Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

The Impact of Fulvic Acids on Cotton Growth, Yield and Phosphorus Fertilizer Use Efficiency Under Different Phosphorus Fertilization Rates in Xinjiang, China

Kai Zhang; Xiaopeng Gao; Chao Ma; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chemical phosphorus (P) fertilizer is often overused in arid regions with alkaline soils due to soil fixation. Fulvic acid (FA) can increase soil P availability, enhancing crop yield and P use efficiency, but its interaction with P fertilization rates and potential to reduce P fertilizer application remains unclear. A 2-year (2019–2020) field experiment was conducted in Xinjiang, China, to study the impact of FA addition (45 kg ha−1) on cotton yield and P use efficiency under different P fertilization rates (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg P2O5 ha−1). Our results showed that P fertilization significantly enhanced cotton biomass, P uptake and seed cotton yields by 17–37%, but the partial nutrient balance (PNB), agronomic efficiency (AE) and partial factor productivity (PFP) decreased with increasing P fertilization rates. FA addition did not change cotton biomass and P uptake, but significantly enhanced seed cotton yield, AE and PFP by increasing bolls per plant. No significant interactions between FA addition and P fertilization rates were observed for cotton biomass, P uptake, seed cotton yield and P use efficiencies. These findings suggest that FA can improve cotton productivity, AE and PPF of P fertilizers, helping to keep the P balance in the cotton field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization significantly enhanced cotton biomass, P uptake and seed cotton yield by 17–37%.

Treatment
P fertilizatione2
Outcome
cotton biomass, P uptake and seed cotton yieldse2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
17–37%e2
Setting
Xinjiang, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A 2-year (2019–2020) field experiment was conducted in Xinjiang, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“P fertilization significantly enhanced cotton biomass, P uptake and seed cotton yields by 17–37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P fertilization rates decreased partial nutrient balance, agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity.

Treatment
increasing P fertilization ratese3
Outcome
partial nutrient balance (PNB), agronomic efficiency (AE) and partial factor productivity (PFP)e3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“P fertilization significantly enhanced cotton biomass, P uptake and seed cotton yields by 17–37%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–668 · show in text ↑
e3

“partial nutrient balance (PNB), agronomic efficiency (AE) and partial factor productivity (PFP) decreased with increasing P fertilization rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FA addition did not change cotton biomass or P uptake.

Treatment
FA additione4
Outcome
cotton biomass and P uptakee4
Direction
did not changee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“FA addition did not change cotton biomass and P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FA addition significantly enhanced seed cotton yield, agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity by increasing bolls per plant.

Treatment
FA additione5
Outcome
seed cotton yield, AE and PFPe5
Direction
significantly enhancede5
Qualifier
by increasing bolls per plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“FA addition did not change cotton biomass and P uptake, but significantly enhanced seed cotton yield, AE and PFP by increasing bolls per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–965 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant interaction between FA addition and P fertilization rates was observed for cotton biomass, P uptake, seed yield or P use efficiency.

Treatment
FA addition and P fertilization ratese6
Outcome
cotton biomass, P uptake, seed cotton yield and P use efficienciese6
Direction
No significant interactionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“No significant interactions between FA addition and P fertilization rates were observed for cotton biomass, P uptake, seed cotton yield and P use efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid can help keep the P balance in the cotton field while improving productivity and P fertilizer efficiency.

Outcome
keep the P balance in the cotton fielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“FA can improve cotton productivity, AE and PPF of P fertilizers, helping to keep the P balance in the cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1269 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

other · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.