Paper · 2024 · African Journal of Biomedical Research

“Isolation And Characterisation of Nickel-Tolerant Indigenous Bacteria And Its Effect On Chickpea Growth Parameters Under Nickel Stress”

K. Jyothsna Jyothsna

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Modernisation of mankind without causing a disturbance to the ecosystem and the environment has become a herculean task in the present scenario. One major cause of ecological disturbance is heavy metal pollution, due to anthropogenic activities which is affecting the ecosystem. The present study focuses on heavy metal pollution by Nickel. Nickel is an essential micronutrient for plants, responsible for seed germination, seedling growth, activity of enzyme urease and for the activation of the enzyme, glyoxylase. However, increased concentration is toxic to plants. Few places nearby Visakhapatnam were identified where Nickel has polluted the soil. 9 different bacteria were isolated from these soils, among which S1 was found to be Ni-tolerant indigenous bacteria. 99.18% of this bacterial sequence was identified to be in closest proximity with Bacillus cereus. Two cultivars of chickpea (ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptible) were found to improve their growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of this bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate S1 was found to be Ni-tolerant among nine bacteria isolated from polluted soils.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Interactor
S1e2other
Outcome
Ni-tolerante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“S1 was found to be Ni-tolerant indigenous bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–769 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two cultivars of chickpea (ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptible) were found to improve their growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of this bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1037 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequence of isolate S1 is 99.18% similar to Bacillus cereus.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse3other
Outcome
bacterial sequencee3
Value
99.18%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“99.18% of this bacterial sequence was identified to be in closest proximity with Bacillus cereus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–867 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two cultivars of chickpea (ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptible) were found to improve their growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of this bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1037 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel has polluted the soil in a few places near Visakhapatnam.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Outcome
Nickel has polluted the soile1
Setting
places nearby Visakhapatname1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Few places nearby Visakhapatnam were identified where Nickel has polluted the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–652 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two cultivars of chickpea (ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptible) were found to improve their growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of this bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1037 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two chickpea cultivars were found to improve growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of the isolate.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Material
ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptiblee4
Treatment
Ni stress in the presence of this bacteriae4
Interactor
S1e2symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse4
Direction
improvee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“S1 was found to be Ni-tolerant indigenous bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–769 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two cultivars of chickpea (ICCV10102-resistant and ICCV93952-susceptible) were found to improve their growth parameters under Ni stress in the presence of this bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1037 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.