Abstract
Waterlogging is a significant abiotic stressor that severely hampers sugarcane productionworldwide. To address this issue, experiments were conducted at the Sugarcane Research Station, Cuddalore, (TNAU), during 2022-2023 to evaluate the waterlogging tolerance of sugarcane clones.The experiment followed a factorial completely randomized design (FCRD) with three replications.Treatments included two water levels (control and waterlogging) and thirteen sugarcane clones orvarieties (Co 86032, C 2015 095, G 11035, C 2014 516, C 16338, C 30010, Co 15020, Co 62175, C2015 021, Si 2014 047, CoC 13339, C 2015 006, CoG 7). After 70 days of seedling, plants weresubjected to 20 days of waterlogging. Waterlogging stress significantly reduced total dry matterproduction, soluble protein, stomatal density, leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight, shootlength, root length and SPAD values in all sugarcane clones compared to the control. Conversely,the extent of aerenchyma and aerial roots increased. However, CoC 13339, C 16338, C 2014 516and Co 62175 demonstrated superior waterlogging tolerance among the 13 sugarcaneclones/varieties. These sugarcane clones/varieties have more adventitious roots at the base of theirstems, which most likely made it easier for the plants to survive waterlogging.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging significantly reduced total dry matter production, soluble protein and stomatal density in sugarcane clones.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e1“Waterlogging stress significantly reduced total dry matter production, soluble protein, stomatal density, leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight, shoot length, root length and SPAD values in all sugarcane clones compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging significantly reduced leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight and shoot length in sugarcane clones.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e1“Waterlogging stress significantly reduced total dry matter production, soluble protein, stomatal density, leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight, shoot length, root length and SPAD values in all sugarcane clones compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging significantly reduced root length and SPAD values in sugarcane clones.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e1“Waterlogging stress significantly reduced total dry matter production, soluble protein, stomatal density, leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight, shoot length, root length and SPAD values in all sugarcane clones compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging increased the extent of aerenchyma and aerial roots in sugarcane clones.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e1“Waterlogging stress significantly reduced total dry matter production, soluble protein, stomatal density, leaf area, above-ground fresh and dry weight, shoot length, root length and SPAD values in all sugarcane clones compared to the control”
e2“the extent of aerenchyma and aerial roots increased”
Claim · model-written summary
Clones CoC 13339, C 16338, C 2014 516 and Co 62175 show superior waterlogging tolerance.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e3“CoC 13339, C 16338, C 2014 516and Co 62175 demonstrated superior waterlogging tolerance”
Claim · model-written summary
More adventitious roots at the stem base likely help sugarcane clones survive waterlogging.
Verbatim
t0“Assessing sugarcane clones' resilience to waterlogging stress”
e4“These sugarcane clones/varieties have more adventitious roots”
e5“to survive waterlogging”
The same questions in other papers
flooding · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →flooding · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.