Paper · 1977 · Weed Science

Effect of Height of Directed Applications of Herbicides in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

K.C. Hamilton; H.F. Arle

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea], and prometryn [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)- s -triazine] were applied postemergence in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) 50 cm high as directed sprays covering (a) the furrow and base of cotton plants or (b) covering the lower half of cotton plants. Herbicides directed to the base of plants caused little or no chlorosis of cotton foliage. When applied to the lower half of cotton plants, linuron caused the most injury to foliage; diuron, the least symptoms. Herbicides directed to base or lower half of cotton plants did not significantly reduce yields, alter boll components or fiber properties, and controlled broadleaved weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides directed to the base caused little or no cotton leaf chlorosis.

Treatment
Herbicides directed to the base of plantse0
Outcome
chlorosis of cotton foliagee0
Direction
little or noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides directed to the base of plants caused little or no chlorosis of cotton foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron applied to the lower half caused the most foliage injury.

Treatment
linurone0
Outcome
injury to foliagee0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
diurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied to the lower half of cotton plants, linuron caused the most injury to foliage; diuron, the least symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diuron applied to the lower half caused the least foliage symptoms.

Treatment
diurone0
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
linurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied to the lower half of cotton plants, linuron caused the most injury to foliage; diuron, the least symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed herbicides did not significantly reduce cotton yields.

Treatment
Herbicides directed to base or lower halfe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides directed to base or lower half of cotton plants did not significantly reduce yields, alter boll components or fiber properties, and controlled broadleaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed herbicides did not alter cotton boll components or fiber properties.

Treatment
Herbicides directed to base or lower halfe0
Outcome
boll components or fiber propertiese0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides directed to base or lower half of cotton plants did not significantly reduce yields, alter boll components or fiber properties, and controlled broadleaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Directed herbicides controlled broadleaved weeds.

Treatment
Herbicides directed to base or lower halfe0
Outcome
broadleaved weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides directed to base or lower half of cotton plants did not significantly reduce yields, alter boll components or fiber properties, and controlled broadleaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–749 · show in text ↑

linuron · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 10 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Fluometuron PRE increased cotton lint yield.

    Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton · 2002 · compared with systems that did not use fluometuron PRE

    Opposite direction

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.