Paper · 2009 · Plant and Soil

Effects of salinity and nitrogen on cotton growth in arid environment

Weiping Chen; Zhenan Hou; Laosheng Wu; et al.

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
226
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The influences of different N fertilization rates and soil salinity levels on the growth and nitrogen uptake of cotton was evaluated with a pot experiment under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that cotton growth measured as plant height was significantly affected by the soil salinity and N-salinity interaction, but not by N alone. Cotton was more sensitive to salinity during the emergence and early growth stages than the later developmental stages. At low to moderate soil salinity, the growth inhibition could be alleviated by fertilizer application. Soil salinity was a dominated factor affecting cotton’s above-ground dry mass and root development. Dry mass of seed was reduced by 22%, 52%, and 84% respectively, when the soil salinity level increased from control level of 2.4 dS m −1 to 7.7 dS m −1 , 12.5 dS m −1 and to 17.1 dS m −1 , respectively. N uptake increased with N fertilization at adequate rates at both low and medium soil salinities but was not influenced by over N fertilization. At higher salinities, N uptake was independent of N rates and mainly influenced by soil salinity. The uptake of K decreased with soil salinity. The concentration of Na, Cl and Ca in plant tissues increased with soil salinity with highest concentrations in the cotton leaf.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton height was significantly affected by soil salinity and its interaction with nitrogen fertilization.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton growth measured as plant height was significantly affected by the soil salinity and N-salinity interaction, but not by N alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization alone did not significantly affect cotton height.

Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton growth measured as plant height was significantly affected by the soil salinity and N-salinity interaction, but not by N alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–338 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton was more sensitive to salinity at emergence and early growth than at later stages.

Organ / stage
emergence and early growth stagese0
Outcome
sensitive to salinitye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
later developmental stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton was more sensitive to salinity during the emergence and early growth stages than the later developmental stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer alleviated cotton growth inhibition at low to moderate salinity.

Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
low to moderate soil salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low to moderate soil salinity, the growth inhibition could be alleviated by fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salinity affected cotton above-ground dry mass.

Treatment
Soil salinitye0
Outcome
above-ground dry masse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil salinity was a dominated factor affecting cotton’s above-ground dry mass and root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–661 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salinity affected cotton root development.

Treatment
Soil salinitye0
Outcome
root developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil salinity was a dominated factor affecting cotton’s above-ground dry mass and root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seed dry mass fell 22% at 7.7 dS m −1 relative to 2.4 dS m −1.

Treatment
7.7 dS m −1e0
Outcome
Dry mass of seede0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control level of 2.4 dS m −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry mass of seed was reduced by 22%, 52%, and 84% respectively, when the soil salinity level increased from control level of 2.4 dS m −1 to 7.7 dS m −1 , 12.5 dS m −1 and to 17.1 dS m −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seed dry mass fell 52% at 12.5 dS m −1 relative to 2.4 dS m −1.

Treatment
12.5 dS m −1e0
Outcome
Dry mass of seede0
Direction
reducede0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
control level of 2.4 dS m −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry mass of seed was reduced by 22%, 52%, and 84% respectively, when the soil salinity level increased from control level of 2.4 dS m −1 to 7.7 dS m −1 , 12.5 dS m −1 and to 17.1 dS m −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seed dry mass fell 84% at 17.1 dS m −1 relative to 2.4 dS m −1.

Treatment
17.1 dS m −1e0
Outcome
Dry mass of seede0
Direction
reducede0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
control level of 2.4 dS m −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry mass of seed was reduced by 22%, 52%, and 84% respectively, when the soil salinity level increased from control level of 2.4 dS m −1 to 7.7 dS m −1 , 12.5 dS m −1 and to 17.1 dS m −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate nitrogen fertilization increased nitrogen uptake at low and medium salinity.

Treatment
N fertilization at adequate ratese0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
low and medium soil salinitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake increased with N fertilization at adequate rates at both low and medium soil salinities but was not influenced by over N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen fertilization did not influence cotton nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
over N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake increased with N fertilization at adequate rates at both low and medium soil salinities but was not influenced by over N fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher salinities cotton nitrogen uptake depended mainly on soil salinity and not nitrogen rate.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Qualifier
higher salinitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher salinities, N uptake was independent of N rates and mainly influenced by soil salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium uptake decreased as soil salinity increased.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
uptake of Ke0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of K decreased with soil salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton tissue sodium, chloride and calcium concentrations increased with salinity, highest in leaves.

Organ / stage
cotton leafe0
Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
concentration of Na, Cl and Ca in plant tissuese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Na, Cl and Ca in plant tissues increased with soil salinity with highest concentrations in the cotton leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1282 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.