Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Collar rot of chickpea: In vivo evaluation of fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments for disease management

PC Chovatiya; SV Undhad; MH Dabhi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One of the major pulse crops cultivated in temperate, sub-tropical and tropical climates worldwide is the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Chickpea is known to affect by many fungal, bacterial and viral diseases. Among them, chickpea collar rot occurs in moderate to severe form in Gujarat state. Looking to the symptomatology, affected seedlings turn yellow, upon uprooting seedlings show rotting at the collar region which covered with whitish mycelial strands. A white mycelial coating can be seen on the tap root of completely dried seedlings and produced mustard grain sized light to dark brown structures known as sclerotia. Evaluation of different fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments against Sclerotium rolfsii under field condition and showed that all the treatments were effective as compare to control. Carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS showed minimum disease incidence (6.22%) with maximum disease reduction over control (75.00%) whereas, neem cake treatment recorded maximum per cent disease incidence of (20.85%) with minimum disease reduction over control (16.67%). The corresponding maximum seed yield (1360 kg/ha) was observed in carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS with per cent seed yield increase over control of 19.77 per cent whereas, control treatment exhibited minimum seed yield (1091 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All evaluated treatments controlled Sclerotium rolfsii more effectively than control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluation of different fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments against Sclerotium rolfsii under field condition and showed that all the treatments were effective as compare to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea: In vivo evaluation of fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments for disease management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxin plus thiram gave the lowest disease incidence, 6.22%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WSe0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS showed minimum disease incidence (6.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxin plus thiram gave 75.00% disease reduction over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WSe0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
75.00%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS showed minimum disease incidence (6.22%) with maximum disease reduction over control (75.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake had the highest disease incidence, 20.85%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
neem cake treatmente0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
20.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem cake treatment recorded maximum per cent disease incidence of (20.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake had the smallest disease reduction over control, 16.67%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
neem cake treatmente0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
16.67%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem cake treatment recorded maximum per cent disease incidence of (20.85%) with minimum disease reduction over control (16.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxin plus thiram gave maximum seed yield of 1360 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WSe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1360 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum seed yield (1360 kg/ha) was observed in carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxin plus thiram increased seed yield over control by 19.77 per cent.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WSe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19.77 per cente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (1360 kg/ha) was observed in carboxin 37.5 + thiram 37.5 WS with per cent seed yield increase over control of 19.77 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had minimum seed yield of 1091 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1091 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control treatment exhibited minimum seed yield (1091 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–22 · show in text ↑

carboxin · control · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carboxin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carboxin · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

thiram · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiram · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · control · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.