Paper · 2025 · Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews

Effect of weed control treatments on weeds and physiology of Bt cotton grown under North Gujarat agroclimatic conditions of India

Presha Mukeshkumar Parmar; Vikash Kumar; Jugal Kishor Malav; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Weeds are major obstacles in the successful cultivation of cotton. Many weeds have fast growth; hence they offer severe competition with crops especially in the initial stage. Manual weeding is time-consuming, expensive and tedious. A judicious combination of chemical and cultural methods of weed control seems necessary for effective control of weeds and for the best possible utilization of costly inputs which would ultimately result in higher yields. Therefore, a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Gujarat (India) during kharif 2022 to study the “Effect of weed control treatments on weeds and physiology of Bt cotton grown under North Gujarat agroclimatic conditions of India” on loamy sand soil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with three replications and ten treatments. The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually at a row-to-row distance of 120 cm and 45 cm between plant to plant. Different weed control treatments significantly affected the dry weight of total weeds across the crop growth stages. After weed free plot, the minimum dry weight of total weeds at 25 and 50 DAS was observed under pendimethalin 1000 g/ha as PE + pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS (T 5 ). After weed free plot, the dry weight of total weeds at 75 DAS was found minimum under pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DAS (T 8 ), which had significantly reduced the dry weight of total weeds compared to all other treatments except weed free plot. The maximum dry weight of total weeds at 25, 50, and 75 DAS was observed under a weedy check plot and was significantly higher than all other weed control treatments. Physiological parameters of the crop viz., leaf area index, leaf area duration, chlorophyll content index, and PS Ⅱ quantum were reported maximum under weed-free plot followed by pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/haas PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DAS. The seed cotton yield was reported significantly higher under weed free plot over all other weed control treatments except T 8 which was adjudged at par with weed- free plot. Based on the results of the experiment, it is concluded that T 8 controlled weeds effectively in Bt cotton and gave higher seed cotton yield and net return under North Gujarat conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different weed control treatments significantly affected the dry weight of total weeds across the crop growth stages in Bt cotton.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
weed control treatmentse2
Interactor
total weedse2weed
Outcome
dry weight of total weedse2
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e2

“Different weed control treatments significantly affected the dry weight of total weeds across the crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrithiobac sodium plus quizalofop ethyl PoE at 25 DAS with IC fb HW at 50 DAS (T8) gave the minimum total weed dry weight at 75 DAS, significantly lower than all other treatments except the weed-free plot.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DASe4
Interactor
total weedse4weed
Outcome
dry weight of total weeds at 75 DASe4
Direction
minimume4
Comparator
all other treatments except weed free plote5
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e4

“the dry weight of total weeds at 75 DAS was found minimum under pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DAS (T 8 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1591 · show in text ↑
e5

“which had significantly reduced the dry weight of total weeds compared to all other treatments except weed free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check plot had the maximum total weed dry weight at 25, 50 and 75 DAS, significantly higher than all other weed control treatments.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
weedy check plote6
Interactor
total weedse6weed
Outcome
dry weight of total weeds at 25, 50, and 75 DASe6
Direction
maximume6
Comparator
all other weed control treatmentse6
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum dry weight of total weeds at 25, 50, and 75 DAS was observed under a weedy check plot and was significantly higher than all other weed control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free plot gave the maximum leaf area index, leaf area duration and chlorophyll content index of the crop.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
weed-free plote7
Outcome
leaf area index, leaf area duration, chlorophyll content indexe7
Direction
maximume7
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e7

“Physiological parameters of the crop viz., leaf area index, leaf area duration, chlorophyll content index, and PS Ⅱ quantum were reported maximum under weed-free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free plot gave the maximum PS II quantum of the crop.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
weed-free plote7
Outcome
PS Ⅱ quantume7
Direction
maximume7
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e7

“Physiological parameters of the crop viz., leaf area index, leaf area duration, chlorophyll content index, and PS Ⅱ quantum were reported maximum under weed-free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–2044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed cotton yield under the weed-free plot was significantly higher than under all other weed control treatments except T8.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
weed free plote2
Outcome
seed cotton yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
all other weed control treatments except T 8e2
Setting
Agronomy Instructional Farme0

Verbatim

e0

“a field experiment was planned and conducted at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seed cotton yield was reported significantly higher under weed free plot over all other weed control treatments except T 8 which was adjudged at par with weed- free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave seed cotton yield at par with the weed-free plot.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Material
GTHH 49e1
Treatment
pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DASe4
Outcome
seed cotton yielde5
Direction
at pare6
Comparator
weed- free plote6

Verbatim

e1

“The Bt cotton variety GTHH 49 was sown manually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1006 · show in text ↑
e4

“the dry weight of total weeds at 75 DAS was found minimum under pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop ethyl 100 (60 + 40) g/ha as PoE at 25 DAS + IC fb HW at 50 DAS (T 8 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1591 · show in text ↑
e5

“The seed cotton yield was reported significantly higher under weed free plot over all other weed control treatments except T 8 which was adjudged at par with weed- free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2325 · show in text ↑
e6

“which was adjudged at par with weed- free plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 controlled weeds effectively in Bt cotton and gave higher seed cotton yield and net return under North Gujarat conditions.

Taxon
Bt cottone2
Treatment
T 8e2
Outcome
seed cotton yield and net returne2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“T 8 controlled weeds effectively in Bt cotton and gave higher seed cotton yield and net return under North Gujarat conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2388–2513 · show in text ↑

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.