Paper · 2010 · AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES

Effect of Varying Concentration of Nickel and Cobalt on the Plant Growth and Yield of Chickpea

Mujeebur Rahman Khan; Mohd. Mahmud Khan

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
100
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of chickpea, Cicer arietinum cv. T-3 to nickel and cobalt at 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 and 400 ppm concentrations. The bacterized seeds of chickpea were sown in 15 cm clay pots containing 1.5 kg steam sterilized soil. Before the sowing 550 ml metal solution of different concentrations was added per pot. Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea. Seed germination, plant growth and biomass production were adversely affected. Root nodulation was suppressed and number of functional nodules appreciably decreased. Leaf chlorophyll contents were greatly reduced. These adverse impacts reflected in reduced yield of the plants. Nickel was apparently more harmful than cobalt to chickpea. The study suggests that cultivation of crops like chickpea in metal polluted soils should be avoided or appropriate control measures be adopted to maintain the heavy metal content of the soil below the damage threshold levels, which was found to be 10 ppm Ni and 50 ppm Co for chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nickel and cobalt concentrations injured chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte0
Outcome
chickpeae0
Direction
injuriouse0
Qualifier
higher concentrations (100-400 ppm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High metal concentrations reduced chickpea seed germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Qualifier
higher concentrations (100-400 ppm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea. Seed germination, plant growth and biomass production were adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High metal concentrations reduced chickpea plant growth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Qualifier
higher concentrations (100-400 ppm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea. Seed germination, plant growth and biomass production were adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High metal concentrations reduced chickpea biomass production.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Qualifier
higher concentrations (100-400 ppm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea. Seed germination, plant growth and biomass production were adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root nodulation was suppressed.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte1
Outcome
Root nodulatione0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root nodulation was suppressed and number of functional nodules appreciably decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Functional nodule count declined.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte1
Outcome
number of functional nodulese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root nodulation was suppressed and number of functional nodules appreciably decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content declined.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte1
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll contents were greatly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield declined.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nickel and cobalte1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These adverse impacts reflected in reduced yield of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nickel and cobalt at the higher concentrations (100-400 ppm) were found injurious to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel was apparently more harmful than cobalt to chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Nickele0
Outcome
harmfule0
Direction
more harmfule0
Comparator
cobalte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel was apparently more harmful than cobalt to chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–789 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated damage threshold was 10 ppm Ni.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
damage threshold levelse0
Value
10 ppm Nie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damage threshold levels, which was found to be 10 ppm Ni and 50 ppm Co for chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1076 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated damage threshold was 50 ppm Co.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
damage threshold levelse0
Value
50 ppm Coe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damage threshold levels, which was found to be 10 ppm Ni and 50 ppm Co for chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1076 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise avoiding chickpea cultivation on metal polluted soils or controlling soil metal below damage thresholds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
cultivation of crops like chickpea in metal polluted soils should be avoided or appropriate control measures be adoptede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivation of crops like chickpea in metal polluted soils should be avoided or appropriate control measures be adopted to maintain the heavy metal content of the soil below the damage threshold levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1016 · show in text ↑

cobalt atom · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nickel atom · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cobalt atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cobalt atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nickel atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cobalt atom · organism · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nickel atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.