Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Impact of High Density Planting and Weed Management Practices on Yield Attributes, Yield and Quality Characters of Bt Cotton

B. Madavi; P. Leela Rani; G. Sreenivas; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Vigilant production and economic strategies are important for cotton growing farmers to sustain the productivity due to expanding cost of cultivation and stagnating yields A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2015 to evaluate with four planting densities 55,555 plants ha-1, 1,11,111 plants ha-1, normal planting, and paired row planting, 1,48,148 plants ha-1 and 4 weed management practices (pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60, DAS, early PoE application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 15 DAS fb glyphosate ammomium salt 2.13 kg ha-1 at 45 DAS, PE application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb HW at 20 and 45 DAS and unweeded control. Plant density of 1,11,111 plants ha-1 (60 cm x 15 cm) produced significantly more kapas yield (3134 kg ha-1), Among the weed management practices, pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb PoE tank mix application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60 DAS recorded more kapas yield (3119 kg ha-1) and ginning % and was comparable with two other weed management practices. Plant densities did not influence lint index, ginning % and seed index.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density of 1,11,111 plants per hectare produced significantly more kapas yield of 3134 kg per hectare.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
1,11,111 plants ha-1e0
Outcome
kapas yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
3134 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density of 1,11,111 plants ha-1 (60 cm x 15 cm) produced significantly more kapas yield (3134 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified pendimethalin followed by herbicide mix treatment recorded more kapas yield of 3119 kg per hectare.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb PoE tank mix application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60 DASe0
Outcome
kapas yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
3119 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb PoE tank mix application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60 DAS recorded more kapas yield (3119 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same weed management treatment recorded more ginning percentage.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb PoE tank mix application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60 DASe0
Outcome
ginning %e0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pre emergence application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 fb PoE tank mix application of pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g ha-1+quizalofop-p-ethyl 50 g ha-1 at 20, 40, 60 DAS recorded more kapas yield (3119 kg ha-1) and ginning %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant densities did not influence lint index, ginning percentage or seed index.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
Plant densitiese0
Outcome
lint index, ginning % and seed indexe0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant densities did not influence lint index, ginning % and seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Lower dose fluchloralin plus hand weeding increased seed cotton yield over higher dose herbicide alone.

    INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT IN IRRIGATED HYBRID COTTON · 2008 · compared with application of these herbicides alone in higher doses

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 130 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.