Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Mitigating Cadmium Stress in Soybean Plants: Seed Priming with Nanoscale TiO2 and ZnO for Safer Crop Production

Juntao Jia; Hanghang Yu; Dengqin Wei; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of soybean seed priming with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO 2 NPs) or zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) on germination and plant growth under cadmium (Cd) stress. Soybean seeds were primed with TiO 2 NPs (50, 100, 200, or 400 mg/L) or ZnO NPs (50, 100, 300, or 500 mg/L) followed by Cd exposure during the germination (7 days) and plant (35 days) stages. The results demonstrate that priming with 100 mg/L ZnO NPs significantly enhanced soybean germination energy by 22.5%; 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 300 mg/L ZnO NPs increased the fresh shoot and root weights by 63 and 21%, respectively, and enhanced the in-planta antioxidant capacity compared to the water-primed controls. In addition, 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs reduced Cd accumulation by 60% in stems and by 34% in leaves. Meanwhile, 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 100 mg/L ZnO NPs fixed significantly more Cd in the cell walls, thereby mitigating phytotoxicity to leaf organelles. This work demonstrates that seed priming with TiO 2 and ZnO NPs can simultaneously promote growth and alleviate the adverse effects of Cd stress on soybean and highlights the potential of this approach as a sustainable food safety strategy for crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 100 mg/L ZnO NPs enhanced soybean germination energy by 22.5%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
priming with 100 mg/L ZnO NPse0
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming with 100 mg/L ZnO NPs significantly enhanced soybean germination energy by 22.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs increased fresh shoot weight by 63%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
100 mg/L TiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
fresh shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
63e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 300 mg/L ZnO NPs increased the fresh shoot and root weights by 63 and 21%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 300 mg/L ZnO NPs increased fresh root weight by 21%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
300 mg/L ZnO NPse0
Outcome
root weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 300 mg/L ZnO NPs increased the fresh shoot and root weights by 63 and 21%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle priming enhanced antioxidant capacity relative to water priming.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 300 mg/L ZnO NPse0
Outcome
in-planta antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
water-primed controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 300 mg/L ZnO NPs increased the fresh shoot and root weights by 63 and 21%, respectively, and enhanced the in-planta antioxidant capacity compared to the water-primed controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs reduced stem Cd accumulation by 60%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
100 mg/L TiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs reduced Cd accumulation by 60% in stems and by 34% in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs reduced leaf Cd accumulation by 34%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
100 mg/L TiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs reduced Cd accumulation by 60% in stems and by 34% in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO 2 priming fixed significantly more Cd in cell walls.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
100 mg/L TiO 2 NPse0
Outcome
Cd in the cell wallse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 100 mg/L ZnO NPs fixed significantly more Cd in the cell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO priming fixed significantly more Cd in cell walls.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
100 mg/L ZnO NPse0
Outcome
Cd in the cell wallse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 mg/L TiO 2 NPs and 100 mg/L ZnO NPs fixed significantly more Cd in the cell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

titanium dioxide · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

titanium dioxide · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 74 positive, 8 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.