Paper · 2007 · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)

"Flooding Tolerance of Sugarcane in Relation to Growth, Physiology and Root Structure"

Tetsushi Hidaka; Abdul Karim

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Different abiotic stresses, such as typhoon, excess water from the torrential rains, flooding during summer in the low lying areas and drought hinder sugarcane productivity. This study was initiated to analyze flooding induced changes in growth, physiology and root structure of sugarcane. A Japanese sugarcane variety, NiF8, was grown in pots inside a glasshouse under natural light and flooded for one month. Flooding increased root, leaf, stalk and total dry weight. Three different kinds of roots were initiated from the flooded plants, viz. (i) from the aerial nodes (above the water surface), which were reddish-black in color; (ii) from the pre-existing roots primordia, which were developed under water and whitish in color; and (iii) from the newly developed roots, which had upward growth against the gravity and major portion above the water surface, were relatively thinner and pinkish in color. Roots growth showed a positive relationship with that of shoot growth. Photosynthetic rate (Pn) was decreased by flooding, but stomatal conductance (gs) and intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci) were increased; thus, indicated a non-stomatal limitation to Pn. Sugar concentration (brix) was found higher in the flood affected plants, especially in the juice of base and middle part of the stalk.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased root, leaf, and stalk dry weight.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
root, leaf, stalke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flooding increased root, leaf, stalk and total dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased total dry weight.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flooding increased root, leaf, stalk and total dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded plants initiated roots from aerial nodes above the water surface.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
aerial nodese0
Outcome
roots were initiatede0
Qualifier
reddish-black in colore0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“roots were initiated from the flooded plants, viz. (i) from the aerial nodes (above the water surface), which were reddish-black in color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded plants developed whitish roots underwater from pre-existing root primordia.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
pre-existing roots primordiae0
Outcome
developed under water and whitish in colore0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“from the pre-existing roots primordia, which were developed under water and whitish in color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded plants produced upward growing, thinner, pink roots with much of their length above the water.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
newly developed rootse0
Outcome
upward growth against the gravity and major portion above the water surfacee0
Qualifier
relatively thinner and pinkish in colore0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“from the newly developed roots, which had upward growth against the gravity and major portion above the water surface, were relatively thinner and pinkish in color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–906 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth was positively related to shoot growth.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
Roots growthe0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Roots growth showed a positive relationship with that of shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Photosynthetic rate (Pn) was decreased by flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
floodinge1
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“stomatal conductance (gs) and intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“by flooding, but stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased intercellular CO2 concentration.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
floodinge1
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“by flooding, but stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1055 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gas exchange pattern indicated a non-stomatal limitation to photosynthesis.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
non-stomatal limitation to Pne0
Qualifier
non-stomatal limitatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“indicated a non-stomatal limitation to Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded plants had higher sugar concentration, especially in juice from the stalk base and middle.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
juice of base and middle part of the stalke0
Treatment
flood affectede0
Outcome
Sugar concentration (brix)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugar concentration (brix) was found higher in the flood affected plants, especially in the juice of base and middle part of the stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1302 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

flooding · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.