Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Quantification of transpiration and evaporation of okra under subsurface drip irrigation using SIMDualKc model during vegetative development

Ashish Patil; K. N. Tiwari

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Knowledge of productive and nonproductive water loss of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] is essential during water scarcity, and for assessing links between yield and water use. The study was conducted using subsurface drip irrigation to evaluate okra transpiration and evaporation using the SIMDualKc Model. The model computed soil evaporation was 132.89 and 157.84 mm, respectively, whereas transpiration was 381.22 and 340.36 mm in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Pod yield of okra was 12.1 and 12.5 t∙ha−1; dry biomass above ground was 5.7 and 4.9 t∙ha−1 in 2016 and 2017. Biomass above ground and fresh pod yield of okra indicates that high water deficit before harvesting pods causes a depression in fresh fruit yield and decreases total pod yield. Several water deficit occurrences during the growing period lowers total transpiration and adversely impacts okra dry biomass above ground. The SIMDualKc Model is capable of quantifying evaporation, transpiration and other water balance components. It is an effective tool for assessing and predicting the impact of water deficit on plant development and yield and can be used to identify the correct irrigation strategy for maximizing crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The SIMDualKc model computed soil evaporation of okra of 132.89 and 157.84 mm.

Outcome
soil evaporatione1
Value
132.89 and 157.84 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model computed soil evaporation was 132.89 and 157.84 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The SIMDualKc model computed transpiration of okra of 381.22 and 340.36 mm in 2016 and 2017.

Outcome
transpiratione2
Value
381.22 and 340.36 mme2
Qualifier
2016 and 2017e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“transpiration was 381.22 and 340.36 mm in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield of okra was 12.1 and 12.5 t/ha.

Outcome
Pod yielde3
Value
12.1 and 12.5 t∙ha−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Pod yield of okra was 12.1 and 12.5 t∙ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–515 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry biomass above ground of okra was 5.7 and 4.9 t/ha in 2016 and 2017.

Outcome
dry biomass above grounde4
Value
5.7 and 4.9 t∙ha−1e4
Qualifier
2016 and 2017e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“dry biomass above ground was 5.7 and 4.9 t∙ha−1 in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water deficit before harvesting pods decreased fresh fruit yield of okra.

Treatment
high water deficit before harvesting podse5
Outcome
fresh fruit yielde5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“high water deficit before harvesting pods causes a depression in fresh fruit yield and decreases total pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water deficit before harvesting pods decreased total pod yield of okra.

Treatment
high water deficit before harvesting podse5
Outcome
total pod yielde5
Direction
decreasese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“high water deficit before harvesting pods causes a depression in fresh fruit yield and decreases total pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several water deficit occurrences during the growing period lowered total transpiration of okra.

Treatment
Several water deficit occurrences during the growing periode6
Outcome
total transpiratione6
Direction
lowerse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“Several water deficit occurrences during the growing period lowers total transpiration and adversely impacts okra dry biomass above ground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several water deficit occurrences during the growing period decreased dry biomass above ground of okra.

Treatment
Several water deficit occurrences during the growing periode6
Outcome
dry biomass above grounde6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“Several water deficit occurrences during the growing period lowers total transpiration and adversely impacts okra dry biomass above ground”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–899 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The SIMDualKc model is capable of quantifying evaporation, transpiration and other water balance components of okra.

Outcome
quantifying evaporation, transpiration and other water balance componentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“The SIMDualKc Model is capable of quantifying evaporation, transpiration and other water balance components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The SIMDualKc model is an effective tool for assessing and predicting the impact of water deficit on okra development and yield.

Outcome
impact of water deficit on plant development and yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is an effective tool for assessing and predicting the impact of water deficit on plant development and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The SIMDualKc model can be used to identify the correct irrigation strategy for maximizing okra production.

Outcome
identify the correct irrigation strategy for maximizing crop productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“can be used to identify the correct irrigation strategy for maximizing crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1212 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.