Paper · 1994 · jpa

Nitrogen and Mepiquat Chloride Effects on the Production of Nonrank, Irrigated, Short‐Season Cotton

R. K. Boman; R. L. Westerman

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
46
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen fertility is an important component of irrigated, short‐season cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production and is necessary to achieve optimum yield. Excessive N, however, almost invariably results in decreased yield and quality of cotton lint and seed. Use of mepiquat chloride (MC) ( N,N ‐dimethylpiperidinium chloride) for remediation of the detrimental effects of excessive N in cotton has been suggested. A field experiment was conducted for 3 yr to determine if MC applied at selected rates on traditionally nonrank, irrigated, short‐season cotton could influence cotton yield, related agronomic characteristics, and fiber properties at different N fertilizer rates. The experiment was conducted near Altus, OK, on a Tillman‐Hollister clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Pachic Paleustoll). Cotton lint and seed yield responded positively to the Oklahoma State University recommended rate of 50 lb/acre of fertilizer N in all 3 yr, but negatively at the higher rates in the second and third years. Application of MC did not affect lint yield, seed yield, or lint/seed ratio in any year. Higher N fertilizer rates generally produced taller plants (by as much as 3.2 in.) while MC significantly reduced plant height (by as much as 5.7 in.) during this 3 yr. Percentage first harvest was increased (up to 5.5%) by MC in 1 yr, but was reduced (by as much as 17.4%) by higher N rates. Lint percentages were generally reduced by N fertilizer in all years, but were not affected by MC in any year. Excessive N increased fiber grayness in 1 yr and fiber yellowness in another, but did not affect micronaire, length, uniformity, strength, elongation, or leaf index in any of the 3 yr. Applications of MC increased fiber strength in 1 of 3 yr (by 3.8%). They also affected elongation, fiber grayness, and leaf index in 1 yr apiece but not in the two others. Data from this study indicate that for measured parameters, the only consistent positive effects of MC use under any N fertilization regime was reduced plant height. No significant N × MC rate interactions were noted. Research Question Nitrogen fertility is an important component of irrigated short‐season cotton production and is necessary to achieve optimum yield. Excessive N, however, often results in maturity delays and subsequent decreased yield and quality of fiber and seed. Use of mepiquat chloride (MC) has been suggested to counteract the detrimental effects of excessive N in cotton. The objective of this study was to determine whether MC applied at selected rates on traditionally nonrank, irrigated, short‐season cotton could influence cotton yield, related agronomic characteristics, and fiber properties at different N fertilizer rates. Literature Summary Mepiquat chloride has been used in full‐season, picker‐type cotton production systems with varied success. Application of MC is reported to consistently decrease plant size. Some authors report significant yield increases under certain circumstances; others little or none. Few studies have been published pertaining to irrigated, short‐season cotton as produced on the Rolling Plains of Oklahoma and Texas and to the potential of MC to alleviate detrimental effects of excessive N in that region. Study Description A field experiment was conducted on a Tillman‐Hollister clay loam, near Altus, OK, for 3 yr. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with a factorial arrangement of treatments and four replications. Nitrogen rates of 0, 50, 100, and 200 lb of actual N/acre were applied broadcast preplant and disk incorporated. ‘Paymaster 404’ cotton was seeded each year at 21 lb/acre. Mepiquat chloride rates of 0, 0.022, and 0.044 lb a.i./acre (½ pint and 1 pint/acre of 0.35 lb/gallon material, respectively) were superimposed on N rates and foliar applied at early bloom. Irrigation and insecticides were applied as judged necessary. Applied Questions What are the effects of excessive N in nonrank, irrigated, short‐season cotton production? Cotton lint yield responded positively to 50 lb/acre of fertilizer N in all 3 yr. Excessive accumulation of N at the two higher rates, however, resulted in lint yield reductions by the second and third years of the experiment (Fig. ). Seed yield response followed the same pattern as did lint yield, though seed weight increased faster than lint weight. Plant height increased up to 3.2 in. by N fertilization in these experiments while maturity (as measured by percentage first harvest) declined by as much as 17.4%. Lint percentages declined, thus increasing harvest and ginning costs per bale. Higher N rates increased fiber grayness in 1 yr and fiber yellowness in another, but did not affect micronaire, length, uniformity, strength, elongation, or leaf index in any of the 3 yr. Use of N displayed positive and negative effects. At the modest rate of 50 lb/acre, application of N appears economically justified because of the increased lint and seed yield; whereas, the higher rates do not because of the suppressed yields in years 2 and 3. Excessive N resulted in various other unfavorable effects on the plant, higher costs of production, and the potential for environmental degradation. Oklahoma State University soil test recommendations for N fertilizer management were appropriate for maximizing lint yields over the 3 yr. Could any effects of excessive N be overcome in this production situation with the growth regulator mepiquat chloride? Mepiquat chloride did not influence lint and seed yield or their ratio in any of the 3 yr in this experiment. Applications of MC consistently reduced plant height in all years by as much as 5.7 in. However, since this cotton was not rank initially and since plant height correlated poorly with stripper lint percentage, the reductions in height were of doubtful direct economic value. Use of MC increased earliness by up to 5.5% in 1 yr, but was ineffective in another. Fiber strength was increased by up to 3.8% in 1 yr, but not in the 2 other yr. Fiber elongation was increased (a favorable effect) as was grayness (an unfavorable effect) in 1 yr, but in another year leaf index was increased (an unfavorable effect). Rates of MC did not significantly influence micronaire, length, uniformity, or yellowness. Results from this study conducted on nonrank, irrigated, short‐season cotton indicate that, with the exception of plant height, MC application to any N fertilizer management regime had minimal direct benefit on measured parameters. Effect of N fertilization on lint yield in southwest Oklahoma over a 3‐yr period, in actual units. image

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen increased cotton lint and seed yield in all three years.

Treatment
50 lb/acre of fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
lint and seed yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton lint and seed yield responded positively to the Oklahoma State University recommended rate of 50 lb/acre of fertilizer N in all 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates reduced cotton lint and seed yield in years two and three.

Treatment
higher ratese0
Outcome
lint and seed yielde0
Direction
negativelye0
Qualifier
second and third yearse0
Comparator
50 lb/acre of fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton lint and seed yield responded positively to the Oklahoma State University recommended rate of 50 lb/acre of fertilizer N in all 3 yr, but negatively at the higher rates in the second and third years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride did not significantly change cotton lint yield, seed yield or their ratio.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
lint yield, seed yield, or lint/seed ratioe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of MC did not affect lint yield, seed yield, or lint/seed ratio in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates increased cotton plant height by up to 3.2 inches.

Treatment
Higher N fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Value
3.2 in.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher N fertilizer rates generally produced taller plants (by as much as 3.2 in.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1179 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride reduced cotton height by as much as 5.7 inches.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5.7 in.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC significantly reduced plant height (by as much as 5.7 in.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased first harvest percentage by up to 5.5% in one year.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
Percentage first harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage first harvest was increased (up to 5.5%) by MC in 1 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates reduced first harvest percentage by up to 17.4%.

Treatment
higher N ratese0
Outcome
Percentage first harveste0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage first harvest was increased (up to 5.5%) by MC in 1 yr, but was reduced (by as much as 17.4%) by higher N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer generally reduced lint percentages.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
Lint percentagese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint percentages were generally reduced by N fertilizer in all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1458 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride did not affect lint percentages.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
Lint percentagese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint percentages were generally reduced by N fertilizer in all years, but were not affected by MC in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1499 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen increased fiber grayness in one year.

Treatment
Excessive Ne0
Outcome
fiber graynesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive N increased fiber grayness in 1 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1545 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess nitrogen increased fiber yellowness in another year.

Treatment
Excessive Ne0
Outcome
fiber yellownesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive N increased fiber grayness in 1 yr and fiber yellowness in another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1577 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased fiber strength by 3.8% in one year.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
fiber strengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of MC increased fiber strength in 1 of 3 yr (by 3.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1752 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased fiber elongation in one year.

Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
Fiber elongatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber elongation was increased (a favorable effect)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5998–6049 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of MC increased earliness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5834–5863 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased fiber grayness in one year.

Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
graynesse0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as was grayness (an unfavorable effect) in 1 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6050–6097 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of MC increased earliness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5834–5863 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased leaf index in one year.

Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
leaf indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf index was increased (an unfavorable effect)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6119–6167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of MC increased earliness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5834–5863 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride did not significantly affect micronaire, length, uniformity or yellowness.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
micronaire, length, uniformity, or yellownesse0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates of MC did not significantly influence micronaire, length, uniformity, or yellowness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6169–6258 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant nitrogen by mepiquat chloride rate interaction was detected.

Outcome
N × MC rate interactionse0
Direction
No significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant N × MC rate interactions were noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2024–2074 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged the recommended nitrogen rate economically justified and higher rates unjustified.

Treatment
50 lb/acree0
Outcome
application of N appears economically justifiede0
Qualifier
the higher rates do note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the modest rate of 50 lb/acre, application of N appears economically justified because of the increased lint and seed yield; whereas, the higher rates do not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4830–4990 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Mepiquat chloride had no effect on cotton fiber length or fiber elongation.

    Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride1 · 1985 · compared with control plots

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Mepiquat chloride did not change lint yield.

    Modification of Cotton Water Relations and Growth with Mepiquat Chloride1 · 1984 · compared with as a result of treatment

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

chloride · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 15 positive, 11 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Mepiquat chloride had no effect on cotton fiber length or fiber elongation.

    Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride1 · 1985 · compared with control plots

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Mepiquat chloride did not change lint yield.

    Modification of Cotton Water Relations and Growth with Mepiquat Chloride1 · 1984 · compared with as a result of treatment

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.