounds included two diketopiperazines (cyclo(Pro-Leu) and cyclo(2-hydroxy-Pro-Leu))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four putative antifungal macrolactins were identified.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
four macrolactins (7-O-succinyl macrolactin A, 7-O-methyl-5′-hydroxy-3′-heptenoate-macrolactin, macrolactin B, and macrolactin C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four macrolactins (7-O-succinyl macrolactin A, 7-O-methyl-5′-hydroxy-3′-heptenoate-macrolactin, macrolactin B, and macrolactin C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petrobactin and bacillibactin were putative antifungal siderophores.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
two siderophores (petrobactin and bacillibactin)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two siderophores (petrobactin and bacillibactin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kurstakin cyclic lipopeptides were identified as putative antifungal compounds.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
three cyclic lipopeptides (kurstakin 1, 2 or 3, and 4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three cyclic lipopeptides (kurstakin 1, 2 or 3, and 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize synergy through membrane disruption, iron capture, antibiosis and plant immunity.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
act synergisticallye0
Qualifier
disruption of fungal membranes, iron capture, direct antibiosis, and triggering plant immunitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These compounds are hypothesized to act synergistically via multiple mechanisms, including disruption of fungal membranes, iron capture, direct antibiosis, and triggering plant immunity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CFSs reduced Aspergillus disease incidence and severity in peanut seedlings.

Treatment
CFSse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus albusBacillus albust1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI)e0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CFSs strongly suppressed the harmful effects of A. flavus AF1 and seed-borne A. flavus on peanut and maize seedlings, reducing disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI) compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus albus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CFSs reduced Aspergillus disease incidence and severity in maize seedlings.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CFSse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus albusBacillus albust1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI)e0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CFSs strongly suppressed the harmful effects of A. flavus AF1 and seed-borne A. flavus on peanut and maize seedlings, reducing disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI) compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“Bacillus albus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CFS disease control efficacy was comparable to a commercial fungicide.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Treatment
CFSse0
Outcome
disease control efficacy (DCE)e0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
commercial fungicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease control efficacy (DCE) of the CFSs was comparable to that of the commercial fungicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1720 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CFSs enhanced germination, vigor, length and weight in peanut.

Treatment
CFSse0
Outcome
seed germination, vigor, seedling length, and weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CFSs enhanced seed germination, vigor, seedling length, and weight in both peanut and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1831 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CFSs enhanced germination, vigor, length and weight in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CFSse0
Outcome
seed germination, vigor, seedling length, and weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CFSs enhanced seed germination, vigor, seedling length, and weight in both peanut and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1831 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut vigor index increased 222.4–286.0% seven days after CFS treatment.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
treatment (DAT)e0
Outcome
Vigor index (VI) valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
222.4–286.0%e0
Qualifier
7 days after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vigor index (VI) values increased by 222.4–286.0% in peanuts and 181.7–216.4% in maize at 7 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize vigor index increased 181.7–216.4% seven days after CFS treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CFSse1
Outcome
Vigor index (VI) valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
181.7–216.4%e0
Qualifier
7 days after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vigor index (VI) values increased by 222.4–286.0% in peanuts and 181.7–216.4% in maize at 7 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1951 · show in text ↑
e1

“CFSs of B. albus NNK24 and NDP61”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–1995 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest CFSs as bioprotective agents without live B. cereus-group cells.

Taxon
peanut and maizeArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Outcome
bioprotective agents for sustainable agriculturee0
Qualifier
eliminates the need for live bacterial cells from the B. cereus groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CFSs of B. albus NNK24 and NDP61 show significant potential as bioprotective agents for sustainable agriculture. Importantly, their use eliminates the need for live bacterial cells from the B. cereus group, addressing biosafety concerns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2200 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut and maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–152 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · Aspergillus flavus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pathogen product · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pathogen product · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

pathogen product · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pathogen product · Aspergillus flavus · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pathogen product · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.