Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

A Combined Strategy Using Funneliformis mosseae and Phosphorus Addition for Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance

Bin Zhang; Xueqin Li; Jieyu Bao; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play a crucial role in the soil–plant interface, yet the combined effects of AMF inoculation and phosphorus (P) addition on soil–plant nitrogen (N) and P, as well as oat grain yield, under drought stress remain unclear. Experiments were conducted during the 2021 and 2022 oat-growing seasons, applying AMF (40 g inoculum per pot; sterilized inoculum as the NAMF control) and P (0, 20, and 40 mg kg−1 soil, designated P0, P1, and P2) under 75% and 55% relative water content. This study found that AMF inoculation at the P1 level significantly improved the AMF colonization rate, grain yield, and partial factor productivity of P (PFPP) of oat. The grain yield increased by 6.2% (2021) and 9.8% (2022) under drought stress compared to the AMF-free treatment. AMF inoculation and P addition showed interactive effects on soil–plant N and P dynamics, which significantly increased microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), nitrate N, and the available P content in oat soil. P1AMF significantly increased the total N and P contents under drought stress compared to P1NAMF, with maximum increments of 40.7% (N) and 11.1% (P) in 2021 and 15.4% (N) and 32.3% (P) in 2022. Moreover, the P1AMF treatment significantly improved P recovery efficiency (PRE), achieving a maximum increase of 48.4% across the two-year study. The analysis revealed that soil MBP was the key factor influencing oat grain yield, as well as the total N and P content in oat plants. It was concluded that AMF inoculation with a moderate amount of P addition could effectively regulate soil N and P availability and enhance plant N and P contents, as well as P productivity and use efficiency, thereby improving oat drought tolerance. Soil MBP acted as a vital bridge in the oat soil–plant continuum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation at the P1 level improved AMF colonization rate, grain yield and partial factor productivity of P in oat compared with the NAMF control.

Treatment
AMF inoculation at the P1 levele1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
AMF colonization rate, grain yield, and partial factor productivity of P (PFPP)e1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
NAMF controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“AMF inoculation at the P1 level significantly improved the AMF colonization rate, grain yield, and partial factor productivity of P (PFPP) of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–677 · show in text ↑
e2

“sterilized inoculum as the NAMF control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, oat grain yield increased by 6.2% in 2021 compared with the AMF-free treatment.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
6.2%e3
Qualifier
(2021)e3
Comparator
AMF-free treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The grain yield increased by 6.2% (2021) and 9.8% (2022) under drought stress compared to the AMF-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation at the P1 level significantly improved the AMF colonization rate, grain yield, and partial factor productivity of P (PFPP) of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, oat grain yield increased by 9.8% in 2022 compared with the AMF-free treatment.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
9.8%e3
Qualifier
(2022)e3
Comparator
AMF-free treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The grain yield increased by 6.2% (2021) and 9.8% (2022) under drought stress compared to the AMF-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation at the P1 level significantly improved the AMF colonization rate, grain yield, and partial factor productivity of P (PFPP) of oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation and P addition increased soil microbial biomass phosphorus, nitrate N and available P in the oat soil.

Treatment
AMF inoculation and P additione4
Interactor
AMFe4symbiont
Outcome
microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), nitrate N, and the available P contente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“AMF inoculation and P addition showed interactive effects on soil–plant N and P dynamics, which significantly increased microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), nitrate N, and the available P content in oat soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, P1AMF increased total N in oat in 2021 by 40.7% relative to P1NAMF.

Treatment
P1AMFe5
Outcome
total N and P contentse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
40.7% (N)e5
Qualifier
in 2021e5
Comparator
P1NAMFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“P1AMF significantly increased the total N and P contents under drought stress compared to P1NAMF, with maximum increments of 40.7% (N) and 11.1% (P) in 2021 and 15.4% (N) and 32.3% (P) in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, P1AMF increased total P in oat in 2021 by 11.1% relative to P1NAMF.

Treatment
P1AMFe5
Outcome
total N and P contentse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
11.1% (P)e5
Qualifier
in 2021e5
Comparator
P1NAMFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“P1AMF significantly increased the total N and P contents under drought stress compared to P1NAMF, with maximum increments of 40.7% (N) and 11.1% (P) in 2021 and 15.4% (N) and 32.3% (P) in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, P1AMF increased total N in oat in 2022 by 15.4% relative to P1NAMF.

Treatment
P1AMFe5
Outcome
total N and P contentse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
15.4% (N)e5
Qualifier
in 2022e5
Comparator
P1NAMFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“P1AMF significantly increased the total N and P contents under drought stress compared to P1NAMF, with maximum increments of 40.7% (N) and 11.1% (P) in 2021 and 15.4% (N) and 32.3% (P) in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, P1AMF increased total P in oat in 2022 by 32.3% relative to P1NAMF.

Treatment
P1AMFe5
Outcome
total N and P contentse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
32.3% (P)e5
Qualifier
in 2022e5
Comparator
P1NAMFe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“P1AMF significantly increased the total N and P contents under drought stress compared to P1NAMF, with maximum increments of 40.7% (N) and 11.1% (P) in 2021 and 15.4% (N) and 32.3% (P) in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P1AMF improved P recovery efficiency in oat by a maximum of 48.4% across the two-year study.

Treatment
P1AMF treatmente6
Outcome
P recovery efficiency (PRE)e6
Direction
improvede6
Value
48.4%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Moreover, the P1AMF treatment significantly improved P recovery efficiency (PRE), achieving a maximum increase of 48.4% across the two-year study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass phosphorus was the key factor influencing oat grain yield.

Compound
soil MBPe7
Outcome
oat grain yielde7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The analysis revealed that soil MBP was the key factor influencing oat grain yield, as well as the total N and P content in oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass phosphorus was the key factor influencing total N and P content in oat plants.

Compound
soil MBPe7
Outcome
total N and P contente7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The analysis revealed that soil MBP was the key factor influencing oat grain yield, as well as the total N and P content in oat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Enhancing Oat Drought Tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–107 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: biology · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.