Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Fruit Maturity and 1-Methylcyclopropene Influence Quality Retention and Chlorophyll Degradation in ‘Golden Ball’ Apples During Cold Storage

Nay Myo Win; Jong-Taek Park; Jeong-Hee Kim; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fruit quality and skin color are key determinants of apple marketability. This study investigated the effect of fruit maturity and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment on quality attributes and chlorophyll (Chl) degradation in ‘Golden Ball’ apples during long-term cold storage. Apples were harvested at two maturity stages—low maturity (LM, starch pattern index [SPI] 6) and high maturity (HM, SPI 8)—based on Cornell’s SPI method, and subsequently treated with 1-MCP (LM+1-MCP and HM+1-MCP) before storage. At harvest, HM fruits exhibited significantly higher soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), red coloration (a*), index of absorbance difference (IAD), and respiration rate compared to LM fruits, although ethylene production, internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and firmness were not affected by maturity stage. During storage, HM fruits showed a more rapid decline in firmness, SSC, and TA, along with increased IEC, respiration rate, and a* value, and reduced IAD and Chl contents. Consistently, expression levels of genes associated with ethylene biosynthesis and Chl degradation were also higher in HM fruits. However, application of 1-MCP effectively suppressed ethylene production and respiration, thereby slowing the deterioration of fruit quality and Chl degradation in both maturity groups. Notably, the LM+1-MCP group demonstrated stronger ethylene inhibition and retained higher Chl levels than the HM+1-MCP group. Overall, the findings demonstrate that applying 1-MCP at the LM stage is a superior strategy for maintaining the postharvest quality of the apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, high-maturity apples had higher SSC, TA and red coloration than low-maturity fruit.

Material
HM fruitse0
Outcome
soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), red coloration (a*)e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HM fruits exhibited significantly higher soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), red coloration (a*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, high-maturity apples had higher IAD and respiration rate.

Material
HM fruitse0
Outcome
index of absorbance difference (IAD), and respiration ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
LM fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HM fruits exhibited significantly higher soluble solid content (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), red coloration (a*), index of absorbance difference (IAD), and respiration rate compared to LM fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maturity did not affect ethylene production, IEC or firmness at harvest.

Treatment
maturity stagee0
Outcome
ethylene production, internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and firmnesse0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene production, internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and firmness were not affected by maturity stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During storage, high-maturity fruit lost firmness, SSC and TA more rapidly.

Material
HM fruitse0
Outcome
firmness, SSC, and TAe0
Direction
more rapid declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HM fruits showed a more rapid decline in firmness, SSC, and TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During storage, high-maturity fruit increased IEC, respiration and red color.

Outcome
IEC, respiration rate, and a* valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased IEC, respiration rate, and a* value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During storage, high-maturity fruit had reduced IAD and chlorophyll.

Outcome
IAD and Chl contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced IAD and Chl contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene biosynthesis and chlorophyll degradation gene expression was higher in high-maturity fruit.

Material
HM fruitse0
Gene
genes associated with ethylene biosynthesis and Chl degradatione0
Outcome
expression levelse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression levels of genes associated with ethylene biosynthesis and Chl degradation were also higher in HM fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP suppressed ethylene production and respiration in both maturity groups.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene production and respiratione0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 1-MCP effectively suppressed ethylene production and respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP slowed deterioration of quality and chlorophyll degradation in both maturity groups.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
deterioration of fruit quality and Chl degradatione0
Direction
slowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 1-MCP effectively suppressed ethylene production and respiration, thereby slowing the deterioration of fruit quality and Chl degradation in both maturity groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-maturity fruit given 1-MCP had stronger ethylene inhibition than high-maturity fruit given 1-MCP.

Treatment
LM+1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene inhibitione0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
HM+1-MCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM+1-MCP group demonstrated stronger ethylene inhibition and retained higher Chl levels than the HM+1-MCP group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-maturity fruit given 1-MCP retained more chlorophyll than high-maturity fruit given 1-MCP.

Treatment
LM+1-MCPe0
Outcome
Chl levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
HM+1-MCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LM+1-MCP group demonstrated stronger ethylene inhibition and retained higher Chl levels than the HM+1-MCP group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying 1-MCP at the low-maturity stage for postharvest quality.

Outcome
applying 1-MCP at the LM stagee0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 1-MCP at the LM stage is a superior strategy for maintaining the postharvest quality of the apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1600 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: grain · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.