Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Enhancing nitrogen fertilizer productivity in cotton fields in southern Xinjiang by improving the soil microenvironment through water and nitrogen management

Fengnian Zhao; Weixiong Huang; Xin Zhao; et al.

17
claims
39
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Optimizing water and nitrogen management is an effective measure to reduce nitrogen fertilizer losses and environmental pollution risks. To quantify the effects of different water and nitrogen management practices on the microenvironment of drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang and partial factor productivity of N (PFP N ), this study aims to clarify the relationship between the soil microenvironment and PFP N in cotton. This study established two irrigation levels of 45 mm (W1) and 54 mm (W2), and three nitrogen application rates of 150 kg·hm −2 (F1), 225 kg·hm −2 (F2), and 300 kg·hm −2 (F3), to analyze changes in soil physicochemical properties, soil enzyme activities, soil N 2 O emissions, soil microbial communities, cotton yield, and nitrogen fertilizer productivity in cotton fields. The results showed that at the same irrigation level, increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %. It significantly reduced soil PH by 1.18–2.24 %, water-filled pore space (WFPS) by 7.61–17.61 %, and PFP N by 28.67–47.59 %. Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05). It significantly reduced total nitrogen (TN) by 14.93 %, NN by 8.60 %, and AN by 10.96 %. Significant differences were observed in the activities of soil urease (URE), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), catalase (CAT), and sucrase (SUC) under different treatments in cotton fields. Increasing both the irrigation quota and nitrogen application significantly reduced bacterial alpha diversity. Under high water and high nitrogen treatments, several nitrogen cycle-related bacterial genera, such as Nitrospira and Sphingomonas , were enriched. The structural equation model (SEM) indicated that optimizing water and nitrogen management can improve PFP N in cotton by enhancing the soil microenvironment. The comprehensive TOPSIS evaluation showed that the combination of a 54 mm irrigation quota and a nitrogen application rate of 150 kg·hm −2 performed best in reducing N 2 O emissions, enhancing soil microbial diversity, cotton yield, and PFP N . This study further improves the theoretical system of non-mulched drip irrigation cotton production in southern Xinjiang, facilitates the promotion of clean agricultural production practices, and provides a research basis for improving the soil microenvironment in typical arid farmlands. • Cotton Partial Factor Productivity of N is improved by regulated soil microenvironment. • Reducing N 2 O emissions favours Cotton partial factor productivity of N. • Cotton Partial Factor Productivity of N and soil bacterial community diversity were improved with W2F1 regime. • The study strategies for cleaner production of non-mulched drip irrigation cotton are provided.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen content by 10.76–21.23 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
nitrate nitrogen (NN) contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.76–21.23 %e1
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly increased ammonium nitrogen content by 25.99–54.38 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
ammonium nitrogen (AN) contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25.99–54.38 %e1
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly increased N2O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
47.19–101.53 %e1
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly reduced soil pH by 1.18–2.24 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
soil PHe2
Direction
reducede2
Value
1.18–2.24 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
e2

“It significantly reduced soil PH by 1.18–2.24 %, water-filled pore space (WFPS) by 7.61–17.61 %, and PFP N by 28.67–47.59 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly reduced water-filled pore space by 7.61–17.61 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
water-filled pore space (WFPS)e2
Direction
reducede2
Value
7.61–17.61 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
e2

“It significantly reduced soil PH by 1.18–2.24 %, water-filled pore space (WFPS) by 7.61–17.61 %, and PFP N by 28.67–47.59 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen application significantly reduced PFP N by 28.67–47.59 %.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen applicatione1
Outcome
PFP Ne2
Direction
reducede2
Value
28.67–47.59 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing nitrogen application significantly increased nitrate nitrogen (NN) content by 10.76–21.23 %, ammonium nitrogen (AN) content by 25.99–54.38 %, and N 2 O emissions by 47.19–101.53 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1068 · show in text ↑
e2

“It significantly reduced soil PH by 1.18–2.24 %, water-filled pore space (WFPS) by 7.61–17.61 %, and PFP N by 28.67–47.59 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased water-filled pore space by 12.80 % at the same nitrogen level.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
WFPSe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
12.80 %e3
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased N2O emissions by 17.43 % at the same nitrogen level.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
N 2 O emissionse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
17.43 %e3
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased soil pH by 1.27 % at the same nitrogen level.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
soil pHe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.27 %e3
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly reduced total nitrogen by 14.93 %.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
total nitrogen (TN)e4
Direction
reducede4
Value
14.93 %e4
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
e4

“It significantly reduced total nitrogen (TN) by 14.93 %, NN by 8.60 %, and AN by 10.96 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly reduced NN by 8.60 %.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
NNe4
Direction
reducede4
Value
8.60 %e4
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
e4

“It significantly reduced total nitrogen (TN) by 14.93 %, NN by 8.60 %, and AN by 10.96 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the irrigation quota significantly reduced AN by 10.96 %.

Treatment
increasing the irrigation quotae3
Outcome
ANe4
Direction
reducede4
Value
10.96 %e4
Comparator
same nitrogen application levele3
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same nitrogen application level, increasing the irrigation quota significantly increased WFPS by 12.80 %, N 2 O emissions by 17.43 %, and soil pH by 1.27 % (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1371 · show in text ↑
e4

“It significantly reduced total nitrogen (TN) by 14.93 %, NN by 8.60 %, and AN by 10.96 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil urease, alkaline phosphatase, catalase and sucrase activities differed significantly among treatments in cotton fields.

Treatment
different treatmentse5
Outcome
activities of soil urease (URE), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), catalase (CAT), and sucrase (SUC)e5
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e5

“Significant differences were observed in the activities of soil urease (URE), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), catalase (CAT), and sucrase (SUC) under different treatments in cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing both the irrigation quota and nitrogen application significantly reduced bacterial alpha diversity.

Treatment
Increasing both the irrigation quota and nitrogen applicatione6
Outcome
bacterial alpha diversitye6
Direction
reducede6
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increasing both the irrigation quota and nitrogen application significantly reduced bacterial alpha diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high water and high nitrogen treatments, nitrogen cycle-related bacterial genera such as Nitrospira and Sphingomonas were enriched.

Treatment
high water and high nitrogen treatmentse7
Outcome
nitrogen cycle-related bacterial generae7
Direction
enrichede7
Qualifier
Nitrospira and Sphingomonase7
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e7

“Under high water and high nitrogen treatments, several nitrogen cycle-related bacterial genera, such as Nitrospira and Sphingomonas , were enriched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1906 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimizing water and nitrogen management is associated with improved PFP N in cotton by enhancing the soil microenvironment.

Treatment
optimizing water and nitrogen managemente5
Outcome
PFP Ne5
Direction
improvee5
Qualifier
by enhancing the soil microenvironmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The structural equation model (SEM) indicated that optimizing water and nitrogen management can improve PFP N in cotton by enhancing the soil microenvironment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–2066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 54 mm irrigation quota with 150 kg·hm −2 nitrogen performed best in reducing N2O emissions, enhancing soil microbial diversity, cotton yield, and PFP N.

Treatment
combination of a 54 mm irrigation quota and a nitrogen application rate of 150 kg·hm −2e5
Outcome
reducing N 2 O emissionse5
Direction
performed beste5
Qualifier
enhancing soil microbial diversity, cotton yield, and PFP Ne5
Setting
southern Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip-irrigated cotton fields without film in southern Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–303 · show in text ↑
e5

“The comprehensive TOPSIS evaluation showed that the combination of a 54 mm irrigation quota and a nitrogen application rate of 150 kg·hm −2 performed best in reducing N 2 O emissions, enhancing soil microbial diversity, cotton yield, and PFP N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2068–2311 · show in text ↑

irrigation · environment: emissions · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.