Paper · 2015 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Exploiting novel rhizosphere Bacillus species to suppress the root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea

Padinhare Smitha Kodoth; Mohan Rajeswari; Devadason Alice; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Thirty isolates of Bacillus were collected from chickpea rhizosphere and screened for their in vitro inhibition against root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola) and wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri) pathogens and growth promotion of chickpea. Based on the in vitro inhibition and growth promotion tests, the best eight isolates were selected and PCR-based detection of antibiotics genes viz., surfactin, iturin, fengycin and bacillomycin D was carried out. The isolate which produced all these antibiotics and showed maximum in vitro inhibition (CaB 5) was further used for crude antibiotics extraction and inhibition assays. The presence of antibiotics in crude extract was detected through TLC. The inhibitory effect of the crude extract was proved through agar-well diffusion assay and spore germination inhibition test. From this study, it was inferred that the Bacillus subtilis strain CaB5 was promising in inhibiting the root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea and enhance seedling vigour. Key words: Biological control, plant growth promotion, surfactin, iturin, fengycin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus isolate CaB 5 showed the maximum in vitro inhibition of root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea among the tested isolates.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CaB 5e1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
CaB 5e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
in vitro inhibitione1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cicerie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty isolates of Bacillus were collected from chickpea rhizosphere and screened for their in vitro inhibition against root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola) and wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri) pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–206 · show in text ↑
e1

“The isolate which produced all these antibiotics and showed maximum in vitro inhibition (CaB 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus isolate CaB 5 was reported to produce all four antibiotics (surfactin, iturin, fengycin, bacillomycin D), with the genes detected by PCR.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
CaB 5e1
Outcome
antibiotics genese2
Qualifier
surfactin, iturin, fengycin and bacillomycin De2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty isolates of Bacillus were collected from chickpea rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“The isolate which produced all these antibiotics and showed maximum in vitro inhibition (CaB 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–550 · show in text ↑
e2

“PCR-based detection of antibiotics genes viz., surfactin, iturin, fengycin and bacillomycin D was carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of antibiotics was detected in the crude extract of the chickpea Bacillus isolate by TLC.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
presence of antibiotics in crude extracte3
Qualifier
through TLCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty isolates of Bacillus were collected from chickpea rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“The presence of antibiotics in crude extract was detected through TLC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crude extract of the isolate had an inhibitory effect on spore germination in an agar-well diffusion assay and a spore germination inhibition test.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
crude extracte4
Outcome
spore germinatione4
Direction
inhibitorye4
Qualifier
agar-well diffusion assaye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty isolates of Bacillus were collected from chickpea rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“The inhibitory effect of the crude extract was proved through agar-well diffusion assay and spore germination inhibition test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis strain CaB5 was judged promising for inhibiting root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea and for enhancing seedling vigour (author inference).

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume5
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis strain CaB5e5
Outcome
seedling vigoure5
Direction
enhancee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the Bacillus subtilis strain CaB5 was promising in inhibiting the root rot and wilt pathogens of chickpea and enhance seedling vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–993 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.