Paper · 2004 · HortScience

The Influence of 1-Methylcyclopropene on `Cortland' and `McIntosh' Apple Quality Following Long-term Storage

John M. DeLong; Robert K. Prange; Peter A. Harrison

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

`Redcort Cortland' and `Redmax' and `Summerland McIntosh' apples (Malus × domestica Borkh.) were treated with 900 nL·L -1 of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) for 24 hours at 20 °C before storage and were kept at 3 °C in either a controlled atmosphere (CA) of 2 kPa O 2 and <2.5 kPa CO 2 or in an air (RA) environment for up to 9 months. After 4.5 months, half of the fruit were treated with a second 900 nL·L -1 1-MCP application in air at 3 °C for 24 hours and then returned to RA or CA storage. At harvest and following removal at 3, 6, and 9 months and a 7-day shelf life at 20 °C, fruit firmness, titratable acidity (TA) and soluble solids content (SSC) were measured, while internal ethylene concentrations (IEC) in the apple core were quantified after 1 day at 20 °C. Upon storage removal and following a 21-day shelf life at 20 °C, disorder incidence was evaluated. 1-MCP-treated apples, particularly those held in CA-storage, were more firm and had lower IEC than untreated fruit. Higher TA levels were maintained with 1-MCP in all three strains from both storages, while SSC was not affected. Following the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP suppressed superficial scald development in all strains and reduced core browning and senescent breakdown in RA-stored `Redmax' and `Summerland' and senescent breakdown in RA-stored `Redcort'. 1-MCP generally maintained the quality of `Cortland' and `McIntosh' fruit held in CA and RA environments (particularly the former) to a higher degree than untreated apples over the 9-month storage period. A second midstorage application of 1-MCP at 3 °C did not improve poststorage fruit quality above a single, prestorage treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples treated with 1-MCP, particularly those held in CA storage, were firmer than untreated fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
firme0
Direction
more firme0
Qualifier
particularly those held in CA-storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP-treated apples, particularly those held in CA-storage, were more firm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples treated with 1-MCP, particularly those held in CA storage, had lower internal ethylene concentration (IEC) than untreated fruit.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
IECe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
particularly those held in CA-storagee0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP-treated apples, particularly those held in CA-storage, were more firm and had lower IEC than untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher titratable acidity was maintained with 1-MCP in all three strains from both storages.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
TA levelse0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
all three strains from both storagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher TA levels were maintained with 1-MCP in all three strains from both storages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids content was not affected by 1-MCP.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher TA levels were maintained with 1-MCP in all three strains from both storages, while SSC was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP suppressed superficial scald development in all strains.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
superficial scald developmente0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
all strainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Following the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP suppressed superficial scald development in all strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP reduced core browning and senescent breakdown in RA-stored Redmax apples.

Material
Redmaxe0
Outcome
core browning and senescent breakdowne0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
RA-storede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced core browning and senescent breakdown in RA-stored `Redmax' and `Summerland'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP reduced core browning and senescent breakdown in RA-stored Summerland apples.

Material
Summerlande0
Outcome
core browning and senescent breakdowne0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
RA-storede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced core browning and senescent breakdown in RA-stored `Redmax' and `Summerland'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the 6- and/or 9-month removals, 1-MCP reduced senescent breakdown in RA-stored Redcort apples.

Material
Redcorte0
Outcome
senescent breakdowne0
Qualifier
RA-storede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“senescent breakdown in RA-stored `Redcort'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over the 9-month storage period 1-MCP generally maintained the quality of Cortland and McIntosh fruit in CA and RA storage, particularly CA, to a higher degree than untreated apples.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
higher degreee0
Comparator
untreated applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP generally maintained the quality of `Cortland' and `McIntosh' fruit held in CA and RA environments (particularly the former) to a higher degree than untreated apples over the 9-month storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second midstorage application of 1-MCP at 3 C did not improve poststorage fruit quality beyond a single prestorage treatment.

Treatment
second midstorage application of 1-MCP at 3 °Ce0
Outcome
poststorage fruit qualitye0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
single, prestorage treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“A second midstorage application of 1-MCP at 3 °C did not improve poststorage fruit quality above a single, prestorage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1671 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: grain · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.