Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Effects on Boll Production of Field‐Grown Cotton

D. J. Boquet; E. B. Moser; G. A. Breitenbeck

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) that affects plant growth, fruiting, and yield. This study was conducted to determine N effects on the development of harvestable bolls (HB) at fruiting sites among reproductive branches (sympodia). Field experiments were conducted from 1987 through 1990 on Commerce silt loam (fine‐silty, mixed, thermic, nonacid, aeric Fluvaquent) to evaluate responses to preplant N rates of 0, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, and 168 kg ha −1 , and to split applications of 56 + 56 kg N ha −1 . Increasing N decreased HB production at Sympodia 5 through 10, and increased HB at Sympodia 12 through 25. At Sympodia 5 through 10, production of HB at Fruiting Site 1 (first position on sympodial branch) decreased from 49% of fruiting sites at the 0 N rate, to 36% of fruiting sites, with N fertilization of 168 kg ha −1 . Harvestable boll production at Sympodia 11 through 16 increased from 58% at 0 N up to a maximum of 69% at 84 kg N ha −1 . At Sympodia 17 through 25, fruiting sites developing HB increased from 9% up to a mximum of 28% with application of 140 kg N ha −1 . Whole‐plant HB development at Fruiting Sites 1, 2, and 3 was optimized at 42, 23, and 8%, respectively, by N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1 . Averaged over all fruiting sites, maximum whole‐plant HB development of 24% was obtained with 84 kg N ha −1 . Results demonstrate that increased N increased the total number of HB per plant. Increase in yield potential in response to N was limited, however, by decrease in HB at lower sympodia as N was increased, and by the inability of plants to more effectively develop bolls at Fruiting Site 2 and 3, and those at upper sympodia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen decreased harvestable boll production at sympodia 5 through 10.

Organ / stage
Sympodia 5 through 10e0
Treatment
Increasing Ne0
Outcome
HB productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N decreased HB production at Sympodia 5 through 10, and increased HB at Sympodia 12 through 25.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen increased harvestable boll production at sympodia 12 through 25.

Organ / stage
Sympodia 12 through 25e0
Treatment
Increasing Ne0
Outcome
HBe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N decreased HB production at Sympodia 5 through 10, and increased HB at Sympodia 12 through 25.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At sympodia 5 through 10, fruiting site 1 boll production fell from 49% at zero nitrogen to 36% at 168 kg ha−1.

Treatment
N fertilization of 168 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
production of HB at Fruiting Site 1e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
49%e0
Comparator
0 N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Sympodia 5 through 10, production of HB at Fruiting Site 1 (first position on sympodial branch) decreased from 49% of fruiting sites at the 0 N rate, to 36% of fruiting sites, with N fertilization of 168 kg ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At sympodia 11 through 16, harvestable boll production rose from 58% at zero nitrogen to 69% at 84 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
84 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
Harvestable boll productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
69%e0
Qualifier
58%e0
Comparator
0 Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvestable boll production at Sympodia 11 through 16 increased from 58% at 0 N up to a maximum of 69% at 84 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At sympodia 17 through 25, fruiting sites with harvestable bolls rose from 9% to 28% with 140 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
140 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
fruiting sites developing HBe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Sympodia 17 through 25, fruiting sites developing HB increased from 9% up to a mximum of 28% with application of 140 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant harvestable boll development at fruiting site 1 was optimized at 42% by 56 to 84 kg N ha−1.

Outcome
Whole‐plant HB developmente0
Direction
optimizede0
Value
42e0
Qualifier
N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole‐plant HB development at Fruiting Sites 1, 2, and 3 was optimized at 42, 23, and 8%, respectively, by N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant harvestable boll development at fruiting site 2 was optimized at 23% by 56 to 84 kg N ha−1.

Outcome
Whole‐plant HB developmente0
Direction
optimizede0
Value
23e0
Qualifier
N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole‐plant HB development at Fruiting Sites 1, 2, and 3 was optimized at 42, 23, and 8%, respectively, by N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant harvestable boll development at fruiting site 3 was optimized at 8% by 56 to 84 kg N ha−1.

Outcome
Whole‐plant HB developmente0
Direction
optimizede0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole‐plant HB development at Fruiting Sites 1, 2, and 3 was optimized at 42, 23, and 8%, respectively, by N rates between 56 and 84 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum whole-plant harvestable boll development was 24% at 84 kg N ha−1.

Outcome
whole‐plant HB developmente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
84 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Averaged over all fruiting sites, maximum whole‐plant HB development of 24% was obtained with 84 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased the total number of harvestable bolls per plant.

Treatment
increased Ne0
Outcome
total number of HB per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrate that increased N increased the total number of HB per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield potential gains from nitrogen were limited by fewer harvestable bolls at lower sympodia and poor boll development at sites 2 and 3 and upper sympodia.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Qualifier
decrease in HB at lower sympodiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in yield potential in response to N was limited, however, by decrease in HB at lower sympodia as N was increased, and by the inability of plants to more effectively develop bolls at Fruiting Site 2 and 3, and those at upper sympodia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 497 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.