Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effects of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Parameters and Yield of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Vinod Reddy; Shyamrao Kulkarni; Mohan Chavan; et al.

4
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: To know the effect of integrated weed management on weed parameters and yield of bt cotton. Study Design: Randomized complete block design. Place and Duration of Study: College of Agriculture Farm, Bheemaraynagudi between July 2021 and Feb 2022. Methodology: The field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2021 at Experimental block, College of Agriculture, Bheemarayanagudi. The soil of the experiment field was deep black clayey in texture. The experiment comprises 11 weed management practices viz., T1: Pendimethalin 38.7% CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE + Hand weeding @ 20-25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T2: Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 75g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 37.5g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS. (Tank mix), T3 : Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 50g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 25 g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T4 :Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 75g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 37.5g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T5 : Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 100g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T6 : Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 50g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 25g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T7: Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 75g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 37.5g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T8: Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 100g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS, T9: Farmers practice (Hand weeding @ 25 DAS and 2 intercultivations @ 50 and 75 DAS), T10: Weedy check, T11: Weed free check. Results: Among the treatments, application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density and higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %), also recorded higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments. Conclusion: Application of Pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb Pyrithiobac Sodium 10 EC @ 100g a.i./ha + Quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50g a.i./ha as PoE @ 25 DAS and Intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS was found effective in controlling the weeds with coupled with higher seed cotton yield .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment significantly reduced weed density.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DASe1
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Verbatim

e0

“recorded significantly lower weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density and higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %), also recorded higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2318 · show in text ↑
e2

“other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2301–2317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher weed control efficiency of 82.39%.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DASe1
Interactor
weede0weedt0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
82.39 %e0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density and higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %), also recorded higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2318 · show in text ↑
e2

“other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2301–2317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher seed cotton yield of 2495 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DASe1
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2495 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Verbatim

e0

“higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density and higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %), also recorded higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2318 · show in text ↑
e2

“other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2301–2317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher stalk yield of 4056 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DASe1
Outcome
stalk yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
4056 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2269–2317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of pendimethalin 38.7 % CS @ 750 g a.i./ha as PE fb pyrithiobac sodium 10 EC @ 100 g a.i./ha + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC @ 50 g a.i./ha as PoE (combi-product) @ 25 DAS and intercultivation @ 55-60 DAS recorded significantly lower weed density and higher weed control efficiency (82.39 %), also recorded higher seed cotton yield (2495 kg ha-1) and stalk yield (4056 kg ha-1) over other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2318 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.