Paper · 2018 · Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)

Toleransi Berbagai Varietas Tebu terhadap Penggenangan pada Fase Bibit Berdasarkan Karakter Morfologi dan Anatomi

Sholeh Avivi; Anang Syamsunihar; Sigit Soeparjono; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Identification of Indonesia sugarcane varieties tolerant to waterlogging has not been done extensively. Information on varieties tolerant to waterlogging is required for seedling establishment in waterlogged areas. The purpose of this research was to identify the sugarcane varieties responses to several duration levels of waterlogging at seedling stage. The planting materials used were collection of Sugar Factory Semboro including VMC 76-16, BL, PS 862, PS 864, and PS 881. This research was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two factors and three replications. The first factor was 5 varieties; the second factor was waterlogging treatment with four levels, i.e. without waterlogging, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of waterlogging in the bucket. The results showed different level of tolerance to water logging among the varities. PS 881 and VMC 76-16 varieties were the most tolerant to waterlogging supported by its ability to maintain plant height, root volume, root and shoot dry weight after been waterlogged for 6 weeks. These varieties were also able to establish aerenchyme tissue and increased the stomatal density. PS 862 was the least tolerant variety to waterlogging. Keywords: aerenchyme, morphology, stomatal density, waterlogging, water stress

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane varieties differed in waterlogging tolerance.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
tolerance to water logginge0

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed different level of tolerance to water logging among the varities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tebu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS 881 was among the most waterlogging tolerant varieties after six weeks, maintaining height, root volume and dry weights.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
PS 881e0
Treatment
waterlogged for 6 weekse0
Outcome
plant height, root volume, root and shoot dry weighte0
Direction
maintaine0
Comparator
without waterlogginge1

Verbatim

e0

“PS 881 and VMC 76-16 varieties were the most tolerant to waterlogging supported by its ability to maintain plant height, root volume, root and shoot dry weight after been waterlogged for 6 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“without waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VMC 76-16 was among the most waterlogging tolerant varieties after six weeks, maintaining height, root volume and dry weights.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
VMC 76-16e0
Treatment
waterlogged for 6 weekse0
Outcome
plant height, root volume, root and shoot dry weighte0
Direction
maintaine0
Comparator
without waterlogginge1

Verbatim

e0

“PS 881 and VMC 76-16 varieties were the most tolerant to waterlogging supported by its ability to maintain plant height, root volume, root and shoot dry weight after been waterlogged for 6 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“without waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS 881 developed aerenchyme and increased stomatal density.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
PS 881e1
Outcome
aerenchyme tissue and increased the stomatal densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“These varieties were also able to establish aerenchyme tissue and increased the stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“PS 881 and VMC 76-16 varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–877 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VMC 76-16 developed aerenchyme and increased stomatal density.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
VMC 76-16e1
Outcome
aerenchyme tissue and increased the stomatal densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“These varieties were also able to establish aerenchyme tissue and increased the stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“PS 881 and VMC 76-16 varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–877 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS 862 was the least tolerant sugarcane variety to waterlogging.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
PS 862e0
Outcome
least tolerant variety to waterlogginge0

Verbatim

e0

“PS 862 was the least tolerant variety to waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1194 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane varieties responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.