Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of weed management practices on yield attributes and yield of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Shambhavi .; Hansraj Shivran; OP Sharma; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2024 at the Agronomy Farm, School of Agriculture, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, to evaluate the effect of various weed management practices on yield attributes and yield of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). The study was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with eight weed management treatments replicated thrice. The treatments included manual weeding, pre-and post-emergence herbicides, and integrated approaches. Results revealed that weed management practices significantly influenced yield attributes such as number of pods per plant, seeds per pod, and test weight. The maximum number of pods per plant (51.34), seeds per pod (8.10), and test weight (34.20 g) were recorded under the weed-free treatment, closely followed by integrated treatments involving pendimethalin and imazethapyr + imazamox. Seed yield was significantly higher in one hand weeding at 20 DAS (1465 kg/ha), weed-free (1461 kg/ha), and pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamox (1448 kg/ha) compared to the weedy check (595 kg/ha). Similarly, straw and biological yields were also maximized under effective weed management regimes. Although harvest index was not significantly influenced, a relatively balanced allocation of biomass was observed across treatments. The study concludes that integrated weed management approaches are highly effective in improving the productivity of cluster bean by minimizing crop-weed competition and optimizing resource utilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free cluster bean had a maximum 51.34 pods per plant.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
weed-free treatmente0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
51.34e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum number of pods per plant (51.34), seeds per pod (8.10), and test weight (34.20 g) were recorded under the weed-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free cluster bean had a maximum 8.10 seeds per pod.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
weed-free treatmente0
Outcome
seeds per pode0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum number of pods per plant (51.34), seeds per pod (8.10), and test weight (34.20 g) were recorded under the weed-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free cluster bean had a maximum test weight of 34.20 g.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
weed-free treatmente0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
34.20 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum number of pods per plant (51.34), seeds per pod (8.10), and test weight (34.20 g) were recorded under the weed-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One hand weeding at 20 DAS produced 1465 kg/ha seed yield, significantly above the weedy check.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
one hand weeding at 20 DASe0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1465 kg/hae0
Qualifier
595 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed yield was significantly higher in one hand weeding at 20 DAS (1465 kg/ha), weed-free (1461 kg/ha), and pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamox (1448 kg/ha) compared to the weedy check (595 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free management produced 1461 kg/ha seed yield, significantly above the weedy check.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
weed-freee0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1461 kg/hae0
Qualifier
595 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed yield was significantly higher in one hand weeding at 20 DAS (1465 kg/ha), weed-free (1461 kg/ha), and pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamox (1448 kg/ha) compared to the weedy check (595 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr plus imazamox produced 1448 kg/ha seed yield, significantly above the weedy check.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamoxe0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1448 kg/hae0
Qualifier
595 kg/hae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed yield was significantly higher in one hand weeding at 20 DAS (1465 kg/ha), weed-free (1461 kg/ha), and pendimethalin fb imazethapyr + imazamox (1448 kg/ha) compared to the weedy check (595 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective weed management maximized straw and biological yields in cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
effective weed management regimese0
Outcome
straw and biological yieldse0
Direction
maximizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similarly, straw and biological yields were also maximized under effective weed management regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management did not significantly influence harvest index of cluster bean.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although harvest index was not significantly influenced, a relatively balanced allocation of biomass was observed across treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that integrated weed management improves cluster bean productivity.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
integrated weed management approachese0
Outcome
improving the productivity of cluster beane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“integrated weed management approaches are highly effective in improving the productivity of cluster bean by minimizing crop-weed competition and optimizing resource utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1528 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

imazamox · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

herbicide · quality: grain · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.