Paper · 2025 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Water Deficit Stress on the Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Okra Plant

Xiuhuan Meng; Zhenyu Chen; Yongyong Hui; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Water deficit stress significantly impacts the yield and quality of okra, an important edible and medicinal vegetable. Understanding the physiological adaptation mechanisms of okra under drought conditions and identifying effective adaptation strategies are critical to its sustainable development. This study examined the phenotypic traits, photosynthetic characteristics, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of okra seedlings subjected to continuous natural drought for 0, 5, 7, 15, and 20 days. The results revealed that drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings, as evidenced by reductions in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, gas exchange parameters, apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point, light saturation point, and several chlorophyll fluorescence metrics. Conversely, water deficit stress significantly enhances root development, as evidenced by increases in total root length, surface area, root tips, and root biomass. Notably, drought stress also elevates the chlorophyll a/b ratio, intercellular CO 2 concentration, dark respiration rate, and maximum net photosynthetic rate. These findings illustrated the complex physiological responses of okra to water deficit stress and highlighted a tradeoff between aboveground growth inhibition and enhanced root system development, thereby facilitating the plant’s adaptation to water deficit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought inhibited okra seedling growth.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoidse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced gas exchange parameters.

Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
gas exchange parameterse0
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gas exchange parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“reductions in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, gas exchange parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–714 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point and light saturation point.

Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point, light saturation pointe0
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point, light saturation point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“reductions in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, gas exchange parameters, apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point, light saturation point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced several chlorophyll fluorescence metrics.

Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence metricse0
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several chlorophyll fluorescence metrics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“reductions in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, gas exchange parameters, apparent quantum efficiency, light compensation point, light saturation point, and several chlorophyll fluorescence metrics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–839 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought dramatically inhibited the growth and photosynthetic processes of okra seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased total root length, surface area and root tip number.

Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
total root length, surface area, root tipse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit stress significantly enhances root development, as evidenced by increases in total root length, surface area, root tips, and root biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased root biomass.

Treatment
water deficit stresse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit stress significantly enhances root development, as evidenced by increases in total root length, surface area, root tips, and root biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought elevated chlorophyll a/b ratio, intercellular CO 2 concentration and dark respiration rate.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratio, intercellular CO 2 concentration, dark respiration ratee0
Direction
elevatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress also elevates the chlorophyll a/b ratio, intercellular CO 2 concentration, dark respiration rate, and maximum net photosynthetic rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought elevated maximum net photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
elevatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress also elevates the chlorophyll a/b ratio, intercellular CO 2 concentration, dark respiration rate, and maximum net photosynthetic rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.