Paper · 2025 · The Crop Journal

Optimized boll-loading capacity of cotton root system increases seedcotton yield under wheat-cotton straw return with appropriate nitrogen fertilization

Zhitao Liu; Wen Jin; Qin Wang; et al.

16
claims
39
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Long-term straw return with appropriate nitrogen (N) fertilization increases seedcotton yield and fiber quality, and the root system plays an important role in cotton production. However, under straw return and N fertilization, the relationship between the cotton boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield remains unclear. In this study, a ten years of long-term field experiment was conducted in a wheat–cotton rotation system. The effects of straw treatments (straw return and straw removal) and N rates (N0, N75, N150 and N300 representing 0, 75, 150 and 300 kg N ha −1 , respectively) on cotton root activity, boll-loading capacity of the root system and their relationship to seedcotton yield from 2019 to 2022 were quantified. The results showed that straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass. Furthermore, the root-bleeding sap rate reached the maximum at 30 days post anthesis (DPA) during the peak boll setting stage. However, the contents of nitrate-N, free amino acids and soluble sugar in root-bleeding sap decreased from 10 DPA. Notably, in 2021 and at 30 DPA, the highest contents of nitrate-N (4.8 μg mL −1 ) and free amino acids (8.3μg mL −1 ), as well as soluble sugar (3.4 μg mL −1 ) were observed at N150 under straw return. The increase in seedcotton yield is positively correlated to the soluble sugar content. Straw return significantly increased the boll-loading capacity of the root system, which first increased but then decreased with the increase in N fertilization. Under straw return with N150, the maximum seecotton yield (3455–4544 kg ha −1 ) was recorded, and the largest boll loading (49–54 boll 100 g −1 ) and boll capacity (242–292 g 100 g −1 ) of root system at the boll opening stage were observed. Therefore, straw return with appropriate N fertilization improved root activity and the boll-loading capacity of the root system, thereby increasing seedcotton yield. This study provides new insights into improving seedcotton yield from the perspective of coordinating cotton growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 increased cotton root biomass relative to straw removal.

Treatment
straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150e1
Outcome
root biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1026 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 increased the rate and components of root-bleeding sap in cotton.

Treatment
straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150e1
Outcome
rate and components of root-bleeding sape1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1026 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 increased the boll-loading capacity of the cotton root system.

Treatment
straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150e1
Outcome
boll-loading capacity of the root systeme1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1026 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 increased seedcotton yield relative to straw removal.

Treatment
straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150e1
Outcome
seedcotton yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1026 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with N150 decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass in cotton.

Treatment
straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150e1
Outcome
ratio of root to shoot biomasse1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw return with an appropriate N fertilization of N150 increased root biomass, the rate and components of root-bleeding sap, as well as boll-loading capacity of the root system and seedcotton yield, but decreased the ratio of root to shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1026 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root-bleeding sap rate of cotton reached its maximum at 30 days post anthesis during the peak boll setting stage.

Organ / stage
peak boll setting stagee3
Outcome
root-bleeding sap ratee3
Direction
maximume3
Qualifier
30 days post anthesis (DPA)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“the root-bleeding sap rate reached the maximum at 30 days post anthesis (DPA) during the peak boll setting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-N content in root-bleeding sap was highest at N150 under straw return in 2021 and at 30 DPA, at 4.8 μg mL −1.

Treatment
N150 under straw returne5
Outcome
contents of nitrate-Ne5
Direction
higheste5
Value
4.8 μg mL −1e5
Qualifier
2021 and at 30 DPAe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“in 2021 and at 30 DPA, the highest contents of nitrate-N (4.8 μg mL −1 ) and free amino acids (8.3μg mL −1 ), as well as soluble sugar (3.4 μg mL −1 ) were observed at N150 under straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free amino acid content in root-bleeding sap was highest at N150 under straw return in 2021 and at 30 DPA, at 8.3 μg mL −1.

Treatment
N150 under straw returne5
Outcome
free amino acidse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
8.3μg mL −1e5
Qualifier
2021 and at 30 DPAe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“in 2021 and at 30 DPA, the highest contents of nitrate-N (4.8 μg mL −1 ) and free amino acids (8.3μg mL −1 ), as well as soluble sugar (3.4 μg mL −1 ) were observed at N150 under straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content in root-bleeding sap was highest at N150 under straw return in 2021 and at 30 DPA, at 3.4 μg mL −1.

Treatment
N150 under straw returne5
Outcome
soluble sugare5
Direction
higheste5
Value
3.4 μg mL −1e5
Qualifier
2021 and at 30 DPAe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“in 2021 and at 30 DPA, the highest contents of nitrate-N (4.8 μg mL −1 ) and free amino acids (8.3μg mL −1 ), as well as soluble sugar (3.4 μg mL −1 ) were observed at N150 under straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1470 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedcotton yield was positively correlated with the soluble sugar content of cotton root-bleeding sap.

Compound
soluble sugar contente6
Outcome
seedcotton yielde6
Direction
positively correlatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“The increase in seedcotton yield is positively correlated to the soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1558 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll-loading capacity of the root system first increased and then decreased as N fertilization increased under straw return.

Treatment
increase in N fertilizatione7
Outcome
boll-loading capacity of the root systeme7
Direction
first increased but then decreasede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“Straw return significantly increased the boll-loading capacity of the root system, which first increased but then decreased with the increase in N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return significantly increased the boll-loading capacity of the cotton root system relative to straw removal.

Treatment
Straw returne7
Outcome
boll-loading capacity of the root systeme7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“Straw return significantly increased the boll-loading capacity of the root system, which first increased but then decreased with the increase in N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1720 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum seedcotton yield under straw return with N150 was 3455–4544 kg ha −1.

Treatment
straw return with N150e0
Outcome
seecotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3455–4544 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under straw return with N150, the maximum seecotton yield (3455–4544 kg ha −1 ) was recorded, and the largest boll loading (49–54 boll 100 g −1 ) and boll capacity (242–292 g 100 g −1 ) of root system at the boll opening stage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest boll loading of the root system at the boll opening stage was 49–54 boll 100 g −1 under straw return with N150.

Organ / stage
root systeme0
Treatment
straw return with N150e0
Outcome
boll loadinge0
Direction
largeste0
Value
49–54 boll 100 g −1e0
Qualifier
at the boll opening stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under straw return with N150, the maximum seecotton yield (3455–4544 kg ha −1 ) was recorded, and the largest boll loading (49–54 boll 100 g −1 ) and boll capacity (242–292 g 100 g −1 ) of root system at the boll opening stage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest boll capacity of the root system at the boll opening stage was 242–292 g 100 g −1 under straw return with N150.

Organ / stage
root systeme0
Treatment
straw return with N150e0
Outcome
boll capacitye0
Direction
largeste0
Value
242–292 g 100 g −1e0
Qualifier
at the boll opening stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under straw return with N150, the maximum seecotton yield (3455–4544 kg ha −1 ) was recorded, and the largest boll loading (49–54 boll 100 g −1 ) and boll capacity (242–292 g 100 g −1 ) of root system at the boll opening stage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return with appropriate N fertilization improved cotton root activity relative to straw removal.

Treatment
straw return with appropriate N fertilizatione0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
straw removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“straw return with appropriate N fertilization improved root activity and the boll-loading capacity of the root system, thereby increasing seedcotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2129 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw treatments (straw return and straw removal)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–513 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

organic · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.